Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Modern Sunken Forests Discredit Fossilization Argument
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 13 of 15 (104270)
04-30-2004 3:52 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by John Paul
04-30-2004 12:02 PM


quote:
Of course such fossils are possible- we found them! What happens if a tree is half buried? If that tree dies it will rot (the part that is exposed) and that is what YECs are saying. If a lava flow buries a tree without burning it I would be impressed. If a mudslide buries it well that isn't gradual. There aren't many trees around sand dunes...
The whole point is it takes rapid burial to have any chance of fossilization.
--Not necessarily. Fossilization simply requires the necessary environmental conditions (of course). The rate of burial is not the only possible method by which fossilization is attained--as is clear from any geological analysis of the documented "fossil forests" (eg. Yellowstone and Joggins). Even a period of rapid burial does not necessarily imply fossilization of that which is buried--subsequent subsurface decay by soil microorganisms, bioturbation, soil alkalinity/acidity, etc. can destroy the organism as well as traces of them.
--Edited for clarity.
Cheers,
-Chris Grose
[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 04-30-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by John Paul, posted 04-30-2004 12:02 PM John Paul has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024