|
Msg Num
|
Message Details
|
Reply To
|
Replies
|
|
1
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
2
|
Message 2
By Admin
03-07-2009 2:22 PM
|
|
|
|
3
|
Creationists (Message 3)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 2:59 PM
|
Message 1
|
|
|
4
|
Message 4
|
|
|
|
5
|
Re: Creationists (Message 5)
|
Creationists (Message 3)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 2:59 PM
|
|
|
6
|
Re: Creationists (Message 6)
|
Creationists (Message 3)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 2:59 PM
|
|
|
7
|
Re: Creationists (Message 7)
|
Creationists (Message 3)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 2:59 PM
|
|
|
8
|
Re: Creationists (Message 8)
By JonF
03-07-2009 3:40 PM
|
Creationists (Message 3)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 2:59 PM
|
|
|
9
|
Re: Creationists (Message 9)
|
Creationists (Message 3)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 2:59 PM
|
|
|
10
|
still not getting it... (Message 10)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 3:55 PM
|
Message 4
|
|
|
11
|
It is ridiculous to try and limit this discussion (Message 11)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:02 PM
|
Re: Creationists (Message 6)
|
|
|
12
|
This is so exhausting (Message 12)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:07 PM
|
Re: Creationists (Message 7)
|
|
|
13
|
This is false (Message 13)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:11 PM
|
Re: Creationists (Message 8)
By JonF
03-07-2009 3:40 PM
|
|
|
14
|
Oh please.. (Message 14)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:14 PM
|
Re: Creationists (Message 9)
|
|
|
15
|
Re: This is so exhausting (Message 15)
|
This is so exhausting (Message 12)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:07 PM
|
|
|
16
|
Re: It is ridiculous to try and limit this discussion (Message 16)
|
It is ridiculous to try and limit this discussion (Message 11)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:02 PM
|
|
|
17
|
What planet are you talking about? (Message 17)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:24 PM
|
Re: This is so exhausting (Message 15)
|
|
|
18
|
Re: Oh please.. (Message 18)
|
Oh please.. (Message 14)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:14 PM
|
|
|
19
|
No, Your Not , Are You (Message 19)
|
still not getting it... (Message 10)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 3:55 PM
|
|
|
20
|
Re: What planet are you talking about? (Message 20)
|
What planet are you talking about? (Message 17)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:24 PM
|
|
|
21
|
Re: What planet are you talking about? (Message 21)
By Admin
03-07-2009 5:23 PM
|
What planet are you talking about? (Message 17)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:24 PM
|
|
|
22
|
Re: This is false (Message 22)
By JonF
03-07-2009 7:50 PM
|
This is false (Message 13)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:11 PM
|
|
|
23
|
Re: still not getting it... (Message 23)
|
still not getting it... (Message 10)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 3:55 PM
|
|
|
24
|
Re: Oh please.. (Message 24)
By JonF
03-07-2009 8:10 PM
|
Oh please.. (Message 14)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:14 PM
|
|
|
25
|
Smoke and Mirrors (Message 25)
|
|
|
|
26
|
Re: This is so exhausting (Message 26)
|
This is so exhausting (Message 12)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:07 PM
|
|
|
27
|
Re: This is so exhausting (Message 27)
|
Re: This is so exhausting (Message 26)
|
|
|
28
|
Morris and Creation Science (Message 28)
|
|
|
|
29
|
Re: still not getting it... (Message 29)
By rueh
03-08-2009 11:29 AM
|
Re: still not getting it... (Message 23)
|
|
|
30
|
Taken them to the cleaners (Message 30)
|
Morris and Creation Science (Message 28)
|
|
|
31
|
Message 31
|
|
|
|
32
|
Lol, seriously. (Message 32)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 3:21 PM
|
Re: What planet are you talking about? (Message 21)
By Admin
03-07-2009 5:23 PM
|
|
|
33
|
Answers (Message 33)
|
Lol, seriously. (Message 32)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 3:21 PM
|
|
|
34
|
The point of my list (Message 34)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 4:15 PM
|
Message 31
|
|
|
35
|
Taking Time (Message 35)
|
Lol, seriously. (Message 32)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 3:21 PM
|
|
|
36
|
Re: The point of my list (Message 36)
|
The point of my list (Message 34)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 4:15 PM
|
|
|
37
|
Re: The point of my list (Message 37)
|
The point of my list (Message 34)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 4:15 PM
|
|
|
38
|
Re: Lol, seriously. (Message 38)
By Admin
03-08-2009 6:35 PM
|
Lol, seriously. (Message 32)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 3:21 PM
|
|
|
39
|
I think it makes sense (Message 39)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 8:37 PM
|
Re: The point of my list (Message 37)
|
|
|
40
|
Re: I think it makes sense (Message 40)
By ICANT
03-08-2009 8:47 PM
|
I think it makes sense (Message 39)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 8:37 PM
|
|
|
41
|
defining terms (Message 41)
|
Re: I think it makes sense (Message 40)
By ICANT
03-08-2009 8:47 PM
|
