|
|
Msg
Num
|
Message Details
|
Reply To
|
Replies
|
|
1
|
Message 1
By RAZD
11-19-2005 9:47 PM |
|
|
|
|
2
|
Message 2
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
bump for randman (Message 3)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 7:59 AM |
Message 1
By RAZD
11-19-2005 9:47 PM |
|
|
|
4
|
Randman: can you show the moths are NOT an example of natural selection? (Message 4)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 9:24 AM |
Message 1
By RAZD
11-19-2005 9:47 PM |
|
|
|
5
|
Excelent thread RAZD (Message 5)
By Yaro
11-20-2005 10:51 AM |
|
|
|
|
6
|
Misreading Randman (Message 6)
|
Randman: can you show the moths are NOT an example of natural selection? (Message 4)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 9:24 AM |
|
|
|
7
|
pretty much nuggins nails it (Message 7)
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
but you missed answering the question ... (Message 8)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 6:32 PM |
pretty much nuggins nails it (Message 7)
|
|
|
|
9
|
Re: but you missed answering the question ... (Message 9)
|
but you missed answering the question ... (Message 8)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 6:32 PM |
|
|
|
10
|
So it is natural selection ... (Message 10)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 6:48 PM |
Re: but you missed answering the question ... (Message 9)
|
|
|
|
11
|
Re: but you missed answering the question ... (Message 11)
|
Re: but you missed answering the question ... (Message 9)
|
|
|
|
12
|
Re: but you missed answering the question ... (Message 12)
|
Re: but you missed answering the question ... (Message 9)
|
|
|
|
13
|
ignorance is bliss for some evos (Message 13)
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
Message 14
|
ignorance is bliss for some evos (Message 13)
|
|
|
|
15
|
Re: ignorance is bliss for some evos (Message 15)
By JonF
11-20-2005 8:01 PM |
ignorance is bliss for some evos (Message 13)
|
|
|
|
16
|
If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selection? (Message 16)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 8:40 PM |
ignorance is bliss for some evos (Message 13)
|
|
|
|
17
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selection? (Message 17)
|
If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selection? (Message 16)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 8:40 PM |
|
|
|
18
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 18)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selection? (Message 17)
|
|
|
|
19
|
mere unfounded claims (Message 19)
|
Message 14
|
|
|
|
20
|
Re: mere unfounded claims (Message 20)
|
mere unfounded claims (Message 19)
|
|
|
|
21
|
Re: mere unfounded claims (Message 21)
|
Re: mere unfounded claims (Message 20)
|
|
|
|
22
|
evolution 101 (Message 22)
|
Re: mere unfounded claims (Message 21)
|
|
|
|
23
|
Bat's, no bats, same difference (Message 23)
By Yaro
11-20-2005 9:21 PM |
|
|
|
|
24
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 24)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 18)
|
|
|
|
25
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 25)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 9:25 PM |
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selection? (Message 17)
|
|
|
|
26
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 26)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 25)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 9:25 PM |
|
|
|
27
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 27)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 24)
|
|
|
|
28
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 28)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 25)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 9:25 PM |
|
|
|
29
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 29)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 27)
|
|
|
|
30
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 30)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 28)
|
|
|
|
31
