|
Msg Num
|
Message Details
|
Reply To
|
Replies
|
|
1
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
2
|
Message 2
|
Message 1
|
|
|
3
|
Message 3
|
Message 2
|
|
|
4
|
Message 4
|
Message 3
|
|
|
5
|
Message 5
|
Message 4
|
|
|
6
|
Message 6
|
Message 5
|
|
|
7
|
irony. (Message 7)
|
Message 4
|
|
|
8
|
Message 8
|
Message 3
|
|
|
9
|
Message 9
|
irony. (Message 7)
|
|
|
10
|
Message 10
|
Message 9
|
|
|
11
|
Message 11
|
Message 10
|
|
|
12
|
Message 12
|
Message 11
|
|
|
13
|
Message 13
|
Message 12
|
|
|
14
|
Message 14
|
|
|
|
15
|
irony part two (Message 15)
|
Message 13
|
|
|
16
|
Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 16)
By Phat
05-20-2005 8:04 AM
|
Message 13
|
|
|
17
|
Re: Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 17)
|
Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 16)
By Phat
05-20-2005 8:04 AM
|
|
|
18
|
Re: Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 18)
|
Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 16)
By Phat
05-20-2005 8:04 AM
|
|
|
19
|
Re: Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 19)
By Phat
05-20-2005 12:37 PM
|
Re: Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 18)
|
|
|
20
|
Re: Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 20)
|
Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 16)
By Phat
05-20-2005 8:04 AM
|
|
|
21
|
Re: Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 21)
|
Re: Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 18)
|
|
|
22
|
The Senate is not Congress (Message 22)
|
Message 3
|
|
|
23
|
Re: Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 23)
|
Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 16)
By Phat
05-20-2005 8:04 AM
|
|
|
24
|
Re: Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 24)
By Phat
05-20-2005 4:38 PM
|
Re: Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 23)
|
|
|
25
|
Re: The Senate is not Congress (Message 25)
|
The Senate is not Congress (Message 22)
|
|
|
26
|
Re: Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 26)
|
Re: Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 24)
By Phat
05-20-2005 4:38 PM
|
|
|
27
|
Now that the Republicans have their moment in the sun, they can't get any ... (Message 27)
By jar
05-20-2005 9:08 PM
|
Re: Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 24)
By Phat
05-20-2005 4:38 PM
|
|
|
28
|
We trust the ACLJ why, precisely? (Message 28)
|
Re: Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 24)
By Phat
05-20-2005 4:38 PM
|
|
|
29
|
Re: Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 29)
|
Re: Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 24)
By Phat
05-20-2005 4:38 PM
|
|
|
30
|
Re: Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 30)
By Phat
05-21-2005 11:54 AM
|
Re: Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 29)
|
|
|
31
|
If it's fixed, why is it relative? (Message 31)
|
Re: Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 30)
By Phat
05-21-2005 11:54 AM
|
|
|
32
|
Petition! (Message 32)
|
|
|
|
33
|
Re: Petition! (Message 33)
By Tal
05-23-2005 2:02 PM
|
Petition! (Message 32)
|
|
|
34
|
Re: Petition! (Message 34)
|
Re: Petition! (Message 33)
By Tal
05-23-2005 2:02 PM
|
|
|
35
|
Message 35
By sfs
05-23-2005 3:02 PM
|
Message 5
|
|
|
36
|
Re: Petition! (Message 36)
By sfs
05-23-2005 3:09 PM
|
Re: Petition! (Message 34)
|
|
|
37
|
Re: Petition! (Message 37)
|
Re: Petition! (Message 33)
By Tal
05-23-2005 2:02 PM
|
|
|
38
|
The biggest threat to our liberty (Message 38)
By jar
