Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,386 Year: 3,643/9,624 Month: 514/974 Week: 127/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   destination unknown :BUMP LARNI
pelican
Member (Idle past 5006 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 1 of 9 (455269)
02-11-2008 6:40 PM


paula writes:
We are feeling, thinking, conscious beings experienced through a living body. I believe all three incorporated create our life experiences. Could this belief be proved/disproved?
Of course we have an opportunity to put the verasity of your belief to the test.
Step one: define feeling, thinking and consciousness.
B: define a human.
Step three: correlate the two.
Re: true beliefs?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would be happy to answer your questions if you are sincere and willing to consider my answers. However, would this be on topic for this thread?
Re: true beliefs?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start a new thread and I will meet you there.
Guns blazin'
Hi Larni, I have my bullet proof vest on. No aimimg at my head. My belief is more complicated than meets the eye.
1. Feeling
An emotional state or disposition; an emotion: expressed deep feeling.
1a. Thinking
the capacity to reason
1c.Consciousness
an alert cognitive state in which you are aware of yourself and your situation;
These are the simplified definitions in context with my belief.
2. Human (now this is a bit more difficult to define )
Meaning of human
Definitions of human
1. [adj] - relating to a person
2. [adj] - characteristic of humanity
3. [adj] - having human form or attributes as opposed to those of animals or divine beings
Quotes - Example use of the word human
1. human beings
2. the human body
3. human kindness
4. human frailty
5. human nature
6. the experiment was conducted on 6 monkeys and 2 human subjects
Step 3 will depend on agreement of the definitions and an expansion of the same.
E.G Emotions/feelings. Are they energy? What different forms do they appear as? Where do they come from? How are they experienced? How do we know the name of the feeling being experienced? How do they affect our lives?
Are you bored? ha ha ha See what I mean? Complex.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by New Cat's Eye, posted 02-11-2008 7:19 PM pelican has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 9 (455278)
02-11-2008 7:19 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by pelican
02-11-2008 6:40 PM


Step 3 will depend on agreement of the definitions and an expansion of the same.
You could still correlate the two based on an assumption that the definitions are agreed upon. Then, if someone has a problem with a definition, you just hash it out. If the correlation changes, you adjust accordingly. There's really no reason to withhold it (unless you don't have it). Besides, what if Larni cannot post for a week-or-so? You'd rather it sit un-replied over the opportunity to hear from others?
E.G Emotions/feelings. Are they energy? What different forms do they appear as? Where do they come from? How are they experienced? How do we know the name of the feeling being experienced? How do they affect our lives?
You should just read up on emotions and how they are produced by the Nervous System via neurons. <-- questions.
Are you bored? ha ha ha See what I mean? Complex.
Chit. That's nothing. This is complex.

Science fails to recognize the single most potent element of human existence.
Letting the reigns go to the unfolding is faith, faith, faith, faith.
Science has failed our world.
Science has failed our Mother Earth.
-System of a Down, "Science"
He who makes a beast out of himself, gets rid of the pain of being a man.
-Avenged Sevenfold, "Bat Country"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by pelican, posted 02-11-2008 6:40 PM pelican has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by pelican, posted 02-11-2008 9:16 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
pelican
Member (Idle past 5006 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 3 of 9 (455317)
02-11-2008 9:16 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by New Cat's Eye
02-11-2008 7:19 PM


wise words
The "proof" of that theory exists, it is just not going to be simple. This is one of those cases where you're going to have to trust the experts.
Am I not the expert on my beliefs? I did not pluck them out of thin air. You'll have to trust me or not. You have the remote.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by New Cat's Eye, posted 02-11-2008 7:19 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by New Cat's Eye, posted 02-11-2008 9:48 PM pelican has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 9 (455328)
02-11-2008 9:48 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by pelican
02-11-2008 9:16 PM


