Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,425 Year: 3,682/9,624 Month: 553/974 Week: 166/276 Day: 6/34 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Do you care what happens next?
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8529
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 5.1


Message 46 of 68 (777303)
01-28-2016 7:16 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by Omnivorous
01-28-2016 6:25 PM


Re: You don't have to be a Christian to object to the physical explanation of everything
Tangle writes:
It's pretty obvious that none of this really matters.
Omni writes:
It's not obvious to me. I agree we can live fulfilling lives regardless, but whether or not all this really matters-- in some larger way that we would care about if we knew--is an open question.
To my mind you are both right.
Different strokes for different folks.
For some, knowing the fate of this universe would matter, to a greater or lesser degree, as an intellectual curiosity. Fulfilling, satisfying, that adds perceived value to the quality of their lives. To others, such would matter no more than wondering if there is a specific lizard living under a specific rock in the middle of the Sonoran Desert. An answer adds no value, perceived or otherwise, to their lives.
Tangle wins out in the end, though. 150 million years from now knowing the answer to the universe question or to the lizard question probably won't matter at all to any of the three of us.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Omnivorous, posted 01-28-2016 6:25 PM Omnivorous has not replied

  
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1525 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


(1)
Message 47 of 68 (777339)
01-29-2016 10:01 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by Tangle
01-28-2016 6:15 PM


Re: You don't have to be a Christian to object to the physical explanation of everything
Hi Tangle,
I was once dated a very beautiful and intelligent, audiology grad student vegan.
She had a very light complexion with tiny brown freckles on her nose and cheeks, raven black hair cropped in a page boy. Her eyes were green as emeralds and just as cold. And the body? What a body! She was the kind of girl you'd have on your arm and say to yourself: wow look at me with this beauty.
She looked at me as if I was some hedonistic, ignoramus because I ate meat. She asked me why I ate meat and I said because I liked it, that I enjoyed a good steak, thus confirming her thoughts about me.
But I digress; I asked her if my eating steak was in any way different than her wearing leather shoes. Me attempting to point out her hypocrisy. All the conversation got me was her not finding me worth talking to anymore and me spending that Christmas wishing I would of shut the fuck up. Did I mention she was beautiful? So whats the point in this? Our quality of life is, I would hope, a few rungs above a cows. And if one eats the cow or wears the cow it really doesn't matter to the cow. But damn does it matter.

"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Tangle, posted 01-28-2016 6:15 PM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-29-2016 3:25 PM 1.61803 has replied
 Message 57 by Tangle, posted 01-29-2016 8:37 PM 1.61803 has seen this message but not replied

  
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1525 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 48 of 68 (777340)
01-29-2016 10:17 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by AZPaul3
01-28-2016 6:17 PM


Re: You don't have to be a Christian to object to the physical explanation of everything
Hi AZPaul3,
AZPaul3 writes:
Is that all there is, a dichotomy? Can't I intellectually recognize that this oak tree is composed of star stuff while simultaneously enjoying the aesthetics of its over arching branches?
Yes, absolutely. I do. It is when someone is spouting off nihilist clap trap that "nothing matters, and we are no more important than a amoeba. Usually for the sole purpose of being provocative. You probably run in greater intellectual circles than I.
AZPaul3 writes:
Can I not understand that love is a reaction of specific chemistry and neuronal activity while simultaneously being happy and fulfilled in being bathed in its warmth?
Absolutely, I do.
AZPaul3 writes:
Just because all things are, in fact, the sum of their parts does not preclude recognizing and, more so, appreciating the beauty and wonder of their emergent properties without evoking the absurdity of some supernatural silliness.
Again I agree.
In my opinion after years of EVC discussion on the "supernatural" I have always held that if it happens in the universe then how can it not be natural? Some folks believe that the only worlds that contain God/gods are those that contain creatures that are there to invoke them.
Edited by 1.61803, : added word:"to"