05-23-2005 3:41 PM
|
Re: Petition! (Message 37)
|
|
|
39
|
Re: Petition! (Message 39)
By Tal
05-23-2005 3:46 PM
|
Re: Petition! (Message 37)
|
|
|
40
|
Message 40
|
Supermajority is un=necessary (Message 16)
By Phat
05-20-2005 8:04 AM
|
|
|
41
|
Message 41
|
Re: Petition! (Message 33)
By Tal
05-23-2005 2:02 PM
|
|
|
42
|
James dobson (Message 42)
By Phat
05-23-2005 6:33 PM
|
Message 41
|
|
|
43
|
For just $3.25US you too (Message 43)
By jar
05-23-2005 7:19 PM
|
James dobson (Message 42)
By Phat
05-23-2005 6:33 PM
|
|
|
44
|
Re: For just $3.25US you too (Message 44)
|
For just $3.25US you too (Message 43)
By jar
05-23-2005 7:19 PM
|
|
|
45
|
What about this new agreement? (Message 45)
|
|
|
|
46
|
Re: What about this new agreement? (Message 46)
|
What about this new agreement? (Message 45)
|
|
|
47
|
Re: What about this new agreement? (Message 47)
By Phat
05-24-2005 7:10 AM
|
What about this new agreement? (Message 45)
|
|
|
48
|
Re: What about this new agreement? (Message 48)
By Tal
05-24-2005 2:03 PM
|
Re: What about this new agreement? (Message 47)
By Phat
05-24-2005 7:10 AM
|
|
|
49
|
Message 49
|
Message 8
|
|
|
50
|
silly (Message 50)
By nator
05-25-2005 8:13 AM
|
Message 49
|
|
|
51
|
Re: What about this new agreement? (Message 51)
By nator
05-25-2005 8:17 AM
|
Re: What about this new agreement? (Message 46)
|
|
|
52
|
Republican compromise (Message 52)
By Monk
05-25-2005 8:37 AM
|
Re: What about this new agreement? (Message 51)
By nator
05-25-2005 8:17 AM
|
|
|
53
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 53)
|
Republican compromise (Message 52)
By Monk
05-25-2005 8:37 AM
|
|
|
54
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 54)
By Monk
05-25-2005 10:31 AM
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 53)
|
|
|
55
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 55)
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 54)
By Monk
05-25-2005 10:31 AM
|
|
|
56
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 56)
By Monk
05-25-2005 11:41 AM
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 55)
|
|
|
57
|
Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 57)
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 54)
By Monk
05-25-2005 10:31 AM
|
|
|
58
|
Chicken little Democrats (Message 58)
By Monk
05-25-2005 12:57 PM
|
Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 57)
|
|
|
59
|
Re: Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 59)
By Tal
05-25-2005 1:27 PM
|
Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 57)
|
|
|
60
|
Re: Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 60)
|
Re: Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 59)
By Tal
05-25-2005 1:27 PM
|
|
|
61
|
Re: Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 61)
|
Re: Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 59)
By Tal
05-25-2005 1:27 PM
|
|
|
62
|
Message 62
|
Chicken little Democrats (Message 58)
By Monk
05-25-2005 12:57 PM
|
|
|
63
|
Re: Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 63)
|
Re: Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 59)
By Tal
05-25-2005 1:27 PM
|
|
|
64
|
Message 64
By Monk
05-25-2005 3:02 PM
|
Message 62
|
|
|
65
|
Re: Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 65)
By Tal
05-25-2005 3:13 PM
|
Re: Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 63)
|
|
|
66
|
Re: Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 66)
By Tal
05-25-2005 3:13 PM
|
Re: Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 63)
