Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,415 Year: 3,672/9,624 Month: 543/974 Week: 156/276 Day: 30/23 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Poll; theist, atheist or agnostic
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 151 of 295 (340093)
08-14-2006 9:06 PM
Reply to: Message 150 by Nighttrain
08-14-2006 9:04 PM


Re: Breakdown
Actually, they can. A good chunk of those theists are evolutionists.

"These monkeys are at once the ugliest and the most beautiful creatures on the planet./ And the monkeys don't want to be monkeys; they want to be something else./ But they're not."
-- Ernie Cline

This message is a reply to:
 Message 150 by Nighttrain, posted 08-14-2006 9:04 PM Nighttrain has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 152 by Faith, posted 08-14-2006 9:37 PM Chiroptera has not replied
 Message 154 by robinrohan, posted 08-14-2006 10:40 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1465 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 152 of 295 (340099)
08-14-2006 9:37 PM
Reply to: Message 151 by Chiroptera
08-14-2006 9:06 PM


Re: Breakdown
Most theists think that a Creator set it all in motion, don't they? That would be interesting broken down further anyway.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by Chiroptera, posted 08-14-2006 9:06 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 157 by anglagard, posted 08-14-2006 11:08 PM Faith has not replied

mick
Member (Idle past 5007 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 153 of 295 (340101)
08-14-2006 9:48 PM


pop me down too
i vote atheist

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 154 of 295 (340102)
08-14-2006 10:40 PM
Reply to: Message 151 by Chiroptera
08-14-2006 9:06 PM


Re: Breakdown
A good chunk of those theists are evolutionists
Yeah, I'm wondering how they reconcile it. But that is for another thread.

"Your friends, if they can, may bury you with some distinction, and set up a monument, to let posterity see that your dust lies under such a stone; and when that is done, all is done. Your place is filled up by another, the world is just in the same state it was, you are blotted out of its sight, and as much forgotten by the world as if you had never belonged to it."--William Law

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by Chiroptera, posted 08-14-2006 9:06 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 155 of 295 (340110)
08-14-2006 11:04 PM
Reply to: Message 150 by Nighttrain
08-14-2006 9:04 PM


Re: Breakdown
One thing the list proves is that creos can`t say they are heavily outnumbered at EVC. At least at this point in time.
That's not true at all. This list has nothing to do with the creation/evolution debate. As you can see, the Theist list contains many prominent theistic evolutionists. And of those that voted as Theists, there are only a handful who are Christian and creationists. There are very few here.

“If chance be the father of all flesh then disaster is his rainbow in the sky. And when you hear of, state of emergencies, sniper kills ten, youths go looting, bomb blasts school, it is but the sound of man worshipping his maker” -Steve Turner

This message is a reply to:
 Message 150 by Nighttrain, posted 08-14-2006 9:04 PM Nighttrain has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 156 of 295 (340111)
08-14-2006 11:05 PM


Updating the updated updates
THEIST
1. Nemesis Juggernaut
2. Faith
3. Mjfloresta
4. Catholic Scientist
5. Percy
6. Iano
7. Arachnophilia
8. Buzsaw
9. Phat
10. Jazzns
11. Trixie
12. Tal
13. GDR
14. Anglagard
15. Purpledawn
AGNOSTIC
1. Creavolution
2. Omnivorous
3. Schrafinator
4. MangyTiger
5. Rail Bird
6. Rick JB
7. Inflixion
8. Tusko
9. Ekman
10. ReverendDG
ATHEIST
1. Robinrohan
2. Ramoss
3. Subbie
4. Annafan
5. Chronos
6. Corpagyps
7. Randy Feagley
8. Crashfrog
9. Mutty6969
10. CK
11. Chiroptera
12. Michael
13. Nighttrain
14. NosyNed
15. Jaderis
16. Parasomnium
17. Quetzal
18. NeuroCycle
19. Mick
NONE OF OUR BUISNESS
1. DrJones
RINGO-- IN A CLASS BY HIMSELF
1. RINGO (there can only be one Ringo to rule them all)

Replies to this message:
 Message 162 by Fragallrocks, posted 08-15-2006 4:42 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 857 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 157 of 295 (340116)
08-14-2006 11:08 PM
Reply to: Message 152 by Faith
08-14-2006 9:37 PM


Breakdown in Communication
The poll is limited to the simple question "do you believe in God or possibly in gods?"
There are four ultimately discrete answers:
1. No
2. Undecided
3. Yes
4. No comment
All responses have reasons behind them, some of which are easily, if not completely, traced in this forum.
quote:
Most theists think that a Creator set it all in motion, don't they? That would be interesting broken down further anyway.
As to your second point, while there may be reasons why one does or does not believe in God, once belief is presumed, there are many ways how one believes in God. There is pretty much only one way how one does not believe in, or is undecided, about belief in God. The 'how' of belief automatically becomes irrelevant. The 'how' of belief, as it is personal and not subject to scientific proof, to paraphrase Einstein, becomes as diverse as the personal characteristics of the beliver, provided one does not become overly enraptured by other personalities, be they living or presume to speak from a position of absolute and unquestioning authority for their interpretation of past events. Therefore it should be no surprise there is a tremendous variety among self-described theists.
Yes, it would be interesting, as IMHO there are many ways to God, to each according to our understanding.
As to your first point, not all belief systems assume a completely linear relationship between creator and created, however I have digressed enough. Perhaps the best place to elaborate upon one's 'how' is through the thread of the personal belief statement rather than a poll with a limited number of discrete outcomes.
Edited by anglagard, : forgot backslash in quote

