Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,386 Year: 3,643/9,624 Month: 514/974 Week: 127/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why Parallel Universes?
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 497 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 16 of 24 (136382)
08-23-2004 8:04 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Mike Holland
08-23-2004 8:28 AM


Re: Multiple univewrses?
Mike the unwiz writes:
To put it in more every-day terms, there has to be a universe where every penny that was ever tossed landed heads, and statistics just doesn't exist.
You are confused. Probability, or statistics, tells us the likelihood or the unlikelihood of an event. It is not the absolute truth.
There is nothing to prevent all pennies from landing heads.
The multi-verse is confusing to us mortals, just like almost everything in quantum physics. However, just because we mortals can't understand it yet doesn't mean it is not the case.

The Laminator
We are the bog. Resistance is voltage over current.
For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Mike Holland, posted 08-23-2004 8:28 AM Mike Holland has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Darwin Storm, posted 08-23-2004 10:47 PM coffee_addict has replied
 Message 18 by Primordial Egg, posted 08-24-2004 6:10 AM coffee_addict has not replied

Darwin Storm
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 24 (136411)
08-23-2004 10:47 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by coffee_addict
08-23-2004 8:04 PM


Re: Multiple univewrses?
The difference is that QM has observable data, with a comprehensive theory which describes the phenomenea very accuratley (though the why is still not there). Parrellel universes theories currently have not testable means of verification or disverification. Consequently, any notion of multiple universes is conjecture. There are several hypothesis that predict them, but currently, there is no evidence to support the existance of such universes.
This message has been edited by Darwin Storm, 08-23-2004 09:49 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by coffee_addict, posted 08-23-2004 8:04 PM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by coffee_addict, posted 08-25-2004 3:25 AM Darwin Storm has not replied

Primordial Egg
Inactive Member


Message 18 of 24 (136489)
08-24-2004 6:10 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by coffee_addict
08-23-2004 8:04 PM


Re: Multiple univewrses?
You are confused. Probability, or statistics, tells us the likelihood or the unlikelihood of an event. It is not the absolute truth.
There is nothing to prevent all pennies from landing heads.
I don't think Mike's confused here at all - he's just saying that statistical methods would not have been developed if there were not different outcomes (what would be the point?). It reminds me of a riddle I once heard:
Q. If you toss a coin 1000 times and it lands heads every time what are the chances of it coming up heads on the 1001th toss?
A. Pretty close to one. The coin is obviously loaded.
The multi-verse is confusing to us mortals, just like almost everything in quantum physics. However, just because we mortals can't understand it yet doesn't mean it is not the case.
I fully agree with you here - for me its the one satisfying answer to the question of 'why is there something rather than nothing?' Actually, there's everything.
PE

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by coffee_addict, posted 08-23-2004 8:04 PM coffee_addict has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Mike Holland, posted 08-24-2004 7:24 PM Primordial Egg has not replied

Mike Holland
Member (Idle past 503 days)
Posts: 179
From: Sydney, NSW,Auistralia
Joined: 08-30-2002


Message 19 of 24 (136632)
08-24-2004 7:24 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Primordial Egg
08-24-2004 6:10 AM


Re: Multiple universes?
O)K. I admit my gut feels have a dissonance with my logic. As correctly stated, somewhere in an infinite universe all penny-tosses have resulted in heads. And the next toss? Of course it will also land heads (in one of the resulting universes).
Also, in an infinite universe, there are an infinity of 'me's sitting at PCs typing this response.
I think I will stick with my gut feel. I don't believe it.
But thanks for the responses.
Mike.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Primordial Egg, posted 08-24-2004 6:10 AM Primordial Egg has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by coffee_addict, posted 08-25-2004 3:30 AM Mike Holland has replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 497 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 20 of 24 (136699)
08-25-2004 3:25 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by Darwin Storm
08-23-2004 10:47 PM


Re: Multiple univewrses?
I agree with you on the point of lack of data at this time.
DS writes:
Parrellel universes theories currently have not testable means of verification or disverification.
Haven't you seen Stargate SG-1? The episode where Daniel Jackson crossed into another "quantum reality" confirms our suspicion of the multiple universes conjecture.

The Laminator
We are the bog. Resistance is voltage over current.
For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Darwin Storm, posted 08-23-2004 10:47 PM Darwin Storm has not replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 497 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 21 of 24 (136701)
08-25-2004 3:30 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Mike Holland
08-24-2004 7:24 PM


Re: Multiple universes?
MH writes:
I think I will stick with my gut feel. I don't believe it.
Well, there are a lot of people that don't believe it. Only some of them don't believe it for the right reason, that there's simply no data to support it.
You might want to be be careful about that gut feeling of yours. People had the gut feelings about the causes of the bubonic plague for centuries before they found out the real causes. Gut feelings are good in the halls of L.A. high schools, but they're certainly not sufficient in other matters, like getting your next date.

The Laminator
We are the bog. Resistance is voltage over current.
For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Mike Holland, posted 08-24-2004 7:24 PM Mike Holland has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by Mike Holland, posted 08-25-2004 4:06 AM coffee_addict has not replied

Mike Holland
Member (Idle past 503 days)
Posts: 179
From: Sydney, NSW,Auistralia
Joined: 08-30-2002


Message 22 of 24 (136704)
08-25-2004 4:06 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by coffee_addict
08-25-2004 3:30 AM


Re: Multiple universes?
Thanks for the tip, Darth, but I am an old codger of 66, happily married for 40 years, so I won't be looking for any dates in the near future.
Hope you enjoy your next date in the majority of universes.
Mike.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by coffee_addict, posted 08-25-2004 3:30 AM coffee_addict has not replied

happy_atheist
Member (Idle past 4934 days)
Posts: 326
Joined: 08-21-2004


Message 23 of 24 (136780)
08-25-2004 12:11 PM


Well i'll agree that there isn't any data (that I know of anyway) supporting parallel universes. It's simply a stab in the dark at explaining strange quantum mechanical phenomena. Is it definately untestable though? I don't know...

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 24 of 24 (136785)
08-25-2004 12:30 PM


Thread copied to the Why Parallel Universes? thread in the Big Bang and Cosmology forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024