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 31)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 29)
|
|
|
|
32
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 32)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 30)
|
|
|
|
33
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 33)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 31)
|
|
|
|
34
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 34)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 32)
|
|
|
|
35
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 35)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 33)
|
|
|
|
36
|
Re: ignorance is bliss for some evos (Message 36)
|
ignorance is bliss for some evos (Message 13)
|
|
|
|
37
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 37)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 10:11 PM |
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 28)
|
|
|
|
38
|
Re: ignorance is bliss for some evos (Message 38)
|
Re: ignorance is bliss for some evos (Message 36)
|
|
|
|
39
|
Re: ignorance is bliss for some evos (Message 39)
|
Re: ignorance is bliss for some evos (Message 38)
|
|
|
|
40
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 40)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 37)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 10:11 PM |
|
|
|
41
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 41)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 10:39 PM |
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 26)
|
|
|
|
42
|
my response (Message 42)
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 43)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 41)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 10:39 PM |
|
|
|
44
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 44)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 11:09 PM |
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 43)
|
|
|
|
45
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 45)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 11:12 PM |
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 40)
|
|
|
|
46
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 46)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 45)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 11:12 PM |
|
|
|
47
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 47)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 46)
|
|
|
|
48
|
I WIN! (Message 48)
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 49)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 47)
|
|
|
|
50
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 50)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 49)
|
|
|
|
51
|
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 51)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 11:42 PM |
my response (Message 42)
|
|
|
|
52
|
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 52)
|
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 51)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 11:42 PM |
|
|
|
53
|
Repeated claims do not make em more valid, (Message 53)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 11:47 PM |
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 46)
|
|
|
|
54
|
Re: Repeated claims do not make em more valid, (Message 54)
|
Repeated claims do not make em more valid, (Message 53)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 11:47 PM |
|
|
|
55
|
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 55)
By RAZD
11-21-2005 12:05 AM |
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 52)
|
|
|
|
56
|
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 56)
|
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 55)
By RAZD
11-21-2005 12:05 AM |
|
|
|
57
|
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 57)
|
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 56)
|
|
|
|
58
|
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 58)
|
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 57)
|
|
|
|
59
|