|
|
|
67
|
Re: Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 67)
|
Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 57)
|
|
|
68
|
Rights lost since 9/11 (Message 68)
|
Re: Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 59)
By Tal
05-25-2005 1:27 PM
|
|
|
69
|
Re: Petition! (Message 69)
|
Re: Petition! (Message 36)
By sfs
05-23-2005 3:09 PM
|
|
|
70
|
Message 70
|
Message 64
By Monk
05-25-2005 3:02 PM
|
|
|
71
|
the key point here (Message 71)
|
Message 40
|
|
|
72
|
Re: Rights lost since 9/11 (Message 72)
By Tal
05-25-2005 3:46 PM
|
Rights lost since 9/11 (Message 68)
|
|
|
73
|
Re: For just $3.25US you too (Message 73)
|
For just $3.25US you too (Message 43)
By jar
05-23-2005 7:19 PM
|
|
|
74
|
Re: James dobson (Message 74)
|
James dobson (Message 42)
By Phat
05-23-2005 6:33 PM
|
|
|
75
|
Re: Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 75)
|
Re: Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 66)
By Tal
05-25-2005 3:13 PM
|
|
|
76
|
star wars (Message 76)
|
Message 49
|
|
|
77
|
Re: Rights lost since 9/11 (Message 77)
|
Re: Rights lost since 9/11 (Message 72)
By Tal
05-25-2005 3:46 PM
|
|
|
78
|
Message 78
By Monk
05-25-2005 4:15 PM
|
Message 70
|
|
|
79
|
Re: Chicken little Democrats (Message 79)
|
Chicken little Democrats (Message 58)
By Monk
05-25-2005 12:57 PM
|
|
|
80
|
Message 80
By Phat
05-25-2005 4:53 PM
|
Message 70
|
|
|
81
|
Amendments (Message 81)
|
|
|
|
82
|
Re: Chicken little Democrats (Message 82)
By Monk
05-25-2005 5:27 PM
|
Re: Chicken little Democrats (Message 79)
|
|
|
83
|
Message 83
By Monk
05-25-2005 6:46 PM
|
Message 80
By Phat
05-25-2005 4:53 PM
|
|
|
84
|
Re: Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 84)
|
Re: Blatant misrepresentation of Democratic ideals (Message 60)
|
|
|
85
|
Re: Amendments (Message 85)
|
Amendments (Message 81)
|
|
|
86
|
Out there... (Message 86)
|
Re: Chicken little Democrats (Message 82)
By Monk
05-25-2005 5:27 PM
|
|
|
87
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 87)
By nator
05-25-2005 9:09 PM
|
Republican compromise (Message 52)
By Monk
05-25-2005 8:37 AM
|
|
|
88
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 88)
By nator
05-25-2005 9:18 PM
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 56)
By Monk
05-25-2005 11:41 AM
|
|
|
89
|
Corporate influence (Message 89)
|
Message 83
By Monk
05-25-2005 6:46 PM
|
|
|
90
|
Re: Chicken little Democrats (Message 90)
By nator
05-25-2005 9:30 PM
|
Chicken little Democrats (Message 58)
By Monk
05-25-2005 12:57 PM
|
|
|
91
|
Message 91
|
Amendments (Message 81)
|
|
|
92
|
Re: Chicken little Democrats (Message 92)
By nator
05-25-2005 9:51 PM
|
Re: Chicken little Democrats (Message 82)
By Monk
05-25-2005 5:27 PM
|
|
|
93
|
Re: Corporate influence (Message 93)
By Monk
05-25-2005 11:22 PM
|
Corporate influence (Message 89)
|
|
|
94
|
Re: Chicken little Democrats (Message 94)
By Monk
05-25-2005 11:28 PM
|
Re: Chicken little Democrats (Message 92)
By nator
05-25-2005 9:51 PM
|
|
|
95
|
Re: Corporate influence (Message 95)
|
Re: Corporate influence (Message 93)
By Monk
05-25-2005 11:22 PM
|
|
|
96
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 96)
By Monk
05-26-2005 12:18 AM
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 87)
By nator
05-25-2005 9:09 PM
|
|
|
97
|
Re: Corporate influence (Message 97)
By Monk
05-26-2005 12:57 AM
|
Re: Corporate influence (Message 95)
|
|
|
98
|
Re: Corporate influence (Message 98)
|
Re: Corporate influence (Message 97)
By Monk