"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by AZPaul3, posted 01-28-2016 6:17 PM AZPaul3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by Percy, posted 01-29-2016 11:03 AM 1.61803 has seen this message but not replied
 Message 51 by AZPaul3, posted 01-29-2016 11:51 AM 1.61803 has not replied
 Message 52 by xongsmith, posted 01-29-2016 1:27 PM 1.61803 has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22480
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.8


(3)
Message 49 of 68 (777343)
01-29-2016 11:03 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by 1.61803
01-29-2016 10:17 AM


Re: You don't have to be a Christian to object to the physical explanation of everything
1.61803 writes:
It is when someone is spouting off nihilist clap trap that "nothing matters, and we are no more important than a amoeba."
How it feels inside for me is that people are important and matter much more than amoebas, it even feels like there is someone out there who cares and who is in control of everything, but when I ask myself what is the objective evidence that my feelings are true I have no answer. It isn't a problem for me that I cannot reconcile the contradiction.
We do know that people don't matter to things like the cosmic dust of interstellar space. People don't even matter to most life from amoebas to hamsters. People only begin to matter to more intelligent life (e.g., dogs tend to care when they lose their owners), and of course people matter to other people. But what evidence is there that anything else cares about us?
Do I care what happens next? Immensely.
But in the last year or so my eagerness and anticipation of the future has been affected by recent world events, adding fears that weren't there before. Though there were hints, the years leading up to World War II provided no indications of the depth and magnitude of the upcoming tragedy. Our present contains even stronger hints of upcoming troubles, and there seem few indications of the world shifting to a more positive course. One very troubling parallel is that as Jews tried to flee the growing Nazi threat doors slammed around the world, the same as today for Middle Eastern refugees.
--Percy
Edited by Percy, : Typo: dust => space.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by 1.61803, posted 01-29-2016 10:17 AM 1.61803 has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by jar, posted 01-29-2016 11:09 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied
 Message 61 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-30-2016 2:36 AM Percy has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(1)
Message 50 of 68 (777344)
01-29-2016 11:09 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by Percy
01-29-2016 11:03 AM


Re: You don't have to be a Christian to object to the physical explanation of everything
Percy writes:
One very troubling parallel is that as Jews tried to flee the growing Nazi threat doors slammed around the world, the same as today for Middle Eastern refugees.
Amen
And that we build a fence on the southern border but not the northern.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Percy, posted 01-29-2016 11:03 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8529
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 5.1


Message 51 of 68 (777346)
01-29-2016 11:51 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by 1.61803
01-29-2016 10:17 AM


Re: You don't have to be a Christian to object to the physical explanation of everything
It is when someone is spouting off nihilist clap trap that "nothing matters, and we are no more important than a amoeba. Usually for the sole purpose of being provocative.
How can you be provoked by this when they are, in fact, correct? And so are you.
Perspective. Frame of reference.
From the perspective of any other galaxy in the universe we are so unimportant and matter so little as to be non-existent. As far as star stuff and chemistry and evolution and life we really are neither more nor less "important" than an amoeba.
To your wife, your two girlfriends and your dog, however, you are a very important and special creature that matters a great deal in their lives. Depending upon how you care to define special we humans are indeed quite special for our intellect, creativity and curiosity over any other life form on this planet.
Yet, by some other definitions of special we don't even make the list.
To me, the ultimate test is in the far future. 150 million years from now, other than a few curious trinkets lying in the ground, our individual lives along with the extinction of our species, will matter next to nothing.
So, yeah, except as made by us individually where it can matter very dearly, none of this really matters at all.
This is why philosophy sucks. I can have my cake and eat it too and while it may seem important at the time it really isn't for shit.
Edited by AZPaul3, : No reason given.
Edited by AZPaul3, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by 1.61803, posted 01-29-2016 10:17 AM 1.61803 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by Faith, posted 01-29-2016 3:13 PM AZPaul3 has replied
 Message 67 by Stile, posted 02-01-2016 9:44 AM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied

  
xongsmith
Member
Posts: 2587
From: massachusetts US
Joined: 01-01-2009
Member Rating: 6.5


Message 52 of 68 (777352)
01-29-2016 1:27 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by 1.61803
01-29-2016 10:17 AM


Re: You don't have to be a Christian to object to the physical explanation of everything
Golden writes:
It is when someone is spouting off nihilist clap trap that "nothing matters, and we are no more important than a amoeba. Usually for the sole purpose of being provocative.
I admit to being amused by 1.6180339's sig line in context with that:
"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs
Cheerio, then!! On beyond Zebra!
Dig it.

