Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,417 Year: 3,674/9,624 Month: 545/974 Week: 158/276 Day: 32/23 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Creationist Method
ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 91 of 93 (424938)
09-29-2007 11:34 AM
Reply to: Message 90 by Rob
09-29-2007 10:26 AM


Re: The ID Method
Rob writes:
It's not spontaneous as they've told you. It's spontaneous only after intelligent engineers manipulate the clay and introduce nucleobases and other components that cannot be accounted for in the clays themselves.
Maybe you're misunderstanding the word "spontaneous". As used by chemists, it means that the reaction will proceed by itself if all the materials are there and the conditions are right.
It doesn't matter whether the materials were placed there intelligently or stupidly. It doesn't require anybody in a lab coat to nudge the molecules together with tweezers.
It's just a matter of the right things being together in the right place at the right time.

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by Rob, posted 09-29-2007 10:26 AM Rob has not replied

  
Lithodid-Man
Member (Idle past 2952 days)
Posts: 504
From: Juneau, Alaska, USA
Joined: 03-22-2004


Message 92 of 93 (425052)
09-30-2007 5:39 AM
Reply to: Message 90 by Rob
09-29-2007 10:26 AM


Re: The ID Method
Rob writes:
Actually, it is clip 6 that covers the RNA stuff your talking about. I don't know why you would have problems with the other clips. You might just have to refresh the page.
Actually, if I am numbering them correctly, video six does not address this issue at all. The problem I am having is YouTube issuing a "This video is no longer available" message.
Rob writes:
And RNA does not spontaniously form in clays. It forms when minerals are exposed to nucleobases (assumed to be prexisting) and other catalyzing components.
Um, duh(?) What do you think spontaneous means in biochem? It is like if I said if you put two roosters in a pit together they will spontaneously fight, and you answered "No, it is not spontaneous, they only fight when they add the second rooster" Clays in the proper environment tend to organize nucleotides in a way that is remarkably similar and sometimes identical with existing RNA sequences. Those sequences, if in the right order, may catalyze the formation of identical sequences and could be a way for the first self-replicating molecule to have originated.
The link you provided is a 'twofer' for me, it not only invalidates your claim (probably should read beyond the intro, just a hint) but is an awesome and concise pop-science reference I will use in the future. So thank you for that!

"I have seen so far because I have stood on the bloated corpses of my competitors" - Dr Burgess Bowder

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by Rob, posted 09-29-2007 10:26 AM Rob has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1426 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 93 of 93 (425068)
09-30-2007 8:44 AM
Reply to: Message 90 by Rob
09-29-2007 10:26 AM


Rob's Example
It's not spontaneous as they've told us or implied. It's spontaneous only after intelligent engineers manipulate the clay and introduce nucleobases and other components that cannot be accounted for in the clays themselves.
The interest in clay templates for RNA synthesis is very simmilar to the interest in carbonaceous meteorites. You may want to read what we have already covered in a thread on that subject: http://EvC Forum: Murchison Meteor Questions -->EvC Forum: Murchison Meteor Questions
Yes, in particular pay attention to the analogy of the falling rock and the importance of the "intelligent designer" to the progress of the rock once it has started falling.
This is a typical example of another creationist\IDologist method: when an argument has been totally refuted on one thread take it to a different thread and start all over again.
What is ironic\humorous is that this is done while debating on off-topic digression on a thread where the topic is creationist methods of debate.
Enjoy.

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by Rob, posted 09-29-2007 10:26 AM Rob has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024