Age Correlations and an Old Earth

RAZD, I think HD made it clear he doesn't have an arguement for this. That is much more honest than many people here. I think he needs quite a bit of time.

And this is and example of the kind of deliberately misleading (read LIE) that your sources feed you and you swallow hook line and sinker.In addition, that issue has been dealt with here a number of times. If you've somehow missed it then it begins to smack of willful ignorance.Meanwhile you have NOT touched on the topic of this thread. The correlations. And neither have any of those false sources that your folks have on the web.As for all the rest of you assertions. Back them up.

Since we agree that dating is fundamental (pun intended ) it seems to me to be peripheral to discuss all sorts of other things about evolution and so on if we haven't discussed the dating issues.This thread is an attempt to focus on a very important point: the correlation between methods.This doesn't appear to have ever been discussed much less answered in any creationist source I've seen. It is also avoided by almost all our YEC visitors.I'm afraid that I can't suggest much better than to read it over. There is rather a lot now.

I don't know.I've wanted to save whole threads so my machine but there isn't anyway to do it.This thread is going to have to be closed due to the 300 post limit soon. We should, if you're brave enough to discuss this, start another one.I think once you've read the first 50 posts you will probably have the whole thing. Since we had more or less no YEC input there wasn't much but some rehashing, IIRC.