I would appreciate it if you could restate what you said above to be more understandable. Thanks.
The peat fossils dates by C14 were frozen not affected by mineralization, contamination, dilution, etc ... right? They all dated no older than 11,500 years. On this we agree. right?
Another poster suggested the last glacier answers why nothing older meaning the last glacier scraped the Siberian bogs of previous vegetation answers why nothing dated older from his old earth point of view.
The problem with this is the last major glacier is it had no moisture over Siberia. Without major amounts of ice it could not of scraped away previous peat bogs thus the present peat bogs suggest only that its an young earth. right? I mean if life has been growing on this earth for millions of years and this glacier was incapable of removing peat bogs before 11,500 years you should have plenty of stuff dating older than 11,500 years: like 17,000 year 15,000 years 19,000 years, 20,000 years instead only young earth biblical time ages is what you see in the natural and the only explanation why you don't see nothing is a glacier that was not capable of scraping away the previous peat bogs. If the earth is 13,000 years old you should see frozen peat not dating older than 11,500 years by C14(if they were sheltered being frozen in a peat bog from contamination). right? This means your in check right? No excuses other than denial. right? Ok can not or will not refute then guess its check mate!
By the way, I have obtained radiocarbon dates older than 11,500 years myself.
But were they frozen wood fossils sheltered from gamma rays, water leaching, mineralization, and other contaminations, etc...
Edited by johnfolton, : No reason given.
Edited by johnfolton, : No reason given.
Edited by johnfolton, : No reason given.