Leakey vs Johanson

yes. what you say fits well with hte passages found in Genesis which tells us of two two lines of evolution, one through Cain and the other eth. Both meet at Lamech again, and here you speak of one phase of that development:Gen. 4:18 And unto Enoch, (Australopithecus afarensis), was born Irad (a species concurrent with Australopithecus boisei): and Irad begat Mehujael (species concurrent with Australopithecus robustus): and Mehujael begat Methusael (Homo ergaster, an Early Homo erectus): and Methusael begat Lamech (a Homo antecessor).

Why?
Is it funny because it is different from interpretations of Genesis so radily held by church people and so equally ridiculed by science people?Did you ever read this section of Genesis closely and copare it with the growing body of information in the fossil record?Why would the present situation not be open to a third idea, when interpretation of Genesis is assumed absolutely true by 2 billion christians, and absolutely false by 2 million science people?In fact, don't you think we need a new paradigm which accommodates both these social institutions, Religion and Education?This one works. Why isn't it embraced? Do people just love to fight?Gen. 4:1 And Adam (Ramaphitecus Man) knew Eve (mother of all hominoids) his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain (Ardipithecus ramidus), and said, I have gotten a man, (a hominoid), from the LORD.