Well, it has to do indirectly with science, because there have been so called scientific claims that there was no star of Bethlehem in reality. Those claims are not supported if this was a star in the ancient sense of the word, which, basically meant about any light, or planet in the sky.
Therefore it can't be claimed that the star of the bible is scientifically inaccurate at all. Or errant.
The source for God flying in a mobile throne is the bible. Not a theory. The application of that known fact of the bible to the birth of His son, can be connected by old testament prophesy. The sceptre was not to depart until after Shiloh, or Jesus was born.
So we have the Suspect's vehicle make, and material. We have the birth of His son at a given location, and a mysterious light in the sky documented. What Father would not be close at hand forsomething like that? We also have angels singing in the heavens, another fingerprint of the mobile throne of God. (to the shepherds by night)
We also have it disappearing from the scene after Shiloh had come. In fact, the last act of this 'star' was to actively guide the wise men to the very house of the young Jesus, with gold, and precious gifts!
That establishes also it was not a star in the present day sense of the word.
There is more.
The star has to be something other than a star in the modern sense, because we know, by science, and records of the earth of the time, that there was no star there in the sky. It could not have been that kind of star.
That was one reason why I thought of the bible accuracy area. It can stand up to any science!
™ Version 4.2
