Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Punk Eek for Redwolf
mark24
Member (Idle past 5195 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 46 of 50 (103157)
04-27-2004 6:33 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by redwolf
04-22-2004 9:34 PM


Re: microevolution does not prove toe or macroevolution
Redwolf,
Can we assume from your lack of response in this thread, but participation in others in this forum, that you concede that the argument you made ragarding PE was flawed?
Mark
[This message has been edited by mark24, 04-27-2004]

"Physical Reality of Matchette’s EVOLUTIONARY zero-atom-unit in a transcendental c/e illusion" - Brad McFall

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by redwolf, posted 04-22-2004 9:34 PM redwolf has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by RAZD, posted 04-27-2004 6:51 PM mark24 has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 47 of 50 (103164)
04-27-2004 6:51 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by mark24
04-27-2004 6:33 PM


Re: microevolution does not prove toe or macroevolution
I also notice he didn't touch the Differential Dispersal Of Introduced Species (Re: Aspect of Punctuated Equilibrium) topic that addresses a particular part of punk eek that he seemed to have trouble with.
I'd say unable to refute therefore unwilling to answer.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by mark24, posted 04-27-2004 6:33 PM mark24 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by Loudmouth, posted 04-27-2004 7:17 PM RAZD has replied

  
Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 48 of 50 (103168)
04-27-2004 7:17 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by RAZD
04-27-2004 6:51 PM


Re: microevolution does not prove toe or macroevolution
quote:
I'd say unable to refute therefore unwilling to answer.
Redwolf gave it a go, which shouldn't be discouraged by ridiculing him for not continuing. Creationists willing to argue in a somewhat comprehensible fashion are few and far between. The last thing we want is for the creationists to take their ball and go home (for those familiar with South Park "Screw you guys, I'm going hooooome"). Imagine how boring it would be if only evo's posted. Blah, it would be Star Trek without the Klingons.
Of course, geeky sci-fi readers may realize that the Bene Gesserit probably said it best: (paraphrase) "Sometimes silence is the best thing to say."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by RAZD, posted 04-27-2004 6:51 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by mark24, posted 04-27-2004 7:31 PM Loudmouth has not replied
 Message 50 by RAZD, posted 04-27-2004 11:25 PM Loudmouth has not replied

  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5195 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 49 of 50 (103174)
04-27-2004 7:31 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Loudmouth
04-27-2004 7:17 PM


Re: microevolution does not prove toe or macroevolution
Loudmouth,
Redwolfs original post was pretty arrogant, & deserves to be treated so.
I always saw myself as more of a Harkonnen than Atreides, or one of the sisters .
Mark
[This message has been edited by mark24, 04-27-2004]

"Physical Reality of Matchette’s EVOLUTIONARY zero-atom-unit in a transcendental c/e illusion" - Brad McFall

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Loudmouth, posted 04-27-2004 7:17 PM Loudmouth has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 50 of 50 (103232)
04-27-2004 11:25 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Loudmouth
04-27-2004 7:17 PM


Re: microevolution does not prove toe or macroevolution
unable means out of answers, which can happen to anyone who gets out of their depth - it's happened to me. more of an observation than ridicule. has to do with the cognitive consonance thing.
I was hoping for some interaction on the differential dispersal bit

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Loudmouth, posted 04-27-2004 7:17 PM Loudmouth has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024