05-26-2005 12:57 AM
|
|
|
99
|
Message 99
|
Message 78
By Monk
05-25-2005 4:15 PM
|
|
|
100
|
Message 100
|
Message 83
By Monk
05-25-2005 6:46 PM
|
|
|
101
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 101)
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 96)
By Monk
05-26-2005 12:18 AM
|
|
|
102
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 102)
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 101)
|
|
|
103
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 103)
By Tal
05-26-2005 8:00 AM
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 101)
|
|
|
104
|
Re: Chicken little Democrats (Message 104)
By nator
05-26-2005 8:20 AM
|
Re: Chicken little Democrats (Message 94)
By Monk
05-25-2005 11:28 PM
|
|
|
105
|
Re: Corporate influence (Message 105)
|
Re: Corporate influence (Message 97)
By Monk
05-26-2005 12:57 AM
|
|
|
106
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 106)
By nator
05-26-2005 8:38 AM
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 96)
By Monk
05-26-2005 12:18 AM
|
|
|
107
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 107)
By nator
05-26-2005 8:46 AM
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 103)
By Tal
05-26-2005 8:00 AM
|
|
|
108
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 108)
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 102)
|
|
|
109
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 109)
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 103)
By Tal
05-26-2005 8:00 AM
|
|
|
110
|
Re: Corporate influence (Message 110)
By Monk
05-26-2005 12:24 PM
|
Re: Corporate influence (Message 98)
|
|
|
111
|
Re: Corporate influence (Message 111)
|
Re: Corporate influence (Message 110)
By Monk
05-26-2005 12:24 PM
|
|
|
112
|
Message 112
By Monk
05-26-2005 4:18 PM
|
Message 99
|
|
|
113
|
Message 113
By Monk
05-26-2005 4:27 PM
|
Message 100
|
|
|
114
|
Re: Corporate influence (Message 114)
By Monk
05-26-2005 4:50 PM
|
Re: Corporate influence (Message 105)
|
|
|
115
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 115)
By Monk
05-26-2005 5:28 PM
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 106)
By nator
05-26-2005 8:38 AM
|
|
|
116
|
The 'Inner Circle' fits the sterotype like a glove (Message 116)
|
Message 112
By Monk
05-26-2005 4:18 PM
|
|
|
117
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 117)
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 115)
By Monk
05-26-2005 5:28 PM
|
|
|
118
|
Re: Corporate influence (Message 118)
|
Re: Corporate influence (Message 114)
By Monk
05-26-2005 4:50 PM
|
|
|
119
|
Message 119
|
Message 112
By Monk
05-26-2005 4:18 PM
|
|
|
120
|
Message 120
|
Message 113
By Monk
05-26-2005 4:27 PM
|
|
|
121
|
Message 121
|
Message 119
|
|
|
122
|
Message 122
|
|
|
|
123
|
Message 123
|
Message 122
|
|
|
124
|
Message 124
By Monk
05-27-2005 10:08 AM
|
Message 122
|
|
|
125
|
Huh? (Message 125)
By nator
05-27-2005 10:18 AM
|
Message 124
By Monk
05-27-2005 10:08 AM
|
|
|
126
|
Re: Huh? (Message 126)
By Monk
05-27-2005 11:49 AM
|
Huh? (Message 125)
By nator
05-27-2005 10:18 AM
|
|
|
127
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 127)
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 117)
|
|
|
128
|
I don't see "rub out religion" (Message 128)
|
Message 124
By Monk
05-27-2005 10:08 AM
|
|
|
129
|
Effectiveness of vapid political advertisments (Message 129)
|
Re: Republican compromise (Message 127)
|
|
|
130
|
Message 130
|
Message 124
By Monk
05-27-2005 10:08 AM
|
|
|
131