- xongsmith, 5.7d

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by 1.61803, posted 01-29-2016 10:17 AM 1.61803 has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 53 of 68 (777360)
01-29-2016 3:13 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by AZPaul3
01-29-2016 11:51 AM


Re: You don't have to be a Christian to object to the physical explanation of everything
To your wife, your two girlfriends and your dog, however, you are a very important and special creature that matters a great deal in their lives. Depending upon how you care to define special we humans are indeed quite special for our intellect, creativity and curiosity over any other life form on this planet.
When I brought up the subject of human specialness I had something objective in mind, something completely independent of whether there is anyone including our dog and cat who cares about us personally, and it seems important to distinguish the two ways we are important. Yes, our objective capacities, intellect etc, OK but even those sometimes get reduced to physicalities by the science-minded.
From the perspective of any other galaxy in the universe we are so unimportant and matter so little as to be non-existent. As far as star stuff and chemistry and evolution and life we really are neither more nor less "important" than an amoeba.
But what kind of "perspective" is that since there is no consciousness in any of that? This is the very mentality I was objecting to. We can't be meaningfully compared to the mindless cold vastness of the universe at all and the compulsion to make that comparison is nonsensical. Of course it's all justified by the theory of evolution in the end I guess. If you believe that as the explanation of it all you make a logical leap that deprives humanity of specialness that has nothing to do with our actual qualities. Even believing in evolution, though, it seems to me that all you have to do is look at those human qualities by comparison with all the rest of it to assess our specialness. You don't have to let evolution dictate anything about our value.
But to keep the thread's topic in mind, I absolutely cannot care about the fate of the physical universe apart from Us, or apart from any living thing for that matter, but especially Us. You don't have to believe in God to see that we have a nature that puts us as far above the amoeba as the amoeba is above an atom, actually we're that far above the ape too, all that similarity of DNA notwithstanding, since the physical body is not the point. Believing in God makes it possible to explain it though, which the physical sciences can never do.
Yet, by some other definitions of special we don't even make the list.
That nonsensical list again. You are subordinating us to mere physical hugeness with your comparison to other galaxies.
To me, the ultimate test is in the far future. 150 million years from now, other than a few curious trinkets lying in the ground, our individual lives along with the extinction of our species, will matter next to nothing.
Yeah, this is the scientistic reductionist thinking I was talking about.
For some reason Dylan Thomas' lines keep coming to mind: "Do not go gentle into that good night; rage rage against the dying of the light." Anyone who can think like that is far more important than any hundreds of millions of years, or a billion galaxies and the whole lineage of evolution that supposedly preceded us.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by AZPaul3, posted 01-29-2016 11:51 AM AZPaul3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by AZPaul3, posted 01-29-2016 5:49 PM Faith has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 306 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 54 of 68 (777362)
01-29-2016 3:25 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by 1.61803
01-29-2016 10:01 AM


Re: You don't have to be a Christian to object to the physical explanation of everything
But I digress; I asked her if my eating steak was in any way different than her wearing leather shoes.
Obviously. Because leather is a by-product of killing cows for meat. No-one kills cows for the leather, and eats beef as a by-product. She was right, and you should have considered becoming a vegan if only for her emerald-green eyes, rather than breaking up with her 'cos of her imaginary hypocrisy. I'm sorry to say this, but you should have shut the fuck up.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by 1.61803, posted 01-29-2016 10:01 AM 1.61803 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by xongsmith, posted 01-29-2016 4:45 PM Dr Adequate has not replied
 Message 68 by 1.61803, posted 02-01-2016 11:24 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
xongsmith
Member
Posts: 2587
From: massachusetts US
Joined: 01-01-2009
Member Rating: 6.5


Message 55 of 68 (777363)
01-29-2016 4:45 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by Dr Adequate
01-29-2016 3:25 PM


Re: You don't have to be a Christian to object to the physical explanation of everything
The Docter posits:
Because leather is a by-product of killing cows for meat. No-one kills cows for the leather, and eats beef as a by-product.
Maybe so - but the Buffalo? Remember that scene in Dances With Wolves?