|
|
42
|
Re: defining terms (Message 42)
By ICANT
03-08-2009 10:05 PM
|
defining terms (Message 41)
|
|
|
43
|
Re: I think it makes sense (Message 43)
|
I think it makes sense (Message 39)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 8:37 PM
|
|
|
44
|
Re: Lol, seriously. (Message 44)
|
Lol, seriously. (Message 32)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 3:21 PM
|
|
|
45
|
Re: I think it makes sense (Message 45)
|
Re: I think it makes sense (Message 43)
|
|
|
46
|
Re: I think it makes sense (Message 46)
|
I think it makes sense (Message 39)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 8:37 PM
|
|
|
47
|
Re: I think it makes sense (Message 47)
|
I think it makes sense (Message 39)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 8:37 PM
|
|
|
48
|
Creatioists are not trying to prove or even figure out (Message 48)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 9:13 AM
|
Re: I think it makes sense (Message 46)
|
|
|
49
|
Message 49
|
|
|
|
50
|
Do you think that evolutionists are any different? (Message 50)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 9:57 AM
|
Re: The point of my list (Message 36)
|
|
|
51
|
Re: Creatioists are not trying to prove or even figure out (Message 51)
By Percy
03-09-2009 10:02 AM
|
Creatioists are not trying to prove or even figure out (Message 48)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 9:13 AM
|
|
|
52
|
Re: Do you think that evolutionists are any different? (Message 52)
By Percy
03-09-2009 10:10 AM
|
Do you think that evolutionists are any different? (Message 50)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 9:57 AM
|
|
|
53
|
Re: Creatioists are not trying to prove or even figure out (Message 53)
|
Creatioists are not trying to prove or even figure out (Message 48)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 9:13 AM
|
|
|
54
|
In spite of the discrimination against creation scientists (Message 54)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 10:29 AM
|
Re: It is ridiculous to try and limit this discussion (Message 16)
|
|
|
55
|
Re: In spite of the discrimination against creation scientists (Message 55)
By Percy
03-09-2009 10:32 AM
|
In spite of the discrimination against creation scientists (Message 54)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 10:29 AM
|
|
|
56
|
Re: Do you think that evolutionists are any different? (Message 56)
|
Do you think that evolutionists are any different? (Message 50)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 9:57 AM
|
|
|
57
|
I am interested only in first showing (Message 57)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 10:50 AM
|
Re: In spite of the discrimination against creation scientists (Message 55)
By Percy
03-09-2009 10:32 AM
|
|
|
58
|
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 58)
|
I am interested only in first showing (Message 57)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 10:50 AM
|
|
|
59
|
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 59)
|
I am interested only in first showing (Message 57)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 10:50 AM
|
|
|
60
|
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 60)
By Percy
03-09-2009 11:20 AM
|
I am interested only in first showing (Message 57)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 10:50 AM
|
|
|
61
|
Radiocarbon dating (Message 61)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 11:39 AM
|
Re: Do you think that evolutionists are any different? (Message 56)
|
|
|
62
|
Re: Radiocarbon dating (Message 62)
|
Radiocarbon dating (Message 61)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 11:39 AM
|
|
|
63
|
Re: Radiocarbon dating (Message 63)
By Dman
03-09-2009 12:00 PM
|
Radiocarbon dating (Message 61)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 11:39 AM
|
|
|
64
|
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 64)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:00 PM
|
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 59)
|
|
|
65
|
Re: Radiocarbon dating (Message 65)
By Percy
03-09-2009 12:08 PM
|
Radiocarbon dating (Message 61)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 11:39 AM
|
|
|
66
|
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 66)
|
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 64)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:00 PM
|
|
|
67
|
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 67)
|
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 64)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:00 PM
|
|
|
68
|
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 68)
|
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 64)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:00 PM
|
|
|
69
|
I am sorry (Message 69)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:58 PM
|
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 67)
|
|
|
70
|
extinct species (Message 70)
|
|
|
|
71
|
A plague on both your houses! (Message 71)
|
I am sorry (Message 69)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:58 PM
|
|
|
72
|
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 72)
|
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 64)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:00 PM
|
|
|
73
|
