Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,356 Year: 3,613/9,624 Month: 484/974 Week: 97/276 Day: 25/23 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is bicamerality bullshit?
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 46 of 126 (449331)
01-17-2008 6:08 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by Fosdick
01-17-2008 5:47 PM


Re: Back to bicamerality
I'm doing that because I don't know what else to call "hearing God's voice and speaking with Him."
I would be inclined to call that schizophrenia or self-delusion, though in some cases it is probably a matter of lying by the person who claims that experience.

Let's end the political smears

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Fosdick, posted 01-17-2008 5:47 PM Fosdick has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by faust, posted 01-17-2008 6:48 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5519 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 47 of 126 (449332)
01-17-2008 6:15 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by macaroniandcheese
01-17-2008 5:37 PM


Re: Bicamerality = Imagination?
brennakimi writes:
are you then suggesting that you're more evolved than the religious? that's an awfully self-righteous assumption for you to make.
Yes. But why is it "self-righteous" of me if I am not bicameral? Why isn't bicamerality the true landscape of self-righteousness? How could I call myself "self-righteous" if I don't believe in God or don't hear bicameral voices? Is it self-righteous of me to believe that I'm more evolved than people who say I will go to hell if I don't believe as they do?
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-17-2008 5:37 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-17-2008 6:18 PM Fosdick has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3947 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 48 of 126 (449333)
01-17-2008 6:18 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Fosdick
01-17-2008 6:15 PM


Re: Bicamerality = Imagination?
Is it self-righteous of me to believe that I'm more evolved than people who say I will go to hell if I don't believe as they do?
i'm not talking to you anymore.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Fosdick, posted 01-17-2008 6:15 PM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by Fosdick, posted 01-17-2008 6:57 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied

  
faust 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5928 days)
Posts: 16
Joined: 01-16-2008


Message 49 of 126 (449349)
01-17-2008 6:48 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by nwr
01-17-2008 6:08 PM


Re: Back to bicamerality
quote:
I would be inclined to call that schizophrenia or self-delusion, though in some cases it is probably a matter of lying by the person who claims that experience.
Certain hallucinogens can cause auditory hallucinations. The nightshade family is known for it. Particularly belladonna and datura.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by nwr, posted 01-17-2008 6:08 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5519 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 50 of 126 (449352)
01-17-2008 6:57 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by macaroniandcheese
01-17-2008 6:18 PM


Re: Bicamerality = Imagination?
brennakimi writes:
Is it self-righteous of me to believe that I'm more evolved than people who say I will go to hell if I don't believe as they do?
i'm not talking to you anymore.
Why not? Does my honesty offend you?
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-17-2008 6:18 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 51 of 126 (449354)
01-17-2008 6:59 PM


By Definition....
As per the definition of concious it is real; it exists and is operative in intelligent life and perhaps may be bicameral.
Some of us have had experiences which would be considered metaphysical. We can't prove that, but we know it from experience. One must be connected with the metaphysical; i.e. on line so to speak via a connection or medium. As I understand the word, bicameral, we would consider ourselves to have a bicameral conciousness.
Merriam Webster Definition Of Concious:
1: perceiving, apprehending, or noticing with a degree of controlled thought or observation
2archaic : sharing another's knowledge or awareness of an inward state or outward fact
3: personally felt
4: capable of or marked by thought, will, design, or perception
5: self-conscious
6: having mental faculties undulled by sleep, faintness, or stupor : awake
7: done or acting with critical awareness
8 a: likely to notice, consider, or appraise
b: being concerned or interested c: marked by strong feelings or notions
Conscious Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Fosdick, posted 01-17-2008 8:31 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5519 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 52 of 126 (449395)
01-17-2008 8:31 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by Buzsaw
01-17-2008 6:59 PM


Re: By Definition....
Buz, do you think it is possible for one person to communicate what human consciousness means to another without either one being totally dependent upon the use of metaphors and analogs?
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Buzsaw, posted 01-17-2008 6:59 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1363 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 53 of 126 (449437)
01-17-2008 10:08 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Fosdick
01-17-2008 5:41 PM


Re: Bicamerality = Imagination?
What would Rev. Falwell say about that?
Nothing, he's dead.
Shouldn't be too much trouble for a bicameral person like, say, Benny Hinn, to simply ask God to ask Jerry the question and then get back to him. We all could know within day.
hoot, you haven't even demonstrated that human mind ever was bicameral (it wasn't), or that bicamerality would produce such things (it doesn't). and that's a far cry from asserting that people today have some mental defect.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Fosdick, posted 01-17-2008 5:41 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1363 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 54 of 126 (449439)
01-17-2008 10:13 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by Fosdick
01-17-2008 5:47 PM