Re: wise words
The "proof" of that theory exists, it is just not going to be simple. This is one of those cases where you're going to have to trust the experts.
Did I say that? A simple quote insinuates that I did, FYI.
Am I not the expert on my beliefs?
Of course you are the expert on your own beliefs, but you are not the expert on whether or not your beliefs conform to reality.
For example, a schizophrenic would be an expert on their own beliefs, but their psychiatrist would be the expert on whether or not their beliefs conform to reality. I'm not calling you schizo, but simply illustrating the point that you aren't the expert on how true your beliefs are. Of course you think your beliefs are true (otherwise you wouldn't believe them, right?), but if you believe in a Flat Earth, others could confidently say that your beliefs do not conform to reality. Make sense?
I did not pluck them out of thin air.
Maybe not, but how can I tell if your beliefs do or do not conform to reality? I have to check them against my beliefs and the beliefs of others.
If your beliefs are "wacko" then we can assume they are false. We may not be correct, of course, but your going to have to provide strong evidence to the contrary to convince us.
You'll have to trust me or not.
You have to earn my trust. The default is not.
You have the remote.
Actually, you have it. Start clicking. Take a position and make an argument. Then I'll have something to respond too.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by pelican, posted 02-11-2008 9:16 PM pelican has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by pelican, posted 02-11-2008 10:08 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
pelican
Member (Idle past 5006 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 5 of 9 (455333)
02-11-2008 10:08 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by New Cat's Eye
02-11-2008 9:48 PM


Re: wise words
Maybe not, but how can I tell if your beliefs do or do not conform to reality? I have to check them against my beliefs and the beliefs of others.
My beliefs do conform to my reality as yours do for you. This is not a consensus of opinion considered true by the majority. This is a concensus of opinion by a minority of one. I am not using science or religion as my evidense. Just my life.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by New Cat's Eye, posted 02-11-2008 9:48 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Blue Jay, posted 02-11-2008 10:29 PM pelican has not replied
 Message 7 by New Cat's Eye, posted 02-12-2008 9:56 AM pelican has replied

  
Blue Jay
Member (Idle past 2718 days)
Posts: 2843
From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts
Joined: 02-04-2008


Message 6 of 9 (455338)
02-11-2008 10:29 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by pelican
02-11-2008 10:08 PM


Re: wise words
My beliefs do conform to my reality as yours do for you.
This is kind of unfair, Paula Rose. Your personal "reality" is inevitably defined only by you in an abstract sense that none of us is qualified to debate with you about. To be usable at all in this context, the word "reality" has to be defined as an entity external to any and all debaters. In other words, it has to be based on objective evidence.
The way you're using the word "reality" clearly indicates that you are talking about the collective total of your own experiences, feelings and viewpoints, which any one of us could summarize and diagnose as we please. There is no possible way you can expect a legitimate debate on this issue.

Signed,
Nobody Important (just Bluejay)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by pelican, posted 02-11-2008 10:08 PM pelican has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 9 (455388)
02-12-2008 9:56 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by pelican
02-11-2008 10:08 PM


Re: wise words
My beliefs do conform to my reality as yours do for you.
I'm not talking about your beliefs confroming to your reality. I'm talking about your beliefs conforming to the one true reality.
This is not a consensus of opinion considered true by the majority.
That's a good indication that its erroneous. Not necessarily, but still its an indication.
This is a concensus of opinion by a minority of one. I am not using science or religion as my evidense. Just my life.
But how can you tell if your beliefs conform to the one true reality?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by pelican, posted 02-11-2008 10:08 PM pelican has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by pelican, posted 02-12-2008 11:47 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
pelican
Member (Idle past 5006 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 8 of 9 (455421)
02-12-2008 11:47 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by New Cat's Eye
02-12-2008 9:56 AM


Re: wise words
But how can you tell if your beliefs conform to the one true reality?
The floor is yours. What is the ONE TRUE REALITY?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by New Cat's Eye, posted 02-12-2008 9:56 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by New Cat's Eye, posted 02-12-2008 12:10 PM pelican has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 9 (455426)
02-12-2008 12:10 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by pelican
02-12-2008 11:47 AM


Re: wise words
The floor is yours. What is the ONE TRUE REALITY?
Why are you so scared to have the floor?
This is your thread. Say something. Give me something I can reply too.
Nobody, as in one person, can really know the one true reality. We all get our own little piece of it. We should work together and confirm each others ideas and come to a consensus on what we think is most likely the one true reality.
Science has a method of doing this. And judging it by its fruits, its the best one we got.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by pelican, posted 02-12-2008 11:47 AM pelican has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024