Re: I am sorry (Message 73)
|
I am sorry (Message 69)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:58 PM
|
|
|
74
|
Re: I am sorry (Message 74)
By Percy
03-09-2009 1:30 PM
|
I am sorry (Message 69)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:58 PM
|
|
|
75
|
Very good Modulous (Message 75)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 1:33 PM
|
A plague on both your houses! (Message 71)
|
|
|
76
|
Re: I am sorry (Message 76)
|
I am sorry (Message 69)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:58 PM
|
|
|
77
|
Re: Very good Modulous (Message 77)
|
Very good Modulous (Message 75)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 1:33 PM
|
|
|
78
|
Thanks Percy (Message 78)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 2:00 PM
|
Re: I am sorry (Message 74)
By Percy
03-09-2009 1:30 PM
|
|
|
79
|
Re: Very good Modulous (Message 79)
|
Very good Modulous (Message 75)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 1:33 PM
|
|
|
80
|
Re: Thanks Percy (Message 80)
|
Thanks Percy (Message 78)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 2:00 PM
|
|
|
81
|
If you say so, Modulous (Message 81)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 2:31 PM
|
Re: Very good Modulous (Message 79)
|
|
|
82
|
Re: Thanks Percy (Message 82)
|
Thanks Percy (Message 78)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 2:00 PM
|
|
|
83
|
Re: If you say so, Modulous (Message 83)
|
If you say so, Modulous (Message 81)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 2:31 PM
|
|
|
84
|
Re: If you say so, Modulous (Message 84)
|
If you say so, Modulous (Message 81)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 2:31 PM
|
|
|
85
|
Re: Thanks Percy (Message 85)
By Percy
03-09-2009 3:09 PM
|
Thanks Percy (Message 78)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 2:00 PM
|
|
|
86
|
Re: Radiocarbon dating (Message 86)
|
Radiocarbon dating (Message 61)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 11:39 AM
|
|
|
87
|
A mark for creation science.. (Message 87)
|
Radiocarbon dating (Message 61)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 11:39 AM
|
|
|
88
|
misrepresentation (Message 88)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 5:35 PM
|
Re: If you say so, Modulous (Message 83)
|
|
|
89
|
Re: Thanks Percy (Message 89)
|
Re: Thanks Percy (Message 85)
By Percy
03-09-2009 3:09 PM
|
|
|
90
|
Simplton Representation (Message 90)
|
misrepresentation (Message 88)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 5:35 PM
|
|
|
91
|
No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 91)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 6:35 PM
|
Re: Thanks Percy (Message 85)
By Percy
03-09-2009 3:09 PM
|
|
|
92
|
Re: No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 92)
|
No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 91)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 6:35 PM
|
|
|
93
|
Re: No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 93)
By Percy
03-09-2009 8:31 PM
|
No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 91)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 6:35 PM
|
|
|
94
|
Re: Very good Modulous (Message 94)
By Taq
03-09-2009 9:08 PM
|
Very good Modulous (Message 75)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 1:33 PM
|
|
|
95
|
Re: misrepresentation (Message 95)
|
misrepresentation (Message 88)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 5:35 PM
|
|
|
96
|
Re: misrepresentation (Message 96)
|
misrepresentation (Message 88)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 5:35 PM
|
|
|
97
|
Re: Very good Modulous (Message 97)
|
Re: Very good Modulous (Message 94)
By Taq
03-09-2009 9:08 PM
|
|
|
98
|
Re: Very good Modulous (Message 98)
By Taq
03-09-2009 9:29 PM
|
Re: Very good Modulous (Message 97)
|
|
|
99
|
Message 99
|
|
|
|
100
|
"A process was involved!" (Message 100)
|
Creatioists are not trying to prove or even figure out (Message 48)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 9:13 AM
|
|
|
101
|
Re: No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 101)
|
No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 91)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 6:35 PM
|
|
|
102
|
Re: misrepresentation (Message 102)
|
misrepresentation (Message 88)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 5:35 PM
|
|
|
103
|
I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 103)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 8:52 AM
|
Re: misrepresentation (Message 96)
|
|
|
104
|
To be a misconception it has to be wrong (Message 104)
|
I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 103)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 8:52 AM
|
|
|
105
|
Science is more than pointing at evidence and saying "See?" (Message 105)
|
I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 103)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 8:52 AM
|
|
|
106
|
Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 106)
By Percy
03-10-2009 9:16 AM
|
|
|
|
107
|
Re: "A process was involved!" (Message 107)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 9:38 AM
|
"A process was involved!" (Message 100)
|
|
|
108
|
Re: I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 108)
By Larni
