|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,415 Year: 3,672/9,624 Month: 543/974 Week: 156/276 Day: 30/23 Hour: 3/3 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Poll; theist, atheist or agnostic | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Chiroptera Inactive Member |
Actually, they can. A good chunk of those theists are evolutionists.
"These monkeys are at once the ugliest and the most beautiful creatures on the planet./ And the monkeys don't want to be monkeys; they want to be something else./ But they're not." -- Ernie Cline
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1465 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Most theists think that a Creator set it all in motion, don't they? That would be interesting broken down further anyway.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
mick Member (Idle past 5007 days) Posts: 913 Joined: |
i vote atheist
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
A good chunk of those theists are evolutionists Yeah, I'm wondering how they reconcile it. But that is for another thread. "Your friends, if they can, may bury you with some distinction, and set up a monument, to let posterity see that your dust lies under such a stone; and when that is done, all is done. Your place is filled up by another, the world is just in the same state it was, you are blotted out of its sight, and as much forgotten by the world as if you had never belonged to it."--William Law
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hyroglyphx Inactive Member |
One thing the list proves is that creos can`t say they are heavily outnumbered at EVC. At least at this point in time. That's not true at all. This list has nothing to do with the creation/evolution debate. As you can see, the Theist list contains many prominent theistic evolutionists. And of those that voted as Theists, there are only a handful who are Christian and creationists. There are very few here. “If chance be the father of all flesh then disaster is his rainbow in the sky. And when you hear of, state of emergencies, sniper kills ten, youths go looting, bomb blasts school, it is but the sound of man worshipping his maker” -Steve Turner
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hyroglyphx Inactive Member |
THEIST
1. Nemesis Juggernaut 2. Faith 3. Mjfloresta 4. Catholic Scientist 5. Percy 6. Iano 7. Arachnophilia 8. Buzsaw 9. Phat 10. Jazzns 11. Trixie 12. Tal 13. GDR 14. Anglagard 15. Purpledawn AGNOSTIC1. Creavolution 2. Omnivorous 3. Schrafinator 4. MangyTiger 5. Rail Bird 6. Rick JB 7. Inflixion 8. Tusko 9. Ekman 10. ReverendDG ATHEIST1. Robinrohan 2. Ramoss 3. Subbie 4. Annafan 5. Chronos 6. Corpagyps 7. Randy Feagley 8. Crashfrog 9. Mutty6969 10. CK 11. Chiroptera 12. Michael 13. Nighttrain 14. NosyNed 15. Jaderis 16. Parasomnium 17. Quetzal 18. NeuroCycle 19. Mick NONE OF OUR BUISNESS1. DrJones RINGO-- IN A CLASS BY HIMSELF1. RINGO (there can only be one Ringo to rule them all)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
anglagard Member (Idle past 857 days) Posts: 2339 From: Socorro, New Mexico USA Joined: |
The poll is limited to the simple question "do you believe in God or possibly in gods?"
There are four ultimately discrete answers: 1. No2. Undecided 3. Yes 4. No comment All responses have reasons behind them, some of which are easily, if not completely, traced in this forum.
quote: As to your second point, while there may be reasons why one does or does not believe in God, once belief is presumed, there are many ways how one believes in God. There is pretty much only one way how one does not believe in, or is undecided, about belief in God. The 'how' of belief automatically becomes irrelevant. The 'how' of belief, as it is personal and not subject to scientific proof, to paraphrase Einstein, becomes as diverse as the personal characteristics of the beliver, provided one does not become overly enraptured by other personalities, be they living or presume to speak from a position of absolute and unquestioning authority for their interpretation of past events. Therefore it should be no surprise there is a tremendous variety among self-described theists. Yes, it would be interesting, as IMHO there are many ways to God, to each according to our understanding. As to your first point, not all belief systems assume a completely linear relationship between creator and created, however I have digressed enough. Perhaps the best place to elaborate upon one's 'how' is through the thread of the personal belief statement rather than a poll with a limited number of discrete outcomes. Edited by anglagard, : forgot backslash in quote
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
there are many ways how one believes in God. I beg your pardon? "Ways" and "how" don't exactly go together.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
anglagard Member (Idle past 857 days) Posts: 2339 From: Socorro, New Mexico USA Joined: |
I beg your pardon? "Ways" and "how" don't exactly go together. Intended to mean, although not exclusively meaning, there is a difference between the Western "Judeo-Christian-Islamic" concept of God and that of many other societies. The "way" means "different" the how means "in both philosophic belief and in practice." Admittedly, it may not be proper English. Sorry for the breakdown in communication.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Minnemooseus Member Posts: 3945 From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior) Joined: Member Rating: 10.0 |
Agnostic, defaulting to atheist.
Having no reason to be a theist, I default to atheist. I suspect most to all filed under "atheist" are also "by default" atheists. I suspect many filed under "agnostic" are actually "by default" atheists. I think that most of the "theists" still have a lot of "agnostic" in them. To be honest with ones self is to say "I really don't and can't know for sure". Moose Professor, geology, Whatsamatta U Evolution - Changes in the environment, caused by the interactions of the components of the environment. "Do not meddle in the affairs of cats, for they are subtle and will piss on your computer." - Bruce Graham "The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness." - John Kenneth Galbraith "I know a little about a lot of things, and a lot about a few things, but I'm highly ignorant about everything." - Moose
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
U can call me Cookie Member (Idle past 4974 days) Posts: 228 From: jo'burg, RSA Joined: |
I be Agnostic, if you please.
Gonna have to disagree with Moose here. I tend to think that, at a push, most atheists would agree that they cannot totally deny the possibility of the existence of God/Gods without moving into almost a "faith" position. So technically, one could regard them as agnostics as well. Maybe this is true of some theists as well (that God/Gods might possibly not exist), somewhere in the dark recesses of their minds... this would of course swell the agnostic camp substantially "The good Christian should beware the mathematician and all those who make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that the mathematicians have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and to confine man in the bonds of hell." - St. Augustine
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Fragallrocks Inactive Member |
Don't know if you want to count my vote I think I have only made two or three posts in the three years I have been reading this board. But if you do it would agnostic leaning to theism. Almost a Quaker.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Wounded King Member Posts: 4149 From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Joined: |
Gonna have to disagree with Moose here. I tend to think that, at a push, most atheists would agree that they cannot totally deny the possibility of the existence of God/Gods without moving into almost a "faith" position. So technically, one could regard them as agnostics as well. I don't think you really are disgreeing with him, in fact you seem to be saying something pretty similar but you have just come to a different conclusion as to which label should be applied to those with no compelling belief in, yet who recognise that they can't know for certain that there is no, god. I suspect that Moose's classification is more in line with the thinking of a number of the theists on the board. I'm sure Ray (Herepton) would classify a large proportion of those who have described themselves as agnostics as atheists. This may be one reason for the disparity in views on atheists outnumbering theis that NJ brought this up to solve, a lot of those who self identify as agnostics obviously appear to be atheists to many of the theist members. As for me, I am another who is philosophically agnostic but functionally atheist. So I would put myself in the agnostic category. TTFN, WK
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2191 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Saying that Agnostics "don't know what to do" with what we do or don't know seems to imply that; 1) one must "do" something with such knowledge at all, and 2) that Agnostics are having trouble or difficulty making up our minds. It would be more accurate to say that Agnostics take the position that it isn't possible to make up one's mind.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2191 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Thank you!
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024