Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Asimov on the Flood
joz
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 8 (10780)
06-01-2002 1:55 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by TrueCreation
06-01-2002 12:49 AM


What he is describing TC is a Tsunami (japaneese term literaly meaning harbour wave, though technicaly a soliton rather than a wave)....
Basically at a destructive/covergent (sorry about terminology i have just had a nice night in with a bottle of Absolut) margin if there is a sudden slip on the fault line a region of the seafloor is rapidly displaced upwards, since fluids are incompressible (this is how brakes in cars work, by transmitting pressure through fluids) this displacement is duplicated on the surface. This distortion then spreads out as a soliton, not a wave per se as it has no wavelength...
Out at sea a tsunami may (in some cases) have an amplitude of just .5 metres but a *wavelength* (not a true wavelength per se as previously noted) of around 300 metres (this is a sort of average, each tsunami is unique)....
But as the soliton reaches the rapidly shallower waters of the shore line its *wavelength* decreases and its magnitude increases literaly looking like a wall of water appearing from nowhere....
If Joe could pop by and enlighten us I for one would be interested to see if there is a boundary he thinks could be responsible for such an event in the locale or even if this hypothesis is contradicted by other geological evidence...
Interesting at any rate.....
[edited to fix C2H5.OH induced errors]
[This message has been edited by joz, 06-01-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by TrueCreation, posted 06-01-2002 12:49 AM TrueCreation has not replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 8 (10783)
06-01-2002 3:45 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Daydreamer
06-01-2002 3:18 AM


You are using the wrong formulae bud, F = ma (or more accurately F is proportional to dP/dt) isn`t what you want...
That said I can`t remember the right equations off hand, but they are a composite of Lord Raleighs work on solitons with application of Bernoullis work on potential flow....
Sorry bud but its late night and I am half baked and thats all you are gonna get out of me for now....
Hope that puts you on the right track...
[added by edit: If you convert to SI instead of imperial units density of water is 1 kilogram per liter or 1 metric ton (1000 Kg) per m3]
[This message has been edited by joz, 06-01-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Daydreamer, posted 06-01-2002 3:18 AM Daydreamer has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024