A little rant for desdamona

I have recently started a new thread (Creationists: Why is Evolution Bad Science?) which may be perfect for desdamona. I am really curious why she thinks that evolutionary sciences, which follows the same methodologies as other branches of science, fails to pass as good science. Perhaps this topic can clear up some of the misconceptions that desdamona has about science and evolutionary sciences in particular.[This message has been edited by Loudmouth, 04-22-2004]

quote:

---

Loudmouth, haven't you learned by now that desdamona is incapable of staying on topic? She will probably start ranting about how the bible is 100% true and evolution is 100% false without giving any explanation.

---

Which would be the point of the thread. She must defend what she calls good science in a side by side comparison with what she considers bad science. All of this sans Bible. She already claims that she knows what good science is, and I am assuming this is without reference to the Bible. The big question is does she judge the validity of a scientific theory by the methodology or the conclusions.