03-10-2009 9:40 AM
|
I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 103)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 8:52 AM
|
|
|
109
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 109)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 10:01 AM
|
Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 106)
By Percy
03-10-2009 9:16 AM
|
|
|
110
|
Not ignoring anything Percy, (Message 110)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 10:34 AM
|
Re: No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 93)
By Percy
03-09-2009 8:31 PM
|
|
|
111
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 111)
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 109)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 10:01 AM
|
|
|
112
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 112)
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 109)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 10:01 AM
|
|
|
113
|
In the Beginning... (Message 113)
|
Re: "A process was involved!" (Message 107)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 9:38 AM
|
|
|
114
|
This is all arguable, debatable (Message 114)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 11:01 AM
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 112)
|
|
|
115
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 115)
|
Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 106)
By Percy
03-10-2009 9:16 AM
|
|
|
116
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 116)
By Stile
03-10-2009 11:30 AM
|
Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 106)
By Percy
03-10-2009 9:16 AM
|
|
|
117
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 117)
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 116)
By Stile
03-10-2009 11:30 AM
|
|
|
118
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 118)
By Stile
03-10-2009 12:01 PM
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 117)
|
|
|
119
|
Re: Not ignoring anything Percy, (Message 119)
|
Not ignoring anything Percy, (Message 110)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 10:34 AM
|
|
|
120
|
You continue to use arguments you have been shown to be false (Message 120)
|
misrepresentation (Message 88)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 5:35 PM
|
|
|
121
|
Re: LIAR (Message 121)
|
You continue to use arguments you have been shown to be false (Message 120)
|
|
|
122
|
Re: LIAR (Message 122)
|
Re: LIAR (Message 121)
|
|
|
123
|
Re: LIAR (Message 123)
|
Re: LIAR (Message 122)
|
|
|
124
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 124)
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 109)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 10:01 AM
|
|
|
125
|
Re: LIAR (Message 125)
|
Re: LIAR (Message 122)
|
|
|
126
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 126)
By Percy
03-10-2009 1:55 PM
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 115)
|
|
|
127
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 127)
By Percy
03-10-2009 2:05 PM
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 116)
By Stile
03-10-2009 11:30 AM
|
|
|
128
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 128)
By Stile
03-10-2009 2:18 PM
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 127)
By Percy
03-10-2009 2:05 PM
|
|
|
129
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 129)
By Percy
03-10-2009 2:21 PM
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 124)
|
|
|
130
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 130)
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 129)
By Percy
03-10-2009 2:21 PM
|
|
|
131
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 131)
By Percy
03-10-2009 3:34 PM
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 130)
|
|
|
132
|
Re: I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 132)
|
I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 103)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 8:52 AM
|
|
|
133
|
Re: Not ignoring anything Percy, (Message 133)
|
Not ignoring anything Percy, (Message 110)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 10:34 AM
|
|
|
134
|
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 134)
By Taq
03-10-2009 6:04 PM
|
This is all arguable, debatable (Message 114)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 11:01 AM
|
|
|
135
|
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 135)
|
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 134)
By Taq
03-10-2009 6:04 PM
|
|
|
136
|
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 136)
|
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 135)
|
|
|
137
|
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 137)
|
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 136)
|
|
|
138
|
Re: I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 138)
|
I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 103)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 8:52 AM
|
|
|
139
|
Re: "A process was involved!" (Message 139)
|
Re: "A process was involved!" (Message 107)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 9:38 AM
|
|
|
140
|
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 140)
|
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 136)
|
|
|
141
|
