Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,332 Year: 3,589/9,624 Month: 460/974 Week: 73/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Bible's Flat Earth
Kapyong
Member (Idle past 3460 days)
Posts: 344
Joined: 05-22-2003


Message 91 of 473 (499681)
02-19-2009 6:31 PM
Reply to: Message 85 by Peg
02-19-2009 5:52 PM


Re: The Literal Interpretation is a Flat Earth
Gday,
Peg writes:
what is the hebrew word for ball and where in the scriptures is it used?
Peg - it's already been cited above.
Are you actually READING this thread ?
There IS a word for "sphere" or "ball" in Hebrew (dwr), and it is used in Isaiah 22:18 -
"He will surely turn violently and toss you like a ball into a large country;"
But the word used for circle is "chuwg" - it means a flat circle, NOT a sphere.
And the OT uses the word for "flat circle" for the earth when it COULD have used the word for "sphere".
Clear and present evidence that the OT writers thought the earth was flat, NOT a sphere.
Round, yes.
Round and flat like a disk.
But not a sphere.
Coupled with the numerous other references which imply the earth as flat, this shows conclusively that the OT writers thought the world was flat.
Kapyong

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by Peg, posted 02-19-2009 5:52 PM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by Peg, posted 02-19-2009 7:22 PM Kapyong has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 92 of 473 (499686)
02-19-2009 7:22 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by Kapyong
02-19-2009 6:31 PM


Re: The Literal Interpretation is a Flat Earth
Kapyong writes:
Peg - it's already been cited above.
Are you actually READING this thread ?
There IS a word for "sphere" or "ball" in Hebrew (dwr), and it is used in Isaiah 22:18 -
"He will surely turn violently and toss you like a ball into a large country;"
and this is the dilema, One Hebrew word for generation is dohr, corresponding to the Aramaic dar.
Dohr comes from a root verb meaning 'stack in a circle' or 'move around' and thus has a basic underlying meaning of 'circle.'
and the related word dur means 'ball.'
So some languages have muliple words for the same thing and others have multiple meanings for the same word
And just because today 'circle' means a 2d object, does not mean that it was the same thing in ancient times
EG, what is a compass today? Most people know a compass to be a navigational instrument
but in ancient times is was an instrument used by a carpenter or another craftsman to mark or inscribe a circle or an arc on wood or some other material. The only Biblical reference to a compass is at Isaiah 44:13 where it says 'with a compass he keeps tracing it out...'
Is it right for the translators to apply 'compass' to this verse when the thing that we know as a compass is completely different to what is being used as a compass back then?
.
Or perhaps we should do what is being done in regard to the word 'circle' and interpret that the ancients had a navigational device making them much more technologically advanced then we give them credit for?
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by Kapyong, posted 02-19-2009 6:31 PM Kapyong has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by shalamabobbi, posted 02-19-2009 7:41 PM Peg has replied
 Message 96 by Kapyong, posted 02-20-2009 12:47 AM Peg has not replied

  
shalamabobbi
Member (Idle past 2867 days)
Posts: 397
Joined: 01-10-2009


Message 93 of 473 (499690)
02-19-2009 7:41 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by Peg
02-19-2009 7:22 PM


Re: The Literal Interpretation is a Flat Earth
Isaiah 38:8 Behold, I will bring again the shadow of the degrees, which is gone down in the sun dial of Ahaz, ten degrees backward. So the sun returned ten degrees, by which degrees it was gone down.
So Isaiah can't decide whether the earth is a sphere and rotates or whether it is flat and the sun does the moving?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by Peg, posted 02-19-2009 7:22 PM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by Theodoric, posted 02-19-2009 7:46 PM shalamabobbi has not replied
 Message 101 by Peg, posted 02-20-2009 1:40 AM shalamabobbi has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9130
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 94 of 473 (499691)
02-19-2009 7:46 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by shalamabobbi
02-19-2009 7:41 PM


