PROOF OF GOD

No. Simply ignoring the points I raised is not an adequate answer.You HAVE been shown why the evidence did not support you, in post 32.Trying to pretend otherwise without answering my points reveals that you have no case.

Willow:Hey, dude, forget about all this earthbound haggling ...Tune in to what's up on MARS > http://www.mt.net/~watcher/pyramid.html

Please show me where I have ignored your points. Do not insult my intelligence. The truth is you do not like my answers.

Post 32 and your replies.But then you know that.

How does post 35 fail to answer post 32 ?

May I make a suggestion?How about you take this topic to Great Debates.I would suggest a limit on the number of posts, say five posts for each side. You can present evidence for your theory, unrefuted, while someone else will present evidence for the pyramids being built by Egyptians. After each side presents their five posts, or rests their case should less than five posts be needed, the admins can issue a statement as to which argument is most convincing.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

It addresses none of the comments on Isaiah.It does not offer any objective grounds for setting the length of the Pyramid inch or the start or end points. Without such grounds they are arbitrary and no amount of denial will change that.

I don't see much point. It would make more sense to point out to the admins that Willowtree is violating forum guidelines by refusing to support his assertions.

Which is nothing new. Remember his Martyr thread? It took weeks of quote mining and "Dr. Scott says.." and not one iota of true evidence to back the claims.

I have posted my claims and the source - this is a fact.In response, you have posted your opinions and no source to cite except yourself.You are a person who has never studied my claims for even 10 hours prior to this topic. If you were me in an evolution topic I would be laughed off the board.You are now sniveling for an Admin intrusion, a person who shares your worldview, to validate your unsupported assertions and opinions.I could easily cut and paste your ignorant and unsupported opinions and then cut and paste my claims with sources attached but to do this would cave into your dishonesty.This message has been edited by WILLOWTREE, 06-18-2004 01:45 PM

I agree.

Darwin's leading supporter, Thomas Huxley, quote:"No rational man, cognizant of the facts, believes that the Negro is the equal, still less superior, of the white man."From "The Descent of Man" by Charles Darwin, quote:"at some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace the savage races throughout the world."Lies about Dr. Scott deserve a response of truth concerning the creators of Darwinist theory.

Are you saying Dr. Scott is ineligible to be cited and quoted as a source ?

if you wish to be greeted by laughter.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Saying Dr. Scott is laughable is only said because you know the exact opposite is true.A Ph.D. from Stanford burns unquenchable anger in you, and the fact that you must attack him personally shows you are bankrupt on sources to refute anything he teaches.Dr. Scott has his evidence to be accessed by anyone on his website.All honest and intelligent people know the last refuge of the defeated is to create lies about the messenger because they have no answer to the message/evidence.Howling and excrement flinging Darwinists do this to super smart people who threaten their dogma.