Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 57 (9175 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: sirs
Post Volume: Total: 917,649 Year: 4,906/9,624 Month: 254/427 Week: 0/64 Day: 0/8 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Leakey vs Johanson
Andya Primanda
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 17 (10458)
05-28-2002 6:28 AM


Currently I am translating a book by Richard Leakey. One of the first things to be obvious is that Leakey has a bias; he does not consider any australopithecines to be directly ancestral to Homo sapiens. I can't help but feel that he may be wrong, however he cites studies of their middle ear, posture, rib cage, etc. to back up his position.
On the other hand, Donald Johanson, discoverer of Lucy, seems to be on the opposite camp, by holding that australopithecines did become humans. However I must tell you (embarrassedly) that I haven't read much from him, much less his views against Leakey.
Leakey pointed that there should be another Homo species which gave rise to Homo habilis, which he thought could not have descended from australopithecines. This is maybe his weak point for no such fossil have been found.
Does anybody know more about this?

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Andor, posted 06-03-2002 9:02 AM Andya Primanda has not replied
 Message 3 by Percy, posted 06-04-2002 10:33 AM Andya Primanda has not replied
 Message 5 by The General, posted 07-30-2003 3:25 AM Andya Primanda has not replied
 Message 7 by fighterspirt, posted 08-02-2003 3:55 AM Andya Primanda has not replied
 Message 11 by MarkAustin, posted 08-15-2003 5:52 PM Andya Primanda has not replied
 Message 13 by Phobos, posted 06-16-2004 5:11 PM Andya Primanda has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024