Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Did Jesus lie ?
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 300 (353873)
10-03-2006 11:31 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by Brian
10-03-2006 11:21 AM


But, if people are going to read the Bible with the preconcieved notion that jesus wasn't a liar then they are not going to be able to see the lies He told.
I lost my faith for some time. I reread a lot of the new testament with no preconceived notions and I honestly believe Jesus.
I think you read the Bible with the preconceived notion that we was a liar.
I also think its possible for people to read the Bible without preconceived notions and see that what Jesus said was truth and that he did not lie.
OFF TOPIC - Please do not respond to this message or continue in this vein.
Thank you --AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Off Topic Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Brian, posted 10-03-2006 11:21 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Brian, posted 10-03-2006 11:37 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 17 of 300 (353875)
10-03-2006 11:33 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by New Cat's Eye
10-03-2006 11:28 AM


Re: Pants on fire
Interesting.
I would have thought you would say He was speaking of the Ascension when He talked of coming into His kingdom in which case there is no conflict at all with what he said.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-03-2006 11:28 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-03-2006 12:09 PM jar has not replied
 Message 23 by Brian, posted 10-03-2006 1:23 PM jar has not replied
 Message 25 by Legend, posted 10-03-2006 3:28 PM jar has not replied

Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 18 of 300 (353876)
10-03-2006 11:35 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by New Cat's Eye
10-03-2006 11:28 AM


Re: Pants on fire
Maybe he was being misleading on purpose so they thought he was claiming something more immediate so they would assign more weight to the claim. We're getting closer to lying here but still not there.
Eh? There are varying degrees of lies?
Maybe he was just far out, man.
Good chance of it.
Maybe he was being honest and deep, without trying to be misleading, and the people really didn't have a clue what he was on about.
You would think He would have addressed His audience in a way that they would understand, after all isn't that what the parables do?
Spiritual death.
Which means exactly what to a first century Jew?
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-03-2006 11:28 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 19 of 300 (353878)
10-03-2006 11:37 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by New Cat's Eye
10-03-2006 11:31 AM


lost my faith for some time. I reread a lot of the new testament with no preconceived notions and I honestly believe Jesus.
I don't think that is possible.
I think you read the Bible with the preconceived notion that we was a liar.
not at all. I really couldn't care less about what Jesus said. I read the words, then look at the evidence, and it all points to porky pies.
I also think its possible for people to read the Bible without preconceived notions and see that what Jesus said was truth and that he did not lie.
Only if they do not have a critical mind.
Brian.
OFF TOPIC - Please do not respond to this message or continue in this vein.
Thank you --AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Off Topic Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-03-2006 11:31 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3627 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 20 of 300 (353879)
10-03-2006 11:40 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Brian
10-03-2006 9:50 AM


Options
Two possibilities other than lying look realistic:
1. Jesus meant what he said. He was just mistaken.
2. Jesus didn't say it. The writer did.
Neither option will appeal much to a devout inerrantist. There remains the possibility of rationalizing the statement through other means:
3. Some people really didn't die.
4. The kingdom came.
Either may be combined with this one:
5. He was speaking metaphorically.
My money would be on Option #2. This brand of eschatology flourished in the decades immediately after the fall of Jerusalem in 70 ACE. That corresponds to the time most of the NT documents were penned.
_
Edited by Archer Opterix, : Brevity.
Edited by Archer Opterix, : Brevity.

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Brian, posted 10-03-2006 9:50 AM Brian has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by Legend, posted 10-03-2006 3:37 PM Archer Opteryx has not replied

Legend
Member (Idle past 5036 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 21 of 300 (353890)
10-03-2006 12:00 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by New Cat's Eye
10-03-2006 11:28 AM


'spiritual death'
quote:
What do you think Jesus meant?
Catholic Scientist writes:
Spiritual death.
what exactly do you mean by 'spiritual death' ?
and what makes you think that's what he meant ?