Re: The Literal Interpretation is a Flat Earth
I am sure this was just a metaphor. Oh unless it is something that needs to be taken literally in order for the book to be inerrant.
Peg,
Just give me a primer so I know what parts of this book should be taken literal and which parts should be taken metaphorical.
Must be easy. You and buzz seem to have no problem determining what the distinction is. Once you can do this I am sure all of this misunderstanding will go away.
Thanks. Once I get this lesson maybe your arguments won't seem so random and senseless.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by shalamabobbi, posted 02-19-2009 7:41 PM shalamabobbi has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 102 by Peg, posted 02-20-2009 1:55 AM Theodoric has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 95 of 473 (499717)
02-20-2009 12:28 AM
Reply to: Message 78 by kuresu
02-19-2009 1:45 PM


Re: The Literal Interpretation is a Flat Earth
kuresu writes:
Or are you suggesting that people 3000 years ago didn't fully understand the difference between a circle and a sphere?
ABE: I realize Euclid's Elements was written ~300 BCE and the biblical texts are older, but Euclid was really the first to systematically compile these geographic axioms. In other words, the knowledge of what a circle and sphere is is certainly older, and the concept of spherical earth dates back to ~600 BCE, though it wasn't until Aristotle that we really get any strong proof for the concept. If you know what a sphere is in 600BCE, you certainly know what a circle is, so I don't really see how you can excuse the language to any great deal if these people were familiar with greek ideas. A circle is a circle is a circle . . .and not a sphere.
Kuresu, Did you read this paragraph in my message 64, stating the reasons circle would likely be used by Isaiah in the context of his message if he knew the earth was a sphere? Likely he was writing of the circular shape of the earth, i.e. the curvature. I neglected to state also that there is not only no Hebrew sphere/spherical but also no Hebrew curve/curvature. Thus in order to describe the curvature of the earth, the best choice of words would have been circle to depict the curvature of the earth. One would not refer to the earth as ballular, but it would be referred to as circular, depicting the curvature of a sphere since there was not sphere word.
Admittedly, this does not necessarily prove that he thought the earth was a sphere, but it does refute the argument that his usage of circle had to mean it was flat or a dome and not a sphere.
Buzsaw said in 64:
Of necessity, in translating the Hebrew, due to the limited vocabulary, many Hebrew words have multiple meanings which must be understood and translated relative to context. A good example of this are the English terms, sphere/spherical, ball, circle/circular and curve/curvature. (Note, relative to ball, that nothing is said to be ballical or ballular, so relative to the shape of the planet, ball doesn't fit the ticket for circle/circular or sphere/spherical. Thus circle was used by the prophet Isaiah to describe the curvature of the earth.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by kuresu, posted 02-19-2009 1:45 PM kuresu has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by Kapyong, posted 02-20-2009 12:52 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Kapyong
Member (Idle past 3460 days)
Posts: 344
Joined: 05-22-2003


Message 96 of 473 (499720)
02-20-2009 12:47 AM
Reply to: Message 92 by Peg
02-19-2009 7:22 PM


Re: The Literal Interpretation is a Flat Earth
Gday,
Peg writes:
and this is the dilema, One Hebrew word for generation is dohr, corresponding to the Aramaic dar.
Dohr comes from a root verb meaning 'stack in a circle' or 'move around' and thus has a basic underlying meaning of 'circle.'
and the related word dur means 'ball.'
Yes, it means 'ball' or sphere.
But now you are trying to redefine the word for 'sphere' to mean 'circle',
after you redefined the word for 'circle' to mean 'sphere'.
But the facts are clear :
* there is a word for 'sphere'
* there is a word for 'circle'
* the OT uses the word for circle, NOT sphere
Because the writers thought the earth was flat.
Kapyong

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by Peg, posted 02-19-2009 7:22 PM Peg has not replied

  
Kapyong
Member (Idle past 3460 days)
Posts: 344
Joined: 05-22-2003


Message 97 of 473 (499721)
02-20-2009 12:52 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by Buzsaw
02-20-2009 12:28 AM