- xongsmith, 5.7d

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-29-2016 3:25 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by Omnivorous, posted 01-30-2016 5:45 PM xongsmith has not replied

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8529
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 5.1


Message 56 of 68 (777365)
01-29-2016 5:49 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by Faith
01-29-2016 3:13 PM


Re: You don't have to be a Christian to object to the physical explanation of everything
Yes, our objective capacities, intellect etc, OK but even those sometimes get reduced to physicalities by the science-minded.
Is there some type of problem understanding the physical dimensions of intellect? Does that understanding somehow reduce its usefulness and function?
Knowing that your potato naturally contains 4-O-caffeoylquinic acid (crypto-chlorogenic acid), 5-O-caffeoylquinic (neo-chlorogenic acid), 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic and 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acids, does this somehow detract from your enjoyment of its taste when baked with a little olive oil and salt?
But what kind of "perspective" is that since there is no consciousness in any of that? This is the very mentality I was objecting to. We can't be meaningfully compared to the mindless cold vastness of the universe at all...
No other consciousness in the universe? Pshaw! The numbers are too big and the chemistry too active for there not to be. But that's off-topic.
What is on-topic is that fact that we are as unimportant to them as they presently are to us. As far as "mattering" to our lives they are as non-existent to us as we are to them.
Plus the fact that we and the amoeba and the rock on the side of the road are all products of this vast mindless cold universe and that makes the comparisons compelling not nonsensical. And that compelling comparison is that we are all come to be from the same materials from the same sources by the same physics.
The only importance to be given among the three is the subjective value we ourselves assign.
Believing in God makes it possible to explain it though, which the physical sciences can never do.
Your fairy tale is just an excuse to assign subjective values making you feel superior to all the rest of the stuff around you in this vast cold mindless universe that really doesn't give a damn what we think.
I absolutely cannot care about the fate of the physical universe apart from Us, or apart from any living thing for that matter, but especially Us.
That is just fine. That answers Omnivorous' question. And yours is as valid an answer as any.
I, as I stated, don't so much care to any great extent other than having the intellectual satisfaction of knowing. That would be good.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Faith, posted 01-29-2016 3:13 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by Faith, posted 01-29-2016 9:10 PM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied
 Message 59 by Faith, posted 01-29-2016 9:14 PM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9504
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 57 of 68 (777369)
01-29-2016 8:37 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by 1.61803
01-29-2016 10:01 AM


Re: You don't have to be a Christian to object to the physical explanation of everything
1.6 etc writes:
Hi Tangle,
I was once dated a very beautiful and intelligent, audiology grad student vegan.[...] But I digress;
Yes but it seemed rude to interupt.
So whats the point in this?
Having the winning arguments doesn't necessarily get you laid?
Our quality of life is, I would hope, a few rungs above a cows.
What if the cow gets laid regularly?
And if one eats the cow or wears the cow it really doesn't matter to the cow. But damn does it matter.
Does it? Did you care before you were born and do people care after they die? Whilst we're alive it's important how we live, but in the great scheme of things, it's utterly irrelevant. It's best in life to have no sense of perspective, therein lies happiness. Just like a cow.
Consciousness has big downsides.

