|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Should we teach both evolution and religion in school? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 432 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
creation writes:
No, creationISM is a contempt for science - which you have admitted to having - and the attempt to prove that science is wrong. It has always failed to do so. Creationism is the belief in God creating everything. You should not confuse some historical attempts at explaining how the evidences fit with a creation, with creation itself. The belief in a creator is not creationISM unless it sets itself in opposition to science.
creation writes:
Your approach on this forum has been to parrot Points Refuted A Thousand Times. You have never made an attempt to seriously discuss how stupid those points are. I have suggested to you several times that you should pick one topic and discuss it. This running around from topic to topic and blathering nonsense isn't impressing amybody - except maybe your teachers. My approach has been more one of looking at the real premises and fundamental core beliefs that are used in origin sciences.And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
The distance to SN1987A was measured by trigonometry, not parallax.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4409 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.4
|
Your approach on this forum has been to parrot Points Refuted A Thousand Times. You have never made an attempt to seriously discuss how stupid those points are. I have suggested to you several times that you should pick one topic and discuss it. This running around from topic to topic and blathering nonsense isn't impressing anybody - except maybe your teachers. He is just a troll. When you try to read his nonsense it's pretty convincing evidence that he has never had a teacher who was qualified to teach.What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
That's an unwarranted slur against teachers. I doubt the best teacher in the world could teach him anything. He knows it all already. Tres Trumpian.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4409 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.4 |
That's an unwarranted slur against teachers. I doubt the best teacher in the world could teach him anything. Oh, I agree. I meant that he writes and thinks as if he never had a teacher. Dunning—Kruger effect.What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 1963 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
Using a base line from this solar system consisting of millions of miles of space...and time.
Using trig to make the line to the star equal with the base line is using belief that there is time and space at all points that are the same. That is religion with a trig dress on.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 1963 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
You have not even really addressed the issues let alone offered anything to refute.
You offer religion and beliefs and attitude. Creation believers have the right and duty to question whacked out worldly wise men making weird and baseless anti creation claims.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 432 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
creation writes:
That's what I'm telling you. Pick an issue. Address that issue. Read the responses. Reply to the responses.
You have not even really addressed the issues let alone offered anything to refute. creation writes:
But they don't have the ability. You can't question something intelligently if you don't understand it - and you clearly don't understand page one of your elementary school science book. Creation believers have the right and duty to question whacked out worldly wise men making weird and baseless anti creation claims. Your complaints are very shallow. Dig deeper.And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Using a base line from this solar system consisting of millions of miles of space...and time.
Bzzzzzt! Wrong. Thanks for playing, and here's a copy of the home game for you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 1963 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
I am right you are wrong. Feel free to demonstrate how parallax trig does not use a base line from the solar system. Ha.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 1963 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
Empty blather aside, feel free to post some point that you can actually support and discuss. This is not a thread about trying to sound tuff.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 432 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
creation writes:
You're the one who claims that science is wrong. You pick a topic and refute it. Empty blather aside, feel free to post some point that you can actually support and discuss.And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined:
|
The distance to SN1987A was not measured by parallax. As I noted. The baseline was the distance from the supernova to the surrounding ring of debris. Feel free to Google up some of the clear explanations.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 1963 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
Look it up...a parallax measure has a base line. If you claim otherwise, do more than buzz around.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
The distance to SN1987A was not measured by parallax. Do try to keep up.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024