|
|
Msg
Num
|
Message Details
|
Reply To
|
Replies
|
|
1
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
Message 2
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
3
|
Message 3
|
Message 2
|
|
|
|
4
|
Science is not "efficient" (Message 4)
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Message 5
|
Message 3
|
|
|
|
6
|
The SSC (Message 6)
|
Message 5
|
|
|
|
7
|
Message 7
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
8
|
POTM time (Message 8)
|
Message 7
|
|
|
|
9
|
Re: The SSC (Message 9)
|
The SSC (Message 6)
|
|
|
|
10
|
Re: The SSC (Message 10)
|
Re: The SSC (Message 9)
|
|
|
|
11
|
Spend the money on core need projects, not something way off on the fringe (Message 11)
|
Message 7
|
|
|
|
12
|
frontiers (Message 12)
|
Spend the money on core need projects, not something way off on the fringe (Message 11)
|
|
|
|
13
|
Fund me! (Message 13)
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
14
|
Government "pork" spending in the name of science (Message 14)
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
Re: Fund me! (Message 15)
|
Fund me! (Message 13)
|
|
|
|
16
|
Re: Fund me! (Message 16)
|
Re: Fund me! (Message 15)
|
|
|
|
17
|
Re: Government "pork" spending in the name of science (Message 17)
|
Government "pork" spending in the name of science (Message 14)
|
|
|
|
18
|
Re: Fund me! (Message 18)
|
Re: Fund me! (Message 15)
|
|
|
|
19
|
Re: Government "pork" spending in the name of science (Message 19)
|
Re: Government "pork" spending in the name of science (Message 17)
|
|
|
|
20
|
Re: Government "pork" spending in the name of science (Message 20)
|
Re: Government "pork" spending in the name of science (Message 19)
|
|
|
|
21
|
Hubble, but not SSC? (Message 21)
|
Re: Government "pork" spending in the name of science (Message 19)
|
|
|
|
22
|
Message 22
|
Message 5
|
|
|
|
23
|
Message 23
|
Message 22
|
|
|
|
24
|
reconsidering (Message 24)
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 25)
|
reconsidering (Message 24)
|
|
|
|
26
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 26)
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 25)
|
|
|
|
27
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 27)
|
reconsidering (Message 24)
|
|
|
|
28
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 28)
By nwr
04-01-2006 11:15 AM |
Re: reconsidering (Message 26)
|
|
|
|
29
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 29)
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 27)
|
|
|
|
30
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 30)
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 26)
|
|
|
|
31
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 31)
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 29)
|
|
|
|
32
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 32)
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 31)
|
|
|
|
33
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 33)
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 32)
|
|
|
|
34
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 34)
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 33)
|
|
|
|
35
|
first draft summary (Message 35)
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 30)
|
|
|
|
36
|
Re: first draft summary (Message 36)
|
first draft summary (Message 35)
|
|
|
|
37
|
Not a matter of broad understanding, rather a mater of practical benefit (Message 37)
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 31)
|
|
|
|
38
|
Re: Not a matter of broad understanding, rather a mater of practical benefit (Message 38)
|
Not a matter of broad understanding, rather a mater of practical benefit (Message 37)
|
|
|
|
39
|
Re: first draft summary (Message 39)
|
first draft summary (Message 35)
|
|
|
|
40
|
Re: Not a matter of broad understanding, rather a mater of practical benefit (Message 40)
|
Not a matter of broad understanding, rather a mater of practical benefit (Message 37)
|
|
|
|
41
|
Message 41
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
Bump for fgarb (Message 42)
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
funding by understanding (Message 43)
|
Re: reconsidering (Message 31)
|
|
|
|
44
|
Re: Bump for fgarb (Message 44)
|
Bump for fgarb (Message 42)
|
|
|
|
45
|
The Bayh-Dole act. (Message 45)
|
Fund me! (Message 13)
|
|
|
|
46
|
Re: The Bayh-Dole act. (Message 46)
|
The Bayh-Dole act. (Message 45)
|
|
|
|
47
|
per your advice (Message 47)
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
Re: per your advice (Message 48)
|
per your advice (Message 47)
|
|
|
|
49
|
Re: per your advice (Message 49)
By Taq
12-03-2010 11:56 AM |
per your advice (Message 47)
|
|
|
|
50
|
Re: per your advice (Message 50)
|
Re: per your advice (Message 49)
By Taq
12-03-2010 11:56 AM |
|
|
|
51
|
Re: per your advice (Message 51)
|
Re: per your advice (Message 50)
|
|
|
|
52
|
Re: per your advice (Message 52)
By Taq
12-03-2010 12:54 PM |
Re: per your advice (Message 50)
|
|
|
|
53
|
Message 53
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
54
|
Re: per your advice (Message 54)
|
Re: per your advice (Message 50)
|
|
|
|
55
|
Message 55
By frako
12-03-2010 2:46 PM |
Message 53
|
|
|
|
56
|
Message 56
|
Message 55
By frako
12-03-2010 2:46 PM |
|
|
|
57
|
Message 57
By frako
12-03-2010 3:15 PM |
Message 56
|
|
|
|
58
|
Message 58
|
Message 57
By frako
12-03-2010 3:15 PM |
|
|
|
59
|
Message 59
By frako
12-03-2010 3:33 PM |
Message 58
|
|
|
|
60
|
Message 60
|
Message 59
By frako
12-03-2010 3:33 PM |
|
|
|
61
|
Re: per your advice (Message 61)
|
per your advice (Message 47)
|
|
|
|
62
|
Message 62
By frako
12-03-2010 3:58 PM |
Message 60
|
|
|
|
63
|
Message 63
By frako
12-04-2010 7:50 AM |
|
|
|
|
64
|
Regardless of things elsewhere, science shouldn't be a sacred cow (Message 64)
|
Re: per your advice (Message 52)
By Taq
12-03-2010 12:54 PM |
|
|
|
65
|
Re: Regardless of things elsewhere, science shouldn't be a sacred cow (Message 65)
|
Regardless of things elsewhere, science shouldn't be a sacred cow (Message 64)
|
|
|
|
66
|
Re: per your advice (Message 66)
By Son
12-05-2010 10:58 AM |
Re: per your advice (Message 50)
|
|
|
|
67
|
Re: per your advice (Message 67)
By frako
12-05-2010 11:17 AM |
Re: per your advice (Message 66)
By Son
12-05-2010 10:58 AM |
|
|
|
68
|
Message 68
|
Message 60
|
|
|
|
69
|
Message 69
|
Message 68
|
|
|
|
70
|
Re: Regardless of things elsewhere, science shouldn't be a sacred cow (Message 70)
By Taq
12-06-2010 1:26 PM |
Regardless of things elsewhere, science shouldn't be a sacred cow (Message 64)
|
|
|
|
71
|
Defund science? (Message 71)
|
|
|
|
72
|
Re: Regardless of things elsewhere, science shouldn't be a sacred cow (Message 72)
|
Re: Regardless of things elsewhere, science shouldn't be a sacred cow (Message 65)
|
|
|
|
73
|
Message 73
|
Message 68
|
|
|
|
74
|
Message 74
|
Message 69
|
|
™ Version 4.2
