Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationists acknowledge evolution makes sense
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 51 of 63 (10137)
05-21-2002 9:22 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by Mister Pamboli
05-21-2002 12:42 PM


Although rabbits are not ruminants they do eat their own pellets as pointed out by AIG and we would hence suspect that this was categrized as the Hebrew 'alah'.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/3725.asp

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Mister Pamboli, posted 05-21-2002 12:42 PM Mister Pamboli has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Joe Meert, posted 05-21-2002 10:39 PM Tranquility Base has replied
 Message 57 by Mister Pamboli, posted 05-21-2002 11:32 PM Tranquility Base has replied

  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 53 of 63 (10149)
05-21-2002 10:16 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by Mister Pamboli
05-21-2002 9:26 PM


^ I agree now - See #51.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Mister Pamboli, posted 05-21-2002 9:26 PM Mister Pamboli has not replied

  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 56 of 63 (10156)
05-21-2002 11:07 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by Joe Meert
05-21-2002 10:39 PM


You obviuously haven't ahd a close look at rabbit feces joe - it's basically grass. And that's obviously the opinion of the rabbits!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Joe Meert, posted 05-21-2002 10:39 PM Joe Meert has not replied

  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 59 of 63 (10166)
05-22-2002 12:02 AM
Reply to: Message 57 by Mister Pamboli
05-21-2002 11:32 PM


What you're saying is very compelling but it's not absolute proof that the term wasnt use to indicate that, either way, these animals redigested their food! Your 'meaning of the words' comes from usage of course - or do you have an ancient Hebrew dictionary written back then? Common usage dictates meaning and now it may be actual cud regurgitation, at an earlier point it may have been more incusive regardless of the sub-meanings of parts of the word.
Words become definitions that are only as useful as their common usage.
[This message has been edited by Tranquility Base, 05-21-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Mister Pamboli, posted 05-21-2002 11:32 PM Mister Pamboli has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by Joe Meert, posted 05-22-2002 12:05 AM Tranquility Base has not replied

  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 62 of 63 (10172)
05-22-2002 12:14 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by Joe Meert
05-22-2002 12:09 AM


^ You think I shouldn't answer Pamboli's posts? I like Pambolli.
I don't think anyone on the entire planet doubts that the Bible descibes a story about a flood that covered the highest mountains, that a man built a large boat and took examples of all animals on board and that it saved their lives!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Joe Meert, posted 05-22-2002 12:09 AM Joe Meert has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by Joe Meert, posted 05-22-2002 12:20 AM Tranquility Base has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024