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 141)
By Son
03-11-2009 6:13 AM
|
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 140)
|
|
|
142
|
AMA Approved (Message 142)
|
Re: I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 138)
|
|
|
143
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 143)
By Percy
03-11-2009 8:40 AM
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 130)
|
|
|
144
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 144)
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 143)
By Percy
03-11-2009 8:40 AM
|
|
|
145
|
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 145)
|
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 141)
By Son
03-11-2009 6:13 AM
|
|
|
146
|
Is it Science? (Message 146)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 9:49 AM
|
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 143)
By Percy
03-11-2009 8:40 AM
|
|
|
147
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 147)
By Percy
03-11-2009 9:58 AM
|
Is it Science? (Message 146)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 9:49 AM
|
|
|
148
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 148)
|
Is it Science? (Message 146)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 9:49 AM
|
|
|
149
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 149)
By Son
03-11-2009 10:11 AM
|
Is it Science? (Message 146)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 9:49 AM
|
|
|
150
|
Creation Science (Message 150)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:17 AM
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 148)
|
|
|
151
|
Re: Creation Science (Message 151)
By Son
03-11-2009 10:25 AM
|
Creation Science (Message 150)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:17 AM
|
|
|
152
|
Comparing the two Models (Message 152)
By Stile
03-11-2009 10:30 AM
|
Is it Science? (Message 146)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 9:49 AM
|
|
|
153
|
Creastion Science -- details (Message 153)
|
Creation Science (Message 150)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:17 AM
|
|
|
154
|
Is it Science? (Message 154)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:36 AM
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 149)
By Son
03-11-2009 10:11 AM
|
|
|
155
|
Re: Creation Science (Message 155)
|
Creation Science (Message 150)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:17 AM
|
|
|
156
|
Re: Creastion Science -- details (Message 156)
By ICANT
03-11-2009 10:46 AM
|
Creastion Science -- details (Message 153)
|
|
|
157
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 157)
|
Is it Science? (Message 154)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:36 AM
|
|
|
158
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 158)
By Stile
03-11-2009 10:58 AM
|
Is it Science? (Message 154)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:36 AM
|
|
|
159
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 159)
By ICANT
03-11-2009 11:46 AM
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 158)
By Stile
03-11-2009 10:58 AM
|
|
|
160
|
Re: Creation Science (Message 160)
|
Creation Science (Message 150)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:17 AM
|
|
|
161
|
Re: Creation Science (Message 161)
By Dman
03-11-2009 12:02 PM
|
Creation Science (Message 150)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:17 AM
|
|
|
162
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 162)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:08 PM
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 158)
By Stile
03-11-2009 10:58 AM
|
|
|
163
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 163)
By Stile
03-11-2009 12:09 PM
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 159)
By ICANT
03-11-2009 11:46 AM
|
|
|
164
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 164)
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 159)
By ICANT
03-11-2009 11:46 AM
|
|
|
165
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 165)
|
Is it Science? (Message 154)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:36 AM
|
|
|
166
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 166)
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 162)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:08 PM
|
|
|
167
|
That's a good question (Message 167)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:27 PM
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 165)
|
|
|
168
|
Very Nice! (Message 168)
By Stile
03-11-2009 12:28 PM
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 162)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:08 PM
|
|
|
169
|
Re: That's a good question (Message 169)
|
That's a good question (Message 167)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:27 PM
|
|
|
170
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 170)
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 159)
By ICANT
03-11-2009 11:46 AM
|
|
|
171
|
lol! nice artistict rendition (Message 171)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:06 PM
|
Very Nice! (Message 168)
By Stile
03-11-2009 12:28 PM
|
|
|
172
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 172)
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 162)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:08 PM
