menes777 writes:
I suspect that in the experiment that they used fish the fish died pretty rapidly so they aren't showing it.
Well, many species of sea-life can survive brackish waters. This is already known.
Their test will, at best, prove what biologists have already shown.
But it won't add any new evidence to support a global flood.
To test a single aspect (i.e. salt levels) while ignoring all the other environmental changes is pointless (...when researching a global flood).
Animals trying to survive a global flood would have
many environmental changes to cope with.
If I was to submerge myself in water and survive, does that mean I can survive at the bottom of the Atlantic ocean? No.
If I can survive in free-fall, does that mean I can survive in space? No.
menes777 writes:
That place has flipped it's lid though, almost every atheist that frequented the place (except me because I no longer debate there) has been banned for some BS excuse or another.
I like the fact that you can get banned for equivocation.
Equivocation is sooo offensive!!
I have taken to giving answers on their web-page, but not debating much.
This appears to have made it more difficult for them to justify banning me.
And that way, other people can see that there are answers to the creo's questions - even if the creo's themselves won't accept them.
Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!