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 59)
|
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 58)
|
|
|
|
60
|
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 60)
|
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 59)
|
|
|
|
61
|
Natural selection (Message 61)
|
Re: mere unfounded claims (Message 21)
|
|
|
|
62
|
Re: Natural selection (Message 62)
|
Natural selection (Message 61)
|
|
|
|
63
|
like learning santa claus isn't real (Message 63)
|
Natural selection (Message 61)
|
|
|
|
64
|
Re: mere unfounded claims (Message 64)
|
mere unfounded claims (Message 19)
|
|
|
|
65
|
Slow down everyone (Message 65)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 26)
|
|
|
|
66
|
Good Grief, Charlie Brown (Message 66)
|
Re: mere unfounded claims (Message 21)
|
|
|
|
67
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 67)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 40)
|
|
|
|
68
|
Re: Good Grief, Charlie Brown (Message 68)
|
Good Grief, Charlie Brown (Message 66)
|
|
|
|
69
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 69)
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 67)
|
|
|
|
70
|
Re: my response (Message 70)
|
my response (Message 42)
|
|
|
|
71
|
Acting Batty (Message 71)
|
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 58)
|
|
|
|
72
|
Evolution means... (Message 72)
|
Re: Natural selection (Message 62)
|
|
|
|
73
|
Re: Evolution means... (Message 73)
|
Evolution means... (Message 72)
|
|
|
|
74
|
Re: Natural selection (Message 74)
|
Re: Natural selection (Message 62)
|
|
|
|
75
|
Forum Guidelines Warning (Message 75)
By Admin
11-21-2005 8:04 AM |
mere unfounded claims (Message 19)
|
|
|
|
76
|
Forum Guidelines Warning II (Message 76)
By Admin
11-21-2005 8:07 AM |
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 24)
|
|
|
|
77
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 77)
By Percy
11-21-2005 8:30 AM |
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 28)
|
|
|
|
78
|
Forum Guidelines Warning III (Message 78)
By Admin
11-21-2005 8:33 AM |
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 32)
|
|
|
|
79
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 79)
By Percy
11-21-2005 8:38 AM |
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 32)
|
|
|
|
80
|
Forum Guidelines Warning IV (Message 80)
By Admin
11-21-2005 8:46 AM |
my response (Message 42)
|
|
|
|
81
|
Forum Guidelines Warning (Message 81)
By Admin
11-21-2005 8:51 AM |
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 47)
|
|
|
|
82
|
Forum Guidelines Warning (Message 82)
By Admin
11-21-2005 8:55 AM |
Repeated claims do not make em more valid, (Message 53)
By RAZD
11-20-2005 11:47 PM |
|
|
|
83
|
Forum Guidelines Warning V (Message 83)
By Admin
11-21-2005 9:00 AM |
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 56)
|
|
|
|
84
|
Forum Guidelines Warning (Message 84)
By Admin
11-21-2005 9:04 AM |
Re: mere unfounded claims (Message 64)
|
|
|
|
85
|
Re: Good Grief, Charlie Brown (Message 85)
By Percy
11-21-2005 9:19 AM |
Re: Good Grief, Charlie Brown (Message 68)
|
|
|
|
86
|
Re: my response (Message 86)
By JonF
11-21-2005 9:43 AM |
my response (Message 42)
|
|
|
|
87
|
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 87)
By Percy
11-21-2005 9:52 AM |
Re: If it is natural selection, what is false about protraying it as natural selectio (Message 69)
|
|
|
|
88
|
Re: Forum Guidelines Warning (Message 88)
|
Forum Guidelines Warning (Message 84)
By Admin
11-21-2005 9:04 AM |
|
|
|
89
|
General interest and easy reading (Message 89)
|
|
|
|
90
|
Warning, un-constructive off-topic comment. (Message 90)
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
Re: Warning, un-constructive off-topic comment. (Message 91)
|
Warning, un-constructive off-topic comment. (Message 90)
|
|
|
|
92
|
Re: Forum Guidelines Warning (Message 92)
|
Forum Guidelines Warning (Message 81)
By Admin
11-21-2005 8:51 AM |
|
|
|
93
|
Re: Good Grief, Charlie Brown (Message 93)
|
Re: Good Grief, Charlie Brown (Message 68)
|
|
|
|
94
|
