Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   the big bang ( Questions from a Teen )
redwolf
Member (Idle past 5791 days)
Posts: 185
From: alexandria va usa
Joined: 04-13-2004


Message 76 of 79 (100378)
04-16-2004 11:06 AM
Reply to: Message 74 by coffee_addict
04-16-2004 5:41 AM


>You've never really seen a legitimate physicist or astronomer talking about the big bang theory have you?
In fact I have. In all cases they were describing it as a bunch of BS.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by coffee_addict, posted 04-16-2004 5:41 AM coffee_addict has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by JonF, posted 04-16-2004 6:26 PM redwolf has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 735 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 77 of 79 (100383)
04-16-2004 11:29 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by redwolf
04-16-2004 11:01 AM


but also with the curvature of a reconstructed Pangaea, which is not the same as the Earth's present curvature.
Uh.....right...
I look forward to your book explaining this.

El sueo de la razn produce monstruos. - Francisco Goya

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by redwolf, posted 04-16-2004 11:01 AM redwolf has not replied

  
Sylas
Member (Idle past 5260 days)
Posts: 766
From: Newcastle, Australia
Joined: 11-17-2002


Message 78 of 79 (100390)
04-16-2004 1:14 PM
Reply to: Message 75 by redwolf
04-16-2004 11:01 AM


redwolf writes:
Do me a favor. I'm about a month or two away from having a book on the topic of D&G available for downloading; wait until that is there before starting such a topic.
To my thinking, the controversy is no longer who, between Holden, Kronia, Talbott et. al. or Throop, t.o., Ellenberger et. al. is correct, but rather whether or not you can come up with any reason to believe in an "expanding Earth" theory.
The new thread is already submitted, before I saw this request. It is up at Message 1.
Since you have already posted your link the TV program, there is no reason not to explain the background. That background has nothing to do with expanding earth, so rest easy.
I was posting on the subject of dinosaurs and gravity, and the nature of the argument for a reduced felt effect of gravity; which is the dominant theme in the provided link.
I am sure folks would love to hear about your forthcoming book when it gets published. Don't be a stranger; I look forward to another thread on that subject when it comes out. In the meantime, the link you have already provided is the main subject of the new thread; and expanding earth is not even considered.
Cheers -- Sylas
[This message has been edited by Sylas, 04-16-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by redwolf, posted 04-16-2004 11:01 AM redwolf has not replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 168 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 79 of 79 (100454)
04-16-2004 6:26 PM
Reply to: Message 76 by redwolf
04-16-2004 11:06 AM


You've never really seen a legitimate physicist or astronomer talking about the big bang theory have you?
In fact I have. In all cases they were describing it as a bunch of BS.
Indeed? Names, please?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by redwolf, posted 04-16-2004 11:06 AM redwolf has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024