Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe

I beleive that he tried discussing his "theory" on ISCID. It looked link typical crank pseudoscience to me there - plenty of armwaving about how great it was but little substance.Langan's activities in the "high IQ" world are a little more interesting. You might find this interesting - it presents the other side of a dispute involving Langan A Reply to Chris Langan
I've also heard that Langan qualified fo the Mega Society when he took the test for the SECOND time - the first time he used a pseudonym. That is against the rules and suggests that his IQ may not be as high as he claims.

All I will say of the theory is that the discussions at ISCID revealed a lot of unnecessary jargon and grandiose claims which were never supported. Both are hallmarks of crank science.You don't understand the problem with the IQ test. If you take a test for a second time you have an advantage - you already know the questions. That is wehy the rules state that only one attempt is allowed. It is not that Langan cheated the first time - it is that taking the test a second time IS cheating.

There was discussion on the Public forums. It's possible that I was wrong and it was the ARN forums that most of the discussion took place.

That's how ISCID works. But if you want to go into the grisly details you need to look at the Brainstorm forum.For instance this 22-page thread
http://www.iscid.org/boards/ubb-get_topic-f-6-t-000397.html