quote:
What is your proof/evidence?
I already wrote in these threads. But I still have to bring up the same phrases again. I hope you gathered the whole threads. Nevertheless, it looks as though you did not.
Like many others, I did read your threads and your proof/evidence is in itself not. Therefore, the question still stands.
quote:
Are you Gnostic? No. - Ctrl/Alt/Enter//"gnostic" means "she who thinks she could bring up the better knowledge by her own ways (or; her own invented ways)".
THE TRUTH: ONLY THE ETERNAL HIGHER YAHWEH OF THE HOSTS CAN BRING UP INSIDE YOUR BRAIN ALL THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE EVERLASTING THINGS WHICH REMAIN ETERNALLY.
actually....
Gnostic adj. 1. gnostic. Of, relating to, or possessing intellectual or spiritual knowledge
That one still stands as well.
As well as the rest that you didnt answer.
I wonder why you use semantics in your arguements?
semantics n. (used with a sing. or pl. verb). 1. Linguistics. The study or science of meaning in language forms. 2. Logic. The study of relationships between signs and symbols and what they represent.
Another form of Gnosticism, I suppose.
You claim you are against the missive wars on doctrines, not the flesh.
In as few words as possible, you will have to elaborate on that one, since it implies that you practice sola scripture.
Oh and btw, Bible is greek for Biblios...books. Since that is what it is. The books of sacred scripture.
again...
quote:
QUESTION:
What is your proof/evidence?
I already wrote in these threads. But I still have to bring up the same phrases again. I hope you gathered the whole threads. Nevertheless, it looks as though you did not.
Just a bit more please...It is important to point out that even the vast majority of Jews in the time of the New Testament did not speak Hebrew! Most did not even speak Aramaic, as the example of the Maccabees shows. The Maccabees fought very hard against the Helenization (Greek influence) of Judaism in the second century before Christ. They fought and died to preserve their Jewishness. Still, when it was time to record their accomplishments they chose Greek and not Hebrew as the language to use. This was because it was the universal language of their day. They also used the Greek words for God and not the Hebrew words for God. If the anti-Greek Maccabees used Greek, how much more likely it is that the writers of the New Testament also did so.
It is easy to show that most Jews of the first century did not even use a Hebrew Bible for the Old Testament; instead they used the Greek translation of the Old Testament--the Septuagint. How could they use a Hebrew language Bible when most of them did not speak Hebrew? Most quotes in the New Testament from the Old Testament are from the Septuagint. There is no reason that someone writing in Hebrew would quote from a Greek translation of the Old Testament.
The Ryland fragment is a part of the Gospel of John that has been found. It is in Greek and has been dated about 100-150 A.D. (ibid, p. 181). Since scholars believe the book of John was written in the late 90s, this fragment shows conclusively that it was written in Greek. Literally thousands of fragments of the New Testament have been preserved, but not one is written in Hebrew or Aramaic! (The Peshitta [Syriac Bible] is used by sacred name believers to prove that the New Testament was written in Aramaic. But the Peshitta is a translation from the Greek! If there were any Aramaic originals, why was this necessary? While it is possible that a few books were written in Aramaic most of the New Testament was written in Greek.
Most advocates of the doctrine of the sacred name teach that if you are wrong in your pronunciation, then your salvation is in danger! But what if the exact pronunciation of God's name has been lost? This is somewhat humorous since several groups of sacred name believers have different versions of the pronunciation of God's name. They include but are not limited to "Yahweh", "Yehweh", "Yahveh," "Yahvah," "Yahuweh," "Yah" and "YHWH." The two main names chosen by these people for the Messiah are "Yeshuah" and "Yahshua." If you pick the wrong name then most sacred name believers say you cannot be saved! But even if one is convinced of the validity of this doctrine, how does one choose what name to use? The consequences, the doctrine states, are eternal.
and again, I am aware of the meaning of the word/suffix 'sus',anyone can check that out to find that it means above and up... and agian, you are argueing semantics when you state...
quote:
Because the sons of men invented their dictionaries, telling you about the Medieval Latin word sus, they say that sus means swine. But they did not write to you the TRUE ORIGIN of the suffix SUS which means ABOVE and UP. Because they are BLIND leading blinds, and the PROOF/EVIDENCE: Is that they ALWAYS do IGNORE the TRUE ORIGIN OF THE SUFFIX SUS [which means ABOVE AND UP]. Always Negligence and Ignorance you can hope from them sons of men and their very SWINE DEEDS inside their swine-dictionaries.
So that arguement is moot. Also, if you understand Astosnomy then the words up and down are relative. The meaning is there and what it means. Hebrew words have more than one meaning, Greek words have more than one meaning, as well as English words have more than one meaning. All one need do is look it up, and one will find the answer.
The English word BUM has several meanings...for example. 1. a tramp, vagrant. 2. the buttocks.
Or the word ARM...1. an upper limb of the human body.
2. Something, such as a sleeve on a garment or a
support on a chair.
3. an administrative or functional branch
4. a reletively narrow extension jutting out from a
large mass.
5. an idiom..such as "an arm and a leg."
6. a weapon, especially a firearm.
I still wait.
This message has been edited by Ricka, 05-23-2004 12:19 PM
This message has been edited by Ricka, 05-23-2004 03:01 PM
™ Version 4.2
