Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,916 Year: 4,173/9,624 Month: 1,044/974 Week: 3/368 Day: 3/11 Hour: 0/2


EvC Forum ⇒ Retired Forums ⇒ Short Subjects (No new topics or messages) ⇒

Great Debate challenge: Exodus Revealed

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Great Debate challenge: Exodus Revealed
Buzsaw
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 3 of 28 (130448)
08-04-2004 7:29 PM

Hi Charles. I'd rather see the 42 good pages of my original thread reopened and go from there with strict admin oversight so as to keep on topic.
​
This would prevent so much repititious posting and would keep the thread forward for reference.
​
This message has been edited by buzsaw, 08-04-2004 06:31 PM
Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by CK, posted 08-04-2004 7:41 PM Buzsaw has replied
  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 5 of 28 (130463)
08-04-2004 8:11 PM 		Reply to: Message 4 by CK
08-04-2004 7:41 PM

Look at your own thread, the last ten pages were mostly shouting.
​
Most of the 16 lost pages were not shouting. There was a lot of work, thought and time put into the important information from both camps in these pages, including many photos. Yes, there were some out of order posts, but that happens in other volitile threads as well.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by CK, posted 08-04-2004 7:41 PM CK has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by CK, posted 08-04-2004 8:15 PM Buzsaw has replied
  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 6 of 28 (130465)
08-04-2004 8:14 PM 		Reply to: Message 4 by CK
08-04-2004 7:41 PM

The thread would still be open for reference
​
But there's nothing to keep it forward and handy for reference and referral. Why do you object to reopening the good pages, Charles?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by CK, posted 08-04-2004 7:41 PM CK has not replied
  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 12 of 28 (130531)
08-05-2004 12:02 AM 		Reply to: Message 7 by CK
08-04-2004 8:15 PM

If you want to debate this - sign up.
If you don't have any to add to the structure of the debate - I would ask you refrain from posting here on this topic.
​
Given your sour attitude, I'll refrain.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by CK, posted 08-04-2004 8:15 PM CK has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by NosyNed, posted 08-05-2004 1:36 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 15 by CK, posted 08-05-2004 5:36 AM Buzsaw has not replied
  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 18 of 28 (130712)
08-05-2004 1:51 PM 		Reply to: Message 13 by NosyNed
08-05-2004 1:36 AM

Re: LOL
Funny, very funny. Odd that this is a resort of one side much more than the other.
​
Sorry, but sometimes Charles's attitude is condescending and smart assed towards creationists. I just don't care to get into it with him. Then too, controlled debates are more restrictive and demanding for my liking.
​
This message has been edited by buzsaw, 08-05-2004 12:54 PM
This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by NosyNed, posted 08-05-2004 1:36 AM NosyNed has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024