Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is the ‘missing link’ argument outdated?
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 9 of 11 (118298)
06-24-2004 1:42 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by MrHambre
06-24-2004 10:58 AM


Re: Darwin's Cinema
One important thing to remember is that both models are likely correct. If Natural Selection is right, we should see some things that show almost no change over time, some things that gradually change over time and others where there is a rapid change.
And that is pretty much what is seen. It's not one or the other, it is what happened within the population or period that you are examining.
We know that the outside forces and conditions have varied. There have been periods of major local change, major global change, minor change, long periods of stability and even environments that have remained almost identical over most of history.
Why should the record found in fossils be any different?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by MrHambre, posted 06-24-2004 10:58 AM MrHambre has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024