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien.
Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android
"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by 1.61803, posted 01-29-2016 10:01 AM 1.61803 has seen this message but not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 58 of 68 (777370)
01-29-2016 9:10 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by AZPaul3
01-29-2016 5:49 PM


Re: You don't have to be a Christian to object to the physical explanation of everything
dup
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by AZPaul3, posted 01-29-2016 5:49 PM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 59 of 68 (777371)
01-29-2016 9:14 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by AZPaul3
01-29-2016 5:49 PM


Re: You don't have to be a Christian to object to the physical explanation of everything
Is there some type of problem understanding the physical dimensions of intellect? Does that understanding somehow reduce its usefulness and function?
It trivializes it, and it can indeed work to undermine its functions by depriving it of a proper respect. That's what I've been objecting to -- and really I think it has this effect on everybody even if you don't recognize it -- physicalizing the things of the mind or consciousness etc. does devalue it. Omni's cute little phrase "scantily furred mammal" is the same sort of reductionism. Even its cuteness implies the reductionism in it.
Knowing that your potato naturally contains 4-O-caffeoylquinic acid (crypto-chlorogenic acid), 5-O-caffeoylquinic (neo-chlorogenic acid), 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic and 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acids, does this somehow detract from your enjoyment of its taste when baked with a little olive oil and salt?
No, because a potato is a physical thing.
No other consciousness in the universe? Pshaw! The numbers are too big and the chemistry too active for there not to be. But that's off-topic.
What is on-topic is that fact that we are as unimportant to them as they presently are to us. As far as "mattering" to our lives they are as non-existent to us as we are to them.
Looks to me like we're not going to find any other life in the universe, but that aside, I'm talking about intrinsic value as I said, and who or what we "matter" to -- doesn't matter, has no place in the objective evaluation I'm talking about.
Plus the fact that we and the amoeba and the rock on the side of the road are all products of this vast mindless cold universe and that makes the comparisons compelling not nonsensical. And that compelling comparison is that we are all come to be from the same materials from the same sources by the same physics.
I guess you don't think much of my argument that the value can be assessed by considering its qualities, and that the objective evaluation I'm talking about is completely independent of the physical nature of the physical parts of us which we share with others. We are more than our physicality, a LOT more. The human being is OBVIOUSLY as superior to the ape as the ape is to the amoeba if you just compare all the qualities that are pertinent.
The only importance to be given among the three is the subjective value we ourselves assign.
If our subjective evaluation is based on physical reductionism we don't get anywhere near a fair assessment. Objectively, however, leads to what I say above, as superior to the ape as the ape is to the amoeba.
Physical reductionism trivializes life, and it trivializes it in the mind that indulges the idea.
Believing in God makes it possible to explain it though, which the physical sciences can never do.
Your fairy tale is just an excuse to assign subjective values making you feel superior to all the rest of the stuff around you in this vast cold mindless universe that really doesn't give a damn what we think.
As I said, believing in God, by which I mean of course the Christian or Biblical God, makes it possible to explain it all -- objectively and with a proper valuation. The values we derive from it aren't subjective because they were written down 2000 to 3500 years ago -- and again, it matters not a bit that the universe cares not - we're a billion times more important than the physical universe.
I absolutely cannot care about the fate of the physical universe apart from Us, or apart from any living thing for that matter, but especially Us.
That is just fine. That answers Omnivorous' question. And yours is as valid an answer as any.
I should have said I don't think anybody else does either, not REALLY. You reduce the value of humanity with your physicalizing and that means you have to devalue humanity in your own mind too. However, if you value anything at all it has to be humanity or living things, we just aren't made to care about a vast cold universe. Impressed, dazzled, awed perhaps, but care about it, love it? Don't think so. Everybody is just pretending to care, it's not in your nature to care. And you go on to say that:
I, as I stated, don't so much care to any great extent other than having the intellectual satisfaction of knowing. That would be good.
I do think you will know some day.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by AZPaul3, posted 01-29-2016 5:49 PM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by jar, posted 01-29-2016 10:33 PM Faith has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 60 of 68 (777378)
01-29-2016 10:33 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Faith
01-29-2016 9:14 PM


Re: You don't have to be a Christian to object to the physical explanation of everything
There are some things we can know with a very high degree of confidence; for example we can say that the descriptions of how this universe will end found in the bible are every bit as silly, absurd and incorrect as the descriptions found in the bible of how this universe began.
Honestly, there really is no other tool than science if we want to get any idea of how this universe began or how this universe will end.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Faith, posted 01-29-2016 9:14 PM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024