|
Re: I don't see "rub out religion" (Message 131)
|
I don't see "rub out religion" (Message 128)
|
|
|
132
|
Re: I don't see "rub out religion" (Message 132)
By Monk
05-27-2005 2:53 PM
|
I don't see "rub out religion" (Message 128)
|
|
|
133
|
Message 133
By Monk
05-27-2005 3:09 PM
|
Message 130
|
|
|
134
|
Message 134
|
Message 133
By Monk
05-27-2005 3:09 PM
|
|
|
135
|
Message 135
|
Message 133
By Monk
05-27-2005 3:09 PM
|
|
|
136
|
Message 136
By Monk
05-27-2005 4:14 PM
|
Message 134
|
|
|
137
|
Message 137
By Monk
05-27-2005 4:18 PM
|
Message 135
|
|
|
138
|
Re: Huh? (Message 138)
By nator
05-27-2005 4:31 PM
|
Re: Huh? (Message 126)
By Monk
05-27-2005 11:49 AM
|
|
|
139
|
Message 139
By nator
05-27-2005 4:38 PM
|
Message 133
By Monk
05-27-2005 3:09 PM
|
|
|
140
|
Message 140
|
Message 133
By Monk
05-27-2005 3:09 PM
|
|
|
141
|
Message 141
By Monk
05-27-2005 5:06 PM
|
Message 140
|
|
|
142
|
Message 142
|
Message 133
By Monk
05-27-2005 3:09 PM
|
|
|
143
|
Just a thought (Message 143)
|
Message 122
|
|
|
144
|
Message 144
|
Message 124
By Monk
05-27-2005 10:08 AM
|
|
|
145
|
Message 145
By Monk
05-27-2005 7:32 PM
|
Message 142
|
|
|
146
|
Message 146
By Monk
05-27-2005 7:42 PM
|
Message 144
|
|
|
147
|
Re: I don't see "rub out religion" (Message 147)
|
Re: I don't see "rub out religion" (Message 132)
By Monk
05-27-2005 2:53 PM
|
|
|
148
|
Message 148
|
Re: I don't see "rub out religion" (Message 132)
By Monk
05-27-2005 2:53 PM
|
|
|
149
|
Message 149
|
Message 146
By Monk
05-27-2005 7:42 PM
|
|
|
150
|
Message 150
By Monk
05-27-2005 8:30 PM
|
Message 148
|
|
|
151
|
Message 151
|
Message 150
By Monk
05-27-2005 8:30 PM
|
|
|
152
|
Message 152
By Monk
05-27-2005 8:58 PM
|
Message 151
|
|
|
153
|
References to religion (Message 153)
|
Message 152
By Monk
05-27-2005 8:58 PM
|
|
|
154
|
Message 154
|
Message 152
By Monk
05-27-2005 8:58 PM
|
|
|
155
|
Message 155
|
Message 154
|
|
|
156
|
Message 156
By Monk
05-28-2005 1:53 AM
|
Message 155
|
|
|
157
|
Message 157
|
Message 145
By Monk
05-27-2005 7:32 PM
|
|
|
158
|
Message 158
|
Message 155
|
|
|
159
|
Message 159
By Phat
05-28-2005 9:15 AM
|
Message 122
|
|
|
160
|
Message 160
By Phat
05-28-2005 9:22 AM
|
Message 151
|
|
|
161
|
Message 161
|
Message 156
By Monk
05-28-2005 1:53 AM
|
|
|
162
|
Message 162
|
Message 158
|
|
|
163
|
Message 163
|
Message 160
By Phat
05-28-2005 9:22 AM
|
|
|
164
|
Message 164
|
Message 159
By Phat
05-28-2005 9:15 AM
|
|
|
165
|
Message 165
|
Message 160
By Phat
05-28-2005 9:22 AM
|
|
|
166
|
Message 166
|
Message 162
|
|
|
167
|
Theocracy (Message 167)
By Monk
05-28-2005 11:28 AM
|
Message 157
|
|
|
168
|
Message 168
By Morte
05-28-2005 11:35 AM
|
Message 160
By Phat
05-28-2005 9:22 AM
|
|
|
169
|
Message 169
|
Message 166
|
|
|
170
|
Message 170
|
Theocracy (Message 167)
By Monk
05-28-2005 11:28 AM
|
|
|
171
|
Message 171
By nator
05-28-2005 1:10 PM
|
Message 159
By Phat
05-28-2005 9:15 AM
|
|
|
172
|
Message 172
By nator
05-28-2005 1:13 PM
|
Message 160
By Phat
05-28-2005 9:22 AM
|
|
|
173
|
Hary Potter books? (Message 173)
By jar
05-28-2005 1:50 PM
|
Message 160
By Phat
05-28-2005 9:22 AM
|
|
|
174
|
Re: Theocracy (Message 174)
|
Theocracy (Message 167)
By Monk
05-28-2005 11:28 AM
|
|
|
175
|
Message 175
|
Message 169
|
|
|
176
|
Message 176
By Phat
05-28-2005 3:43 PM
|
Message 171
By nator
05-28-2005 1:10 PM
|
|
|
177
|
Message 177
By Phat
05-28-2005 3:50 PM
|
Message 165
|
|
|
178
|
Message 178
By Phat
05-28-2005 3:53 PM
|
Message 163
|
|
|
