Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Belief in God is scientific.
Yakuzi
Junior Member (Idle past 3864 days)
Posts: 8
Joined: 08-27-2013


Message 256 of 262 (705502)
08-28-2013 7:09 AM
Reply to: Message 247 by Ossat
04-12-2013 5:14 AM


not cumulative changes will ever create new species, nor they have done in the past
1. You're making unfounded statements (refs please)
2. Speciation has been observed in nature as well as under laboratory conditions (Seach for "speciation" in PubMed or Google Scholar)
3. Comparative genomics of humans and chimps/bonobos demonstrate that we shared an ancient common ancestor, just as comparative genomics of you and your sibling would demonstrate that you shared a recent common ancestor. (Nielsen et al 2005, Polavarapu et al 2006)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 247 by Ossat, posted 04-12-2013 5:14 AM Ossat has not replied

  
kishan
Junior Member (Idle past 3380 days)
Posts: 5
Joined: 12-12-2014


Message 257 of 262 (745689)
12-26-2014 3:45 AM


Yes in science God is considered be the biggest energy neither be created neither be destroy.

Replies to this message:
 Message 258 by jar, posted 12-26-2014 8:37 AM kishan has not replied
 Message 259 by Larni, posted 12-26-2014 9:08 AM kishan has not replied
 Message 260 by ringo, posted 12-27-2014 12:16 PM kishan has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 258 of 262 (745697)
12-26-2014 8:37 AM
Reply to: Message 257 by kishan
12-26-2014 3:45 AM


Yes in science God is considered be the biggest energy neither be created neither be destroy.
I'm sorry but that just sounds like bullshit. Do you have any evidence that might support such a silly assertion?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 257 by kishan, posted 12-26-2014 3:45 AM kishan has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 259 of 262 (745700)
12-26-2014 9:08 AM
Reply to: Message 257 by kishan
12-26-2014 3:45 AM


Incorrect.
Science makes no statements about God.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 257 by kishan, posted 12-26-2014 3:45 AM kishan has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 412 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 260 of 262 (745792)
12-27-2014 12:16 PM
Reply to: Message 257 by kishan
12-26-2014 3:45 AM


kishan writes:
Yes in science God is considered be the biggest energy neither be created neither be destroy.
E'God
Edited by ringo, : Added quote.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 257 by kishan, posted 12-26-2014 3:45 AM kishan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 261 by Phat, posted 12-28-2014 5:35 AM ringo has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18262
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 261 of 262 (745825)
12-28-2014 5:35 AM
Reply to: Message 260 by ringo
12-27-2014 12:16 PM


That reminds me of something somebody once said. Emotion can be expressed as E-Motion. Energy in motion.

Saying, "I don't know," is the same as saying, "Maybe."~ZombieRingo
It's easy to see the speck in somebody else's ideas - unless it's blocked by the beam in your own.~Ringo
If a savage stops believing in his wooden god, it does not mean that there is no God only that God is not wooden. (Leo Tolstoy)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 260 by ringo, posted 12-27-2014 12:16 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 262 by ringo, posted 12-28-2014 1:23 PM Phat has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 412 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 262 of 262 (745848)
12-28-2014 1:23 PM
Reply to: Message 261 by Phat
12-28-2014 5:35 AM


Phat writes:
Emotion can be expressed as E-Motion. Energy in motion.
I think the physics is a little off.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 261 by Phat, posted 12-28-2014 5:35 AM Phat has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024