Re: Back to bicamerality
nwr writes:
I wondering what you mean by "bicameral". What you are saying doesn't match what I take to be the usual meaning.
Yes, I have strayed somewhat from the usual meaning.
yes, a lot like ray strays from the usual meaning of "darwinism." one of the first signs of a commitment to a bad ideology is when you have to start redefining words with accepted meanings.
I'm doing that because I don't know what else to call "hearing God's voice and speaking with Him." I'm calling it "bicameral." What would you call it? Just more Tinkerbell foolishness?
actually hearing voices that you think are god is called "schizophrenia." i think you'll find that a good man people who claim to communicate with god are not schizophrenic. some might be liars, but most just want to fit in or have been conditioned to believe certain parts of the their normal conscious internal dialog are god.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Fosdick, posted 01-17-2008 5:47 PM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by Buzsaw, posted 01-18-2008 10:58 AM arachnophilia has replied
 Message 56 by Fosdick, posted 01-18-2008 10:58 AM arachnophilia has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 126 (449558)
01-18-2008 10:58 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by arachnophilia
01-17-2008 10:13 PM


Re: Back to bicamerality
According to Merriam Webster the definition of bicameral is two legislative chambers, (i.e. as I understand that, two operative avenues of concious determination.)
Examples as I understand this would be the two conciously operative legislative chambers of our government or the physical and metaphysical realms of existence as some of us Biblical creationists claim to be conciously operative.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by arachnophilia, posted 01-17-2008 10:13 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by nwr, posted 01-18-2008 1:09 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 63 by arachnophilia, posted 01-19-2008 3:02 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5519 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 56 of 126 (449559)
01-18-2008 10:58 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by arachnophilia
01-17-2008 10:13 PM


Bicamerality = Schizophrenia?
actually hearing voices that you think are god is called "schizophrenia."
Yes, and that was Jaynes' point. Bicameral people who pray to God and get answers are actually suffering from symptoms of schizophrenia. This means 40% of Americans are suffering from bicameral schizophrenia, including our consciousness-challenged president.
Maybe you ought to read Jaynes' book. You're letting others form your opinions for you.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by arachnophilia, posted 01-17-2008 10:13 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by nwr, posted 01-18-2008 1:13 PM Fosdick has replied
 Message 61 by Buzsaw, posted 01-18-2008 7:44 PM Fosdick has not replied
 Message 64 by arachnophilia, posted 01-19-2008 3:10 AM Fosdick has not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 57 of 126 (449603)
01-18-2008 1:09 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by Buzsaw
01-18-2008 10:58 AM


Re: Back to bicamerality
According to Merriam Webster the definition of bicameral is two legislative chambers, (i.e. as I understand that, two operative avenues of concious determination.)
Jaynes was using the term to refer to the alleged separation between left brain and right brain.

Let's end the political smears

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by Buzsaw, posted 01-18-2008 10:58 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 58 of 126 (449604)
01-18-2008 1:13 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by Fosdick
01-18-2008 10:58 AM


Re: Bicamerality = Schizophrenia?
Bicameral people who pray to God and get answers are actually suffering from symptoms of schizophrenia.
I doubt that.
Most people who talk of "hearing God talk to them" are using that phrase metaphorically, and will admit that they are using it metaphorically if asked.

Let's end the political smears

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by Fosdick, posted 01-18-2008 10:58 AM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by Fosdick, posted 01-18-2008 4:45 PM nwr has replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5519 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 59 of 126 (449663)
01-18-2008 4:45 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by nwr
01-18-2008 1:13 PM


Re: Bicamerality = Schizophrenia?
nwr writes:
Most people who talk of "hearing God talk to them" are using that phrase metaphorically, and will admit that they are using it metaphorically if asked.
Yes, of course. Does anybody ever talk without using metaphors. This is what Jaynes was talking about”metaphors”and using metaphors to talk about them.
My point, as is Jaynes', is that bicamerality and schizophrenia are not too far apart. And bicamerality is a political imperative. Do you suppose someone could be elected president of the United States if he or she claimed to have never prayed or spoken with God? Even if you never did you better say you did and lie about your bicamerality. Otherwise you'll lose all your bicameral voters, who amount to about 40% of the electorate.
Sad but true: In bicamerality we trust.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by nwr, posted 01-18-2008 1:13 PM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by nwr, posted 01-18-2008 5:22 PM Fosdick has not replied
 Message 65 by arachnophilia, posted 01-19-2008 3:24 AM Fosdick has not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 60 of 126 (449669)
01-18-2008 5:22 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Fosdick
01-18-2008 4:45 PM


Re: Bicamerality = Schizophrenia?
My point, as is Jaynes', is that bicamerality and schizophrenia are not too far apart.
You seem to be using "bicamerality" to mean something like "religiosity." And, sorry, that is not at all similar to schizophrenia.

Let's end the political smears

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Fosdick, posted 01-18-2008 4:45 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024