179
|
Message 179
By nator
05-28-2005 4:41 PM
|
Message 176
By Phat
05-28-2005 3:43 PM
|
|
|
180
|
Message 180
By nator
05-28-2005 5:08 PM
|
Message 177
By Phat
05-28-2005 3:50 PM
|
|
|
181
|
Message 181
|
Message 175
|
|
|
182
|
Quoting the ACLJ will not be much of a rebuttal (Message 182)
By jar
05-28-2005 5:22 PM
|
Message 176
By Phat
05-28-2005 3:43 PM
|
|
|
183
|
Message 183
By jar
05-28-2005 5:24 PM
|
Message 177
By Phat
05-28-2005 3:50 PM
|
|
|
184
|
Message 184
|
Message 181
|
|
|
185
|
Message 185
|
Message 181
|
|
|
186
|
Message 186
|
Message 184
|
|
|
187
|
Message 187
|
Message 185
|
|
|
188
|
Message 188
By Phat
05-29-2005 3:13 AM
|
Message 180
By nator
05-28-2005 5:08 PM
|
|
|
189
|
Message 189
|
Message 186
|
|
|
190
|
"Lifestyle"? (Message 190)
|
Message 188
By Phat
05-29-2005 3:13 AM
|
|
|
191
|
Message 191
|
Message 188
By Phat
05-29-2005 3:13 AM
|
|
|
192
|
Message 192
|
Message 188
By Phat
05-29-2005 3:13 AM
|
|
|
193
|
Message 193
|
Message 189
|
|
|
194
|
Message 194
|
Message 193
|
|
|
195
|
Message 195
By nator
05-29-2005 8:06 AM
|
Message 188
By Phat
05-29-2005 3:13 AM
|
|
|
196
|
Message 196
By Phat
05-29-2005 1:27 PM
|
Message 195
By nator
05-29-2005 8:06 AM
|
|
|
197
|
Message 197
|
Message 196
By Phat
05-29-2005 1:27 PM
|
|
|
198
|
Message 198
|
Message 196
By Phat
05-29-2005 1:27 PM
|
|
|
199
|
Message 199
By jar
05-29-2005 4:25 PM
|
Message 188
By Phat
05-29-2005 3:13 AM
|
|
|
200
|
What is the ACLJ anyway? (Message 200)
|
Message 188
By Phat
05-29-2005 3:13 AM
|
|
|
201
|
Re: What is the ACLJ anyway? (Message 201)
By jar
05-29-2005 4:44 PM
|
What is the ACLJ anyway? (Message 200)
|
|
|
202
|
Re: even YEC believe in "evolution" (Message 202)
|
Message 189
|
|
|
203
|
Re: even YEC believe in "evolution" (Message 203)
By Phat
05-30-2005 12:04 AM
|
Re: even YEC believe in "evolution" (Message 202)
|
|
|
204
|
Re: even YEC believe in "evolution" (Message 204)
By jar
05-30-2005 12:09 AM
|
Re: even YEC believe in "evolution" (Message 203)
By Phat
05-30-2005 12:04 AM
|
|
|
205
|
Message 205
|
Re: even YEC believe in "evolution" (Message 203)
By Phat
05-30-2005 12:04 AM
|
|
|
206
|
Message 206
|
Message 194
|
|
|
207
|
Re: even YEC believe in "evolution" (Message 207)
|
Re: even YEC believe in "evolution" (Message 202)
|
|
|
208
|
Re: even YEC believe in "evolution" (Message 208)
|
Re: even YEC believe in "evolution" (Message 203)
By Phat
05-30-2005 12:04 AM
|
|
|
209
|
Rrhains good answer (Message 209)
By Phat
05-30-2005 5:22 AM
|
Re: even YEC believe in "evolution" (Message 208)
|
|
|
210
|
Message 210
|
Message 206
|
|
|
211
|
Re: Rrhains good answer (Message 211)
|
Rrhains good answer (Message 209)
By Phat
05-30-2005 5:22 AM
|
|
|
212
|
Message 212
By Phat
05-30-2005 5:53 AM
|
Message 205
|
|
|
213
|
Re: Rrhains good answer..*chuckle* (Message 213)
By Phat
05-30-2005 5:59 AM
|
Re: Rrhains good answer (Message 211)
|
|
|
214
|
Re: Rrhains good answer..*chuckle* (Message 214)
|
Re: Rrhains good answer..*chuckle* (Message 213)
By Phat
05-30-2005 5:59 AM
|
|
|
215
|
Message 215
|
Message 210
|
|
|
216
|
Re: Rrhains good answer (Message 216)
|
Re: Rrhains good answer (Message 211)
|
|
|
217
|
Message 217
|
Message 212
By Phat
05-30-2005 5:53 AM
|
|
|
218
|
Message 218
By nator
05-30-2005 8:45 AM
|
Message 196
By Phat
05-29-2005 1:27 PM
|
|
|
219
|
Phat, is this the kind of government and society you's like? (Message 219)
By nator
05-30-2005 9:38 AM
|
Re: Rrhains good answer..*chuckle* (Message 213)