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by Faith, posted 08-14-2006 9:37 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 158 by robinrohan, posted 08-14-2006 11:24 PM anglagard has replied
 Message 168 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-15-2006 10:07 AM anglagard has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 158 of 295 (340119)
08-14-2006 11:24 PM
Reply to: Message 157 by anglagard
08-14-2006 11:08 PM


Re: Breakdown in Communication
there are many ways how one believes in God.
I beg your pardon? "Ways" and "how" don't exactly go together.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 157 by anglagard, posted 08-14-2006 11:08 PM anglagard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 159 by anglagard, posted 08-14-2006 11:47 PM robinrohan has not replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 857 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 159 of 295 (340123)
08-14-2006 11:47 PM
Reply to: Message 158 by robinrohan
08-14-2006 11:24 PM


Re: Breakdown in Communication
I beg your pardon? "Ways" and "how" don't exactly go together.
Intended to mean, although not exclusively meaning, there is a difference between the Western "Judeo-Christian-Islamic" concept of God and that of many other societies. The "way" means "different" the how means "in both philosophic belief and in practice."
Admittedly, it may not be proper English. Sorry for the breakdown in communication.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by robinrohan, posted 08-14-2006 11:24 PM robinrohan has not replied

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 160 of 295 (340137)
08-15-2006 12:46 AM


Atheist
Agnostic, defaulting to atheist.
Having no reason to be a theist, I default to atheist.
I suspect most to all filed under "atheist" are also "by default" atheists. I suspect many filed under "agnostic" are actually "by default" atheists.
I think that most of the "theists" still have a lot of "agnostic" in them.
To be honest with ones self is to say "I really don't and can't know for sure".
Moose

Professor, geology, Whatsamatta U
Evolution - Changes in the environment, caused by the interactions of the components of the environment.
"Do not meddle in the affairs of cats, for they are subtle and will piss on your computer." - Bruce Graham
"The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness." - John Kenneth Galbraith
"I know a little about a lot of things, and a lot about a few things, but I'm highly ignorant about everything." - Moose

Replies to this message:
 Message 170 by ekman, posted 08-15-2006 10:16 AM Minnemooseus has not replied

U can call me Cookie
Member (Idle past 4974 days)
Posts: 228
From: jo'burg, RSA
Joined: 11-15-2005


Message 161 of 295 (340151)
08-15-2006 2:52 AM
Reply to: Message 147 by Hyroglyphx
08-14-2006 1:14 PM


Re: Don't you just love 'labels?'
I be Agnostic, if you please.
Gonna have to disagree with Moose here. I tend to think that, at a push, most atheists would agree that they cannot totally deny the possibility of the existence of God/Gods without moving into almost a "faith" position. So technically, one could regard them as agnostics as well.
Maybe this is true of some theists as well (that God/Gods might possibly not exist), somewhere in the dark recesses of their minds...
this would of course swell the agnostic camp substantially

"The good Christian should beware the mathematician and all those who make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that the mathematicians have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and to confine man in the bonds of hell." - St. Augustine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-14-2006 1:14 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 163 by Wounded King, posted 08-15-2006 5:02 AM U can call me Cookie has not replied
 Message 186 by Nighttrain, posted 08-15-2006 8:15 PM U can call me Cookie has not replied

Fragallrocks
Inactive Member


Message 162 of 295 (340154)
08-15-2006 4:42 AM
Reply to: Message 156 by Hyroglyphx
08-14-2006 11:05 PM


Re: Updating the updated updates
Don't know if you want to count my vote I think I have only made two or three posts in the three years I have been reading this board. But if you do it would agnostic leaning to theism. Almost a Quaker.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-14-2006 11:05 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 163 of 295 (340156)
08-15-2006 5:02 AM
Reply to: Message 161 by U can call me Cookie
08-15-2006 2:52 AM


Re: Don't you just love 'labels?'
Gonna have to disagree with Moose here. I tend to think that, at a push, most atheists would agree that they cannot totally deny the possibility of the existence of God/Gods without moving into almost a "faith" position. So technically, one could regard them as agnostics as well.
I don't think you really are disgreeing with him, in fact you seem to be saying something pretty similar but you have just come to a different conclusion as to which label should be applied to those with no compelling belief in, yet who recognise that they can't know for certain that there is no, god.
I suspect that Moose's classification is more in line with the thinking of a number of the theists on the board. I'm sure Ray (Herepton) would classify a large proportion of those who have described themselves as agnostics as atheists.
This may be one reason for the disparity in views on atheists outnumbering theis that NJ brought this up to solve, a lot of those who self identify as agnostics obviously appear to be atheists to many of the theist members.
As for me, I am another who is philosophically agnostic but functionally atheist. So I would put myself in the agnostic category.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 161 by U can call me Cookie, posted 08-15-2006 2:52 AM U can call me Cookie has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 164 of 295 (340197)
08-15-2006 9:47 AM
Reply to: Message 112 by Buzsaw
08-12-2006 11:02 PM


Re: Applicable to Agnosticism
quote:
Specifically why is it not applicable to agnosticism?
Saying that Agnostics "don't know what to do" with what we do or don't know seems to imply that;
1) one must "do" something with such knowledge at all, and
2) that Agnostics are having trouble or difficulty making up our minds.
It would be more accurate to say that Agnostics take the position that it isn't possible to make up one's mind.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 112 by Buzsaw, posted 08-12-2006 11:02 PM Buzsaw has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 165 of 295 (340200)
08-15-2006 9:51 AM
Reply to: Message 128 by MangyTiger
08-13-2006 4:19 PM


Re: Swing Vote
quote:
Nicely put summary of the agnostic viewpoint (well at least mine as well as yours).
Thank you!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by MangyTiger, posted 08-13-2006 4:19 PM MangyTiger has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024