interchanging 'evolution' with 'the theory of evolution' (Message 94)
|
Re: Good Grief, Charlie Brown (Message 68)
|
|
|
|
95
|
Re: interchanging 'evolution' with 'the theory of evolution' (Message 95)
|
interchanging 'evolution' with 'the theory of evolution' (Message 94)
|
|
|
|
96
|
Re: homework, insults and substantiation (Message 96)
By RAZD
11-21-2005 8:06 PM |
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 56)
|
|
|
|
97
|
Re: homework, insults and substantiation (Message 97)
|
Re: homework, insults and substantiation (Message 96)
By RAZD
11-21-2005 8:06 PM |
|
|
|
98
|
Re: homework, and results. (Message 98)
By RAZD
11-21-2005 11:20 PM |
Re: homework, insults and substantiation (Message 97)
|
|
|
|
99
|
Re: homework, and results. (Message 99)
|
Re: homework, and results. (Message 98)
By RAZD
11-21-2005 11:20 PM |
|
|
|
100
|
wait. i'm lost. (Message 100)
|
Re: homework, and results. (Message 99)
|
|
|
|
101
|
Re: wait. i'm lost. (Message 101)
|
wait. i'm lost. (Message 100)
|
|
|
|
102
|
Re: wait. i'm lost. (Message 102)
|
Re: wait. i'm lost. (Message 101)
|
|
|
|
103
|
Re: wait. i'm lost. (Message 103)
|
Re: wait. i'm lost. (Message 102)
|
|
|
|
104
|
Re: wait. i'm lost. (Message 104)
|
Re: wait. i'm lost. (Message 103)
|
|
|
|
105
|
Dark Moths, White trees. (Message 105)
|
Re: homework, and results. (Message 99)
|
|
|
|
106
|
Extinction by predation (Message 106)
|
Re: wait. i'm lost. (Message 101)
|
|
|
|
107
|
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 107)
|
Re: my response, bad as it was the first time and worse for repetition. (Message 52)
|
|
|
|
108
|
Re: Dark Moths, White trees. (Message 108)
|
Dark Moths, White trees. (Message 105)
|
|
|
|
109
|
Re: homework, and results. (Message 109)
By RAZD
11-22-2005 9:35 PM |
Re: homework, and results. (Message 99)
|
|
|
|
110
|
Re: Dark Moths, White trees. (Message 110)
|
Re: Dark Moths, White trees. (Message 108)
|
|
|
|
111
|
Re: Dark Moths, White trees. (Message 111)
|
Re: Dark Moths, White trees. (Message 110)
|
|
|
|
112
|
Re: Dark Moths, White trees. (Message 112)
By Percy
11-23-2005 2:57 PM |
Re: Dark Moths, White trees. (Message 111)
|
|
|
|
113
|
Re: Dark Moths, {not "White" - just} Non-polluted trees. Anomalies. (Message 113)
By RAZD
11-24-2005 12:54 AM |
Re: Dark Moths, White trees. (Message 112)
By Percy
11-23-2005 2:57 PM |
|
|
|
114
|
Dark Moths, non-Polluted trees, Anomalies and Professional Studies. (Message 114)
By RAZD
11-24-2005 9:23 AM |
Re: Dark Moths, White trees. (Message 111)
|
|
|
|
115
|
Re: Dark Moths, {not "White" - just} Non-polluted trees. Anomalies. (Message 115)
|
Re: Dark Moths, {not "White" - just} Non-polluted trees. Anomalies. (Message 113)
By RAZD
11-24-2005 12:54 AM |
|
|
|
116
|
Re: Dark Moths, {not "White" - just} Non-polluted trees. Anomalies. (Message 116)
By Admin
11-26-2005 9:48 AM |
Re: Dark Moths, {not "White" - just} Non-polluted trees. Anomalies. (Message 115)
|
|
|
|
117
|
Re: Dark Moths, {not "White" - just} Non-polluted trees. Anomalies. (Message 117)
By RAZD
11-26-2005 9:56 AM |
Re: Dark Moths, {not "White" - just} Non-polluted trees. Anomalies. (Message 115)
|
|
|
|
118
|
Re: Dark Moths, {not "White" - just} Non-polluted trees. Anomalies. (Message 118)
|
Re: Dark Moths, {not "White" - just} Non-polluted trees. Anomalies. (Message 117)
By RAZD
11-26-2005 9:56 AM |
|
|
|
119
|
Taking this GR stuff elsewhere (Message 119)
|
Re: Dark Moths, {not "White" - just} Non-polluted trees. Anomalies. (Message 117)
By RAZD
11-26-2005 9:56 AM |
|
|
|
120
|
Re: Taking this GR stuff elsewhere (Message 120)
By RAZD
11-27-2005 4:02 PM |
Taking this GR stuff elsewhere (Message 119)
|
|
|
|
121
|
MartinV asserts fraud - but does he have integrity? (Message 121)
By RAZD
09-05-2006 7:42 PM |
|
|
|
|
122
|
Re: MartinV asserts fraud - but does he have integrity? (Message 122)
|
MartinV asserts fraud - but does he have integrity? (Message 121)
By RAZD
09-05-2006 7:42 PM |
|
|
|
123
|
Re: MartinV asserts fraud - but does he have integrity? (Message 123)
By PaulK
09-06-2006 9:15 AM |
