Problems with an Infinite Universe

You start off by butchering Olber's Paradox and then it descends into technobabble.

This is a quote of yours from your earlier post. Do you really want this nonsense dissected?Leptons inside what? Electrons are leptons - leptons have no constituent particles (that we know of - and whatsmore there are good theoretical reasons why they may not.) What is inherent here? What relation does this have to "forces" that destroy and create universes? What "forces" are these? What creation and destruction of universes have you observed? What infinite chain?You see what I mean. One little section of your post and it's all gibberish that makes no point and even less sense. I'm sorry if this offends you but it is nonsense. You are stringing words together that you don't understand.Another example Where did you get this number? This is erroneous too.

no more responses from me. ELECTRONS ARE LEPTONS. Do you get this.Repeat after me - ELECTRONS ARE LEPTONS.Now repeat this one:ELECTRONS ARE POINT PARTICLES - they have no known constituents.DO A WEB SEARCH ON THIS - get of your arse and learn something. Don't give me a hard time because you are ignorant on this topic. That is why last night I took one paragraph of yours and ripped it apart.The six leptons are: electron, muon, tauon and their associated neutrinos.Until you at least make an effort to learn the basics, bugger off!

Sorry - I'm just grumpy as hell tonight. I've had food poisoning for the last 24 hours so it got me grumpy.I know others on here know this stuff - could someone else inform this guy that he is commpletely wrong here. Electrons are leptons.Man, a one minute web search would cure his problem.

you are positing an extra structure to the Universe that is not required. You are neddlessly complicating things - sort of an anti-Occams razor.You only augmment a model with extra structure if it helps you explain an observation or experiment.What possible basis do you have for adding this hypothetical?