By Phat
05-30-2005 5:59 AM
|
|
|
220
|
Message 220
|
Message 206
|
|
|
221
|
Message 221
|
Re: even YEC believe in "evolution" (Message 207)
|
|
|
222
|
Re: Rrhains good answer (Message 222)
|
Re: Rrhains good answer (Message 216)
|
|
|
223
|
Message 223
|
Message 221
|
|
|
224
|
Message 224
|
Message 221
|
|
|
225
|
Message 225
|
Message 215
|
|
|
226
|
Message 226
|
Message 223
|
|
|
227
|
Message 227
|
Message 225
|
|
|
228
|
Message 228
|
Message 226
|
|
|
229
|
Message 229
|
Message 227
|
|
|
230
|
Message 230
By Phat
05-31-2005 7:28 AM
|
Message 227
|
|
|
231
|
Message 231
By nator
05-31-2005 8:02 AM
|
Message 230
By Phat
05-31-2005 7:28 AM
|
|
|
232
|
Message 232
|
Message 228
|
|
|
233
|
Message 233
|
Message 232
|
|
|
234
|
Should we let Bill Frist & Co. change the rules of the senate ? (Message 234)
|
|
|
|
235
|
For those looking at theocracy driven by Judges... (Message 235)
|
|
|
|
236
|
A couple of other examples... (Message 236)
By Phat
05-31-2005 1:12 PM
|
Message 232
|
|
|
237
|
Re: For those looking at theocracy driven by Judges... (Message 237)
By Phat
05-31-2005 1:20 PM
|
For those looking at theocracy driven by Judges... (Message 235)
|
|
|
238
|
Please go to ACLU topic (Message 238)
|
A couple of other examples... (Message 236)
By Phat
05-31-2005 1:12 PM
|
|
|
239
|
Message 239
|
Message 233
|
|
|
240
|
Re: A couple of other examples... (Message 240)
|
A couple of other examples... (Message 236)
By Phat
05-31-2005 1:12 PM
|
|
|
241
|
Message 241
|
Message 239
|
|
|
242
|
Message 242
|
Message 241
|
|
|
243
|
Re: For those looking at theocracy driven by Judges... (Message 243)
|
Re: For those looking at theocracy driven by Judges... (Message 237)
By Phat
05-31-2005 1:20 PM
|
|
|
244
|
Re: For those looking at theocracy driven by Judges... (Message 244)
By nator
05-31-2005 11:21 PM
|
Re: For those looking at theocracy driven by Judges... (Message 237)
By Phat
05-31-2005 1:20 PM
|
|
|
245
|
Message 245
|
Message 242
|
|
|
246
|
Re: For those looking at theocracy driven by Judges... (Message 246)
|
Re: For those looking at theocracy driven by Judges... (Message 244)
By nator
05-31-2005 11:21 PM
|
|
|
247
|
Re: For those looking at theocracy driven by Judges... (Message 247)
By nator
06-01-2005 8:41 AM
|
Re: For those looking at theocracy driven by Judges... (Message 246)
|
|
|
248
|
Re: For those looking at theocracy driven by Judges... (Message 248)
|
Re: For those looking at theocracy driven by Judges... (Message 247)
By nator
06-01-2005 8:41 AM
|
|
|
249
|
Re: For those looking at theocracy driven by Judges... (Message 249)
By nator
06-01-2005 3:35 PM
|
Re: For those looking at theocracy driven by Judges... (Message 248)
|
|
|
250
|
For crash and rrhain, a recent example... (Message 250)
|
|
|
|
251
|
Re: For crash and rrhain, a recent example... (Message 251)
|
For crash and rrhain, a recent example... (Message 250)
|
|
|
252
|
Re: For crash and rrhain, a recent example... (Message 252)
|
Re: For crash and rrhain, a recent example... (Message 251)
|
|
|
253
|
Re: For crash and rrhain, a recent example... (Message 253)
|
Re: For crash and rrhain, a recent example... (Message 252)
|
|
|
254
|
Re: For crash and rrhain, a recent example... (Message 254)
|
Re: For crash and rrhain, a recent example... (Message 253)
|
|
|
255
|
Message 255
|
Re: For crash and rrhain, a recent example... (Message 254)
|
|
|
256
|
Terminal topic drift - Closing time (Stealth A-Moose comes out of the closet) (Message 256)
|
|
|