Re: MartinV asserts fraud - but does he have integrity? (Message 122)
|
|
|
|
124
|
Re: MartinV asserts fraud - but does he have integrity? (Message 124)
|
Re: MartinV asserts fraud - but does he have integrity? (Message 123)
By PaulK
09-06-2006 9:15 AM |
|
|
|
125
|
MartinV has no integrity (Message 125)
By RAZD
09-06-2006 8:41 PM |
Re: MartinV asserts fraud - but does he have integrity? (Message 124)
|
|
|
|
126
|
Re: MartinV asserts fraud - but does he have integrity? (Message 126)
|
Re: MartinV asserts fraud - but does he have integrity? (Message 123)
By PaulK
09-06-2006 9:15 AM |
|
|
|
127
|
Re: MartinV asserts fraud - but does he have integrity? (Message 127)
By PaulK
09-07-2006 4:29 PM |
Re: MartinV asserts fraud - but does he have integrity? (Message 126)
|
|
|
|
128
|
Peppered moths are _really_ hard to find (Message 128)
By JonF
09-07-2006 7:48 PM |
Re: MartinV asserts fraud - but does he have integrity? (Message 126)
|
|
|
|
129
|
Message 129
By Faith
09-07-2006 9:00 PM |
|
|
|
|
130
|
How do I define a kind? (Message 130)
|
Message 129
By Faith
09-07-2006 9:00 PM |
|
|
|
131
|
Re: How do I define a kind? (Message 131)
|
How do I define a kind? (Message 130)
|
|
|
|
132
|
Re: How do I define a kind? (Message 132)
By Faith
09-07-2006 10:33 PM |
How do I define a kind? (Message 130)
|
|
|
133
|
It's quite obvious... (Message 133)
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
Re: MartinV asserts fraud - but does he have integrity? (Message 134)
By RAZD
09-08-2006 12:10 AM |
Re: MartinV asserts fraud - but does he have integrity? (Message 126)
|
|
|
|
135
|
thanks Faith ... (Message 135)
By RAZD
09-08-2006 12:12 AM |
Message 129
By Faith
09-07-2006 9:00 PM |
|
|
|
136
|
How do you define a kind? NOT HERE! (Message 136)
By RAZD
09-08-2006 12:14 AM |
How do I define a kind? (Message 130)
|
|
|
|
137
|
It's quite obvious... REALLY quite obvious! (Message 137)
By RAZD
09-08-2006 12:23 AM |
It's quite obvious... (Message 133)
|
|
|
|
138
|
Re: It's quite obvious... REALLY quite obvious! (Message 138)
|
It's quite obvious... REALLY quite obvious! (Message 137)
By RAZD
09-08-2006 12:23 AM |
|
|
|
139
|
Re: It's quite obvious... REALLY quite obvious! (Message 139)
By RAZD
09-08-2006 7:39 AM |
Re: It's quite obvious... REALLY quite obvious! (Message 138)
|
|
|
|
140
|
Re: It's quite obvious... (Message 140)
|
It's quite obvious... (Message 133)
|
|
|
|
141
|
Re: It's quite obvious... REALLY quite obvious! (Message 141)
By Admin
09-08-2006 11:10 AM |
Re: It's quite obvious... REALLY quite obvious! (Message 139)
By RAZD
09-08-2006 7:39 AM |
|
|
|
142
|
Another antidarwinistic hypothesis for industrial melanism (Message 142)
|
Peppered moths are _really_ hard to find (Message 128)
By JonF
09-07-2006 7:48 PM |
|
|
|
143
|
Re: Another antidarwinistic hypothesis for industrial melanism (Message 143)
|
Another antidarwinistic hypothesis for industrial melanism (Message 142)
|
|
|
|
144
|
Re: Another antidarwinistic hypothesis for industrial melanism (Message 144)
By PaulK
09-08-2006 1:32 PM |
Another antidarwinistic hypothesis for industrial melanism (Message 142)
|
|
|
|
145
|
Re: Another antidarwinistic hypothesis for industrial melanism (Message 145)
|
Re: Another antidarwinistic hypothesis for industrial melanism (Message 144)
By PaulK
09-08-2006 1:32 PM |
|
|
|
146
|
Re: Another antidarwinistic hypothesis for industrial melanism (Message 146)
|
Re: Another antidarwinistic hypothesis for industrial melanism (Message 143)
|
|
|
|
147
|
Re: Another antidarwinistic hypothesis for industrial melanism (Message 147)
By JonF
09-08-2006 2:01 PM |
Another antidarwinistic hypothesis for industrial melanism (Message 142)
|
|
|
|
148
|
Re: Another antidarwinistic hypothesis for industrial melanism (Message 148)
By JonF
09-08-2006 2:12 PM |
Another antidarwinistic hypothesis for industrial melanism (Message 142)
|
|
|
|
149
|
Re: Another antidarwinistic hypothesis for industrial melanism (Message 149)
By PaulK
09-08-2006 2:52 PM |
Re: Another antidarwinistic hypothesis for industrial melanism (Message 145)
|
|
|
