You appear to have replied to Sylas but not me on this point. Why is that? In any event, I take it that your assertion concerning Bechtel/ACE is unsupported by factual evidence, and hence cannot be used as valid support for your claim. Honesty would require you to retract the claim until/unless it is supported.
Moreover, in real life, you could only rope or chain so many humans, elephants, oxen, or anything else together before the question of how to organize such an effort reached critical mass, the weight of the chains also a critical problem. You'd never get that many elephants or whatever to pull together properly, even if it were possible, which it isn't.
Another unsupported assertion. Please document where the experiment was performed, or the calculation. Your argument from personal incredulity is getting very thin, and I am unwilling to take your unsubstantiated word for anything at this point. In fact, if you look at the picture Sylas posted, you can see how it was done - four (or possibly more) lines of "pullers". It is certainly not difficult to see how that could be organized - as long as the lines were organized so that each was pulling on the same vector. What's even more revealing about that picture is the guy standing at the foot of the statue who appears to be pouring something in front of the sledge. Lubricant, maybe - just what the modern tests have shown is needed? You seem to be conflating "ancient" = "stupid". BTW - your lack of knowledge is showing in this area, as you have neglected to bring up the one argument against the theory (that human power is sufficient) that has any real validity. I leave you to figure out what that is.