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-03-2006 11:28 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 22 of 300 (353895)
10-03-2006 12:09 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by jar
10-03-2006 11:33 AM


Re: Pants on fire
quote:
Mt 16:28 I tell you the truth, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom."
I would have thought you would say He was speaking of the Ascension when He talked of coming into His kingdom in which case there is no conflict at all with what he said.
Sounds good.
I don't even know what I'm typing about anymore. Me and Brian were typing about death. I should think before I type. Actually, I should probably just get back to work and stop slacking on the internet. Especially if I'm posting complete bullshit.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by jar, posted 10-03-2006 11:33 AM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Brian, posted 10-03-2006 1:24 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 23 of 300 (353912)
10-03-2006 1:23 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by jar
10-03-2006 11:33 AM


Re: Pants on fire
I would have thought you would say He was speaking of the Ascension when He talked of coming into His kingdom in which case there is no conflict at all with what he said.
I don't think that Jesus meant that He would return that early. Depending on which contradictory account you take as Gospel, I dont think the majority of Jesus audience would have died before the Ascension.
I suppose for this scenario you should go with the Acts 1:9-12 version as it gives you about 6 weeks more time than the Luke 24:50-51 version which has Jesus acsending on the same day as the resurrection.
But I think the ascension was too soon to be what Jesus was on about here. There are more problems with this scenario as well, but I am off out, big pool match tonight and I need to get a few frames under my belt.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by jar, posted 10-03-2006 11:33 AM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 194 by 8upwidit2, posted 10-20-2006 9:20 AM Brian has replied

Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 24 of 300 (353913)
10-03-2006 1:24 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by New Cat's Eye
10-03-2006 12:09 PM


Re: Pants on fire
Especially if I'm posting complete bullshit.
Don't worry about it, Popes have been doing it for more than 16 centuries.
Brian.
OFF TOPIC - Please do not respond to this message or continue in this vein.
Thank you --AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-03-2006 12:09 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Legend
Member (Idle past 5036 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 25 of 300 (353939)
10-03-2006 3:28 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by jar
10-03-2006 11:33 AM


Kingdom of God
jar writes:
I would have thought you would say He was speaking of the Ascension when He talked of coming into His kingdom in which case there is no conflict at all with what he said.
This has nothing to do with Jesus ascending into his kingdom but is an eschatological verse. Jesus predicting the coming of the kingdom of God.
The preceding verse (16:27) says as much:
quote:
For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works.
Also, the parallel passage in Luke makes it clear:
"...there be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the kingdom of God. (Luke 9:27)"
Jesus, once again, expects to physically be with his disciples after his kingdom is established. It explains why he was so disappointed when, on the cross, he realised it was not going to happen! (Matt 27:46)

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by jar, posted 10-03-2006 11:33 AM jar has not replied

Legend
Member (Idle past 5036 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 26 of 300 (353940)
10-03-2006 3:37 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Archer Opteryx
10-03-2006 11:40 AM


Re: Options
Two other realistic possibilities exist:
1. Jesus meant what he said. He was just mistaken.
2. Jesus didn't say it. The writer did.
I think it was no 1.
In the synoptic gospels he doesn't come across as a liar but as a passionate, caring preacher who believed in what he said. As it happened, he was wrong. Hey, he was only human after all so who can blame him?
My money, if anyone is wondering, would be on Realistic Option #2. This brand of eschatology flourished in the decades immediately after the fall of Jerusalem in 70 AD--the period in which most of the NT documents were written.
Paul's letters contain significant eschatological references and they were written much earlier than 70 AD which lends more credence to my hypothesis that Jesus really did say and expect the kingdom of God to be established during this generation.