Re: The Literal Interpretation is a Flat Earth
Hi all,
Buzsaw writes:
I neglected to state also that there is not only no Hebrew sphere/spherical
So, whereas in Peg's world :
'sphere' means circle, and
'circle' means sphere.
In Buzsaw's world,
'sphere' doesn't even exist.
Even after numerous posts discussing the word, it's meaning, it's translation, and even it's usage in the bible - even then, Buzsaw can claim with a straight face there is no such word.
How can one possibly answer that?
Kapyong
Edited by Kapyong, : Minor fixes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Buzsaw, posted 02-20-2009 12:28 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
thingamabob
Junior Member (Idle past 2635 days)
Posts: 23
From: New Jerusalem
Joined: 02-26-2009


Message 98 of 473 (499722)
02-20-2009 1:05 AM


Hi,
Maybe Isaiah was right all along he did know what a ball was and he did not use that in 40:22.
Isaiah said, "he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth".
If I am not mistaken there is only one place on earth that there is a perfect circle and that is at the equator.
thing

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by DrJones*, posted 02-20-2009 1:14 AM thingamabob has replied
 Message 108 by Chiroptera, posted 02-20-2009 8:33 AM thingamabob has not replied

  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2284
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 99 of 473 (499725)
02-20-2009 1:14 AM
Reply to: Message 98 by thingamabob
02-20-2009 1:05 AM


If I am not mistaken there is only one place on earth that there is a perfect circle and that is at the equator.
And you'd be wrong as the Earth is not a perfect sphere, but rather is an oblate spheriod, and thus the equator is not a perfect circle.

soon I discovered that this rock thing was true
Jerry Lee Lewis was the devil
Jesus was an architect previous to his career as a prophet
All of a sudden i found myself in love with the world
And so there was only one thing I could do
Was ding a ding dang my dang along ling long - Jesus Built my Hotrod Ministry

Live every week like it's Shark Week! - Tracey Jordan
Just a monkey in a long line of kings. - Matthew Good
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist! - Get Your War On
*not an actual doctor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by thingamabob, posted 02-20-2009 1:05 AM thingamabob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by anglagard, posted 02-20-2009 2:50 AM DrJones* has not replied
 Message 111 by thingamabob, posted 02-20-2009 10:23 AM DrJones* has not replied
 Message 117 by xongsmith, posted 02-20-2009 11:59 AM DrJones* has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 100 of 473 (499727)
02-20-2009 1:30 AM
Reply to: Message 88 by shalamabobbi
02-19-2009 6:16 PM


Re: The Literal Interpretation is a Flat Earth
shalamabobbi writes:
Joshua 10:13 And the sun stood still,
So it is the sun that moves and not the earth, which is flat, and if you believe otherwise well, you are not a true believer..
how do get 'flat' from that verse???
seriously, all it says is that the sun stood still.
From an earthly perspective, it is the sun that appears to move across the sky... so the writers were simply explaining the things they saw from the perspective that they saw them
its called Perspective

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by shalamabobbi, posted 02-19-2009 6:16 PM shalamabobbi has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by shalamabobbi, posted 02-20-2009 2:28 AM Peg has replied
 Message 120 by Dman, posted 02-20-2009 12:56 PM Peg has replied
 Message 299 by Michamus, posted 03-24-2009 12:43 AM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 101 of 473 (499728)
02-20-2009 1:40 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by shalamabobbi
02-19-2009 7:41 PM


Re: The Literal Interpretation is a Flat Earth
shalamabobbi writes:
Isaiah 38:8 Behold, I will bring again the shadow of the degrees, which is gone down in the sun dial of Ahaz, ten degrees backward. So the sun returned ten degrees, by which degrees it was gone down.
(Isaiah 38:8) 'Here I am making the shadow of the steps that had gone down on the steps [of the stairs] of A′haz by the sun retrace backward ten steps.’ And the sun gradually went back ten steps on the steps [of the stairs] that it had gone down.'
translations can be murcky, What happened here, simply a sign was given to Ahaz by God. The sign appears to be the reversing of the shadow on the steps.
says nothing about a flat earth a round earth a spherical earth...it simply says the shadow will reverse itself by 10 steps. A miracle by God.
How is this scripture an evidence of a flat earth or of a writer confused about the motion of the planets???