|
|
|
173
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 173)
By Taq
03-11-2009 1:13 PM
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 162)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:08 PM
|
|
|
174
|
Re: lol! nice artistict rendition (Message 174)
|
lol! nice artistict rendition (Message 171)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:06 PM
|
|
|
175
|
Nice arrangement (Message 175)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:29 PM
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 172)
|
|
|
176
|
back to the topic (Message 176)
By Son
03-11-2009 1:33 PM
|
|
|
|
177
|
I've had enough witnessing (Message 177)
|
Nice arrangement (Message 175)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:29 PM
|
|
|
178
|
Re: Nice arrangement (Message 178)
By Son
03-11-2009 1:37 PM
|
Nice arrangement (Message 175)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:29 PM
|
|
|
179
|
Re: That's a good question (Message 179)
|
That's a good question (Message 167)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:27 PM
|
|
|
180
|
Re: Nice arrangement (Message 180)
|
Re: Nice arrangement (Message 178)
By Son
03-11-2009 1:37 PM
|
|
|
181
|
What happened to honesty? (Message 181)
By Stile
03-11-2009 1:47 PM
|
lol! nice artistict rendition (Message 171)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:06 PM
|
|
|
182
|
Re: back to the topic (Message 182)
By Stile
03-11-2009 1:55 PM
|
back to the topic (Message 176)
By Son
03-11-2009 1:33 PM
|
|
|
183
|
Reiteration of site rules. (Message 183)
|
lol! nice artistict rendition (Message 171)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:06 PM
|
|
|
184
|
copyright (Message 184)
|
What happened to honesty? (Message 181)
By Stile
03-11-2009 1:47 PM
|
|
|
185
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 185)
|
Is it Science? (Message 146)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 9:49 AM
|
|
|
186
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 186)
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 162)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:08 PM
|
|
|
187
|
Re: Nice arrangement (Message 187)
|
Nice arrangement (Message 175)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:29 PM
|
|
|
188
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 188)
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 162)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:08 PM
|
|
|
189
|
Re: Nice arrangement (Message 189)
By Taq
03-11-2009 4:25 PM
|
Nice arrangement (Message 175)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:29 PM
|
|
|
190
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 190)
By ICANT
03-11-2009 4:35 PM
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 163)
By Stile
03-11-2009 12:09 PM
|
|
|
191
|
Two things... (Message 191)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 4:41 PM
|
Reiteration of site rules. (Message 183)
|
|
|
192
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 192)
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 190)
By ICANT
03-11-2009 4:35 PM
|
|
|
193
|
No need to go on.. (Message 193)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 5:03 PM
|
Re: Nice arrangement (Message 189)
By Taq
03-11-2009 4:25 PM
|
|
|
194
|
Re: Two things... (Message 194)
|
Two things... (Message 191)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 4:41 PM
|
|
|
195
|
Re: No need to go on.. (Message 195)
|
No need to go on.. (Message 193)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 5:03 PM
|
|
|
196
|
Suspensions will follow this message (Message 196)
|
|
|
|
197
|
Thanks Modulous (Message 197)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 5:21 PM
|
Re: Two things... (Message 194)
|
|
|
198
|
Re: Thanks Modulous (Message 198)
|
Thanks Modulous (Message 197)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 5:21 PM
|
|
|
199
|
Re: No need to go on.. (Message 199)
By Taq
03-11-2009 5:30 PM
|
No need to go on.. (Message 193)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 5:03 PM
|
|
|
200
|
Re: Thanks Modulous (Message 200)
By Taq
03-11-2009 6:03 PM
|
Thanks Modulous (Message 197)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 5:21 PM
|
|
|
201
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 201)
By Taq
03-11-2009 6:07 PM
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 190)
By ICANT
03-11-2009 4:35 PM
|
|
|
202
|
bingo! (Message 202)
|
Re: No need to go on.. (Message 199)
By Taq
03-11-2009 5:30 PM
|
|
|
203
|
When it comes to historical science (Message 203)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 6:44 PM
|
Re: Is it Science? (Message 201)
By Taq
03-11-2009 6:07 PM
|
|
|
204
|
Re: When it comes to historical science (Message 204)
|
When it comes to historical science (Message 203)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 6:44 PM
|
|
|
205
|
Re: When it comes to historical science (Message 205)
By Taq
03-11-2009 6:57 PM
|
When it comes to historical science (Message 203)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 6:44 PM
|
|
|
206
|
Re: When it comes to historical science (Message 206)
|
When it comes to historical science (Message 203)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 6:44 PM
|
|
|
207
|
Message 207
|
|
|