|
150
|
he is the author of an "essay "... and a thread on it, is available (Message 150)
By RAZD
09-08-2006 6:46 PM |
Re: It's quite obvious... (Message 140)
|
|
|
|
151
|
Re: It's quite obvious... (Message 151)
|
Re: It's quite obvious... (Message 140)
|
|
|
152
|
Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 152)
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
Re: It's quite obvious... (Message 153)
By RAZD
09-08-2006 9:00 PM |
Re: It's quite obvious... (Message 151)
|
|
|
|
154
|
Re: Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 154)
By RAZD
09-08-2006 9:20 PM |
Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 152)
|
|
|
|
155
|
Re: Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 155)
|
Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 152)
|
|
|
|
156
|
Re: It's quite obvious... (Message 156)
|
Re: It's quite obvious... (Message 151)
|
|
|
157
|
ANYONE? (Message 157)
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
Re: ANYONE? (Message 158)
|
ANYONE? (Message 157)
|
|
|
159
|
Re: ANYONE? (Message 159)
|
Re: ANYONE? (Message 158)
|
|
|
|
160
|
Topic (Message 160)
|
Re: ANYONE? (Message 159)
|
|
|
|
161
|
Re: Topic (Message 161)
|
Topic (Message 160)
|
|
|
|
162
|
Re: Topic (Message 162)
|
Re: Topic (Message 161)
|
|
|
|
163
|
Re: Topic (Message 163)
|
Re: Topic (Message 162)
|
|
|
|
164
|
Re: It's quite obvious... (Message 164)
|
Re: It's quite obvious... (Message 153)
By RAZD
09-08-2006 9:00 PM |
|
|
|
165
|
math and creationist logic (Message 165)
By RAZD
09-09-2006 7:49 AM |
Re: It's quite obvious... (Message 164)
|
|
|
|
166
|
Re: ANYONE? (Message 166)
By RAZD
09-09-2006 8:08 AM |
ANYONE? (Message 157)
|
|
|
|
167
|
Back to the moths and natural selection (Message 167)
By RAZD
09-09-2006 8:21 AM |
Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 152)
|
|
|
|
168
|
Re: Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 168)
|
Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 152)
|
|
|
|
169
|
Evolution ... macro ... micro ... what's the diff? (Message 169)
By RAZD
09-09-2006 6:26 PM |
Re: Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 168)
|
|
|
|
170
|
Re: Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 170)
|
Re: Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 168)
|
|
|
|
171
|
Re: Evolution ... macro ... micro ... what's the diff? (Message 171)
|
Evolution ... macro ... micro ... what's the diff? (Message 169)
By RAZD
09-09-2006 6:26 PM |
|
|
|
172
|
logical fallacy then topic (Message 172)
By RAZD
09-09-2006 7:11 PM |
Re: Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 170)
|
|
|
|
173
|
Re: Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 173)
|
Re: Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 170)
|
|
|
|
174
|
Re: logical fallacy then topic (Message 174)
|
logical fallacy then topic (Message 172)
By RAZD
09-09-2006 7:11 PM |
|
|
|
175
|
Re: Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 175)
|
Re: Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 173)
|
|
|
|
176
|
Re: logical fallacy then topic (Message 176)
By RAZD
09-09-2006 9:11 PM |
Re: logical fallacy then topic (Message 174)
|
|
|
|
177
|
Re: Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 177)
|
Re: Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 175)
|
|
|
|
178
|
Re: Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 178)
|
Re: Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 177)
|
|
|
|
179
|
Re: logical fallacy then topic (Message 179)
|
Re: logical fallacy then topic (Message 176)
By RAZD
09-09-2006 9:11 PM |
|
|
|
180
|
Message 180
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
Re: Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 181)
|
Re: Challenge, who's up for it? (Message 178)
|
|
|
|
182
|
yes or no? (Message 182)
By RAZD
09-09-2006 10:13 PM |
Message 180
|
|
|
|
183
|
Re: yes or no? (Message 183)
|
yes or no? (Message 182)
By RAZD
09-09-2006 10:13 PM |
|
|
|
184
|
Re: yes or no? (Message 184)
|
Re: yes or no? (Message 183)
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