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by shalamabobbi, posted 02-19-2009 7:41 PM shalamabobbi has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 102 of 473 (499730)
02-20-2009 1:55 AM
Reply to: Message 94 by Theodoric
02-19-2009 7:46 PM


Re: The Literal Interpretation is a Flat Earth
give me a primer so I know what parts of this book should be taken literal and which parts should be taken metaphorical. nMust be easy. You and buzz seem to have no problem determining what the distinction is. Once you can do this I am sure all of this misunderstanding will go away.
Thanks. Once I get this lesson maybe your arguments won't seem so random and senseless.
No, its not always easy and there are still pieces of the puzzle that i am trying to figure out. In saying that though, there is a general rule that is the key to bible understanding....
Context.
You have to consider the immediate context of the scripture in question. Without it the scripture can mean anything.
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by Theodoric, posted 02-19-2009 7:46 PM Theodoric has not replied

  
shalamabobbi
Member (Idle past 2867 days)
Posts: 397
Joined: 01-10-2009


Message 103 of 473 (499734)
02-20-2009 2:28 AM
Reply to: Message 100 by Peg
02-20-2009 1:30 AM


Re: The Literal Interpretation is a Flat Earth
You have to consider the immediate context of the scripture in question. Without it the scripture can mean anything.
We seem to be arguing for the same thing then, put the books of the bible into context of the times in which they were written. Stop ascribing knowledge to people who didn't have it.
In Joshua the sun stood still. So the earth by your argument stopped spinning? Allowing this miracle and an extension of it to include oceans, atmosphere, and no sense of deceleration, etc, we come to the moon next which also stopped moving. Of course if the earth is stopped spinning then for the moon to not be moving relative to the earth it is now in free fall.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by Peg, posted 02-20-2009 1:30 AM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 104 by Peg, posted 02-20-2009 2:35 AM shalamabobbi has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 104 of 473 (499735)
02-20-2009 2:35 AM
Reply to: Message 103 by shalamabobbi
02-20-2009 2:28 AM


Re: The Literal Interpretation is a Flat Earth
shalamabobbi writes:
Of course if the earth is stopped spinning then for the moon to not be moving relative to the earth it is now in free fall.
and thats what a miracle is
something that goes contrary to nature...something that would normally be impossible
certainly its impossible for any man to do, but can we say that it is impossible for God to do?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by shalamabobbi, posted 02-20-2009 2:28 AM shalamabobbi has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by shalamabobbi, posted 02-20-2009 2:55 AM Peg has replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 855 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 105 of 473 (499737)
02-20-2009 2:50 AM
Reply to: Message 99 by DrJones*
02-20-2009 1:14 AM


Even More Complex
DrJones writes:
And you'd be wrong as the Earth is not a perfect sphere, but rather is an oblate spheriod, and thus the equator is not a perfect circle.
And even the term oblate spheroid is an approximation. The actual mean gravitational shape of the earth is a Geoid due to harmonics and regional gravitational variations.
Strange that whatever version of the Bible the anti-science crowd takes as being superior to all science forever and ever can't even get the shape of the earth properly described.
Perhaps just like the shape of the earth is very roughly approximate if one uses a lot of gyrations with their apologetics, the words in the Bible are likewise very roughly approximate with a lot of gyrations of apologetics in regard to the actual intent of any purported divinity.
Either that or it's a circle dammit, observation just has to fit in with what the perfect and infallible Bible says just like as in our perfect and infallible disease-ridden, witch-burning, ignorant Dark Ages in Europe.

Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis Bacon
The more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by DrJones*, posted 02-20-2009 1:14 AM DrJones* has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024