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Archer Opteryx, posted 10-03-2006 11:40 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 27 of 300 (354094)
10-04-2006 8:36 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Brian
10-03-2006 9:50 AM


Re: Pants on fire
RR's excuse is a good example of how the Christian apologist's mind works.
His retort 'they are not dead' doesn't really address the issue at all. The text says that 'some' of the people will not have tasted death, which implies that some will have tasted death, so 'they are not dead' doesn't mean anything.
John 3:16
16 "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
Clearly some perish, and some continue living. Basic stuff here, no apologetics, and no contortionist, just plain truth. If you think I am apologizing for you not understanding the bible, and taking even a step beyond to down right insulting droves of people, your out of your mind. You should be smart enough to piece this together, and know what Jesus taught us is truth.
You've even start to admit it yourself, when we started discussing about lying. It's all in you Brian, you just have to tap into it. Every excuse you make does not justify away what is truth, and then you take the responsibility of trying to convince others of your dellusions.
Psalm 90:10
The length of our days is seventy years, or eighty, if we have the strength; yet their span is but trouble and sorrow, for they quickly pass, and we fly away.
Genesis 6:3
Then the LORD said, "My Spirit will not contend with man forever, for he is mortal ; his days will be a hundred and twenty years."
Matthew 10:23
When you are persecuted in one place, flee to another. I tell you the truth, you will not finish going through the cities of Israel before the Son of Man comes.
Now, Israel did not have that many cities, so the return must have been expected very soon.
We are still not finished going through those cities.
Another way of looking at it is that we are the new Jerusalem, so the cities/people are endless.
However that verse would seem to contradict this verse:
quote:
Matthew 24:14
And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.
So one one hand He is saying the gospel will not be preached before the end, and the other hand He says it will. So obviously we don't understand what He meant. This does not make Him a liar. Your evidence of Him being a liar is not beyond a shadow of a doubt. You have to take the whole bible into consideration when making these accusations.
The NIV study bible explains that 10:23 verse as this:
Jesus' saying here is probably best understood as referring to his coming in judgement on the Jews when Jerusalem and the temple were destroyed in A.D.70.
Just because we don't understand what He meant by what He said does not make Him a liar.
You are acting a literalist. You are more concerned with the actual words of the bible, instead of the word of God, and having the Holy Spirit speak to your heart, and let you know what is meant.
Incidently, we are still waiting for Jesus 'Walter Mitty' Christ to turn up.
This is a problem?
Only to those people who preach rapture BS.
I will live my life like He is coming tomorrow, and 1000 years from now. My only concern is the next generation after me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Brian, posted 10-03-2006 9:50 AM Brian has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by Legend, posted 10-04-2006 4:24 PM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 30 by Asgara, posted 10-04-2006 5:41 PM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 28 of 300 (354096)
10-04-2006 8:40 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by New Cat's Eye
10-03-2006 11:00 AM


Re: Pants on fire
Well put.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-03-2006 11:00 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Legend
Member (Idle past 5036 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 29 of 300 (354232)
10-04-2006 4:24 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by riVeRraT
10-04-2006 8:36 AM


spiritual death ?
quote:
Mt 16:28 I tell you the truth, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom."
quote:
John 3:16 "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
riVeRrat writes:
Clearly some perish, and some continue living. Basic stuff here, no apologetics, and no contortionist, just plain truth. If you think I am apologizing for you not understanding the bible, and taking even a step beyond to down right insulting droves of people, your out of your mind. You should be smart enough to piece this together, and know what Jesus taught us is truth.
Given the unfamiliarity of Jesus and the disciples with Johannine theology what makes you think that they would have understood him talking about a spiritual death rather then a physical one ?

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by riVeRraT, posted 10-04-2006 8:36 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by riVeRraT, posted 10-04-2006 8:59 PM Legend has replied

Asgara
Member (Idle past 2332 days)
Posts: 1783
From: Wisconsin, USA
Joined: 05-10-2003


Message 30 of 300 (354252)
10-04-2006 5:41 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by riVeRraT
10-04-2006 8:36 AM


Re: Pants on fire
I was under the impression that everyone was blessed/cursed with eternal life...it is just the destination that is in contention.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by riVeRraT, posted 10-04-2006 8:36 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by riVeRraT, posted 10-04-